iWatch won’t show its face at September 9 event, sources claim


The iWatch may not be unveiled September 9 claim supply chain sources.
The iWatch may not be unveiled September 9 claim supply chain sources.

The world may be buzzing to get a glimpse of Apple’s eagerly-anticipated iWatch, but according to sources from the “upstream supply chain” the company is unlikely to unveil its take on the smart watch Apple’s September 9 press conference.

The report, from Digitimes, also notes that despite various iWatch components already entering production, the wearable device itself is still in what is termed the engineering verification testing (EVT) stage.

After this stage is completed, the product then enters the PVT (Product Validation Test) stage of production, during which the assembly line runs at full speed to produce a small number of finished units for quality assurance purposes. Only after all faults are ironed out in the PVT stage can mass production finally begin.

What all of this means is that, seemingly affirming previous reports, it is highly unlikely that the iWatch will be available before 2015.

Although it’s not unheard of (and may even be the the rule rather than the exception) for Apple to use smoke, mirrors and an unfinished prototype when it first unveils a new product category, the fact that the company still has the option of changing the iWatch’s design between EVT and PVT might mean that it won’t want to debut the new device, since it could potentially look different to the model to be shipped.

Re/code previously reported that the iWatch (or whatever Apple calls its wearable) will be unveiled September 9 alongside the iPhone 6. 

Well, just one week longer until we find out together.

Source: Digitimes

Deals of the Day

14 responses to “iWatch won’t show its face at September 9 event, sources claim”

  1. SgtFire says:

    Oy Vei!

  2. Shane says:

    I know it’s all just rumors but I’m getting really tired of the back and forth of “the iwatch will be there,” “just kidding it won’t be,” “actually it will be”

  3. Kaess says:

    If the iWatch isn’t going to be previewed at the 9/9 event, Apple would have Jim Dalrymple give a “Nope” to temper expectations. The lack of a “Nope” from Jim with the widespread reporting of an iWatch preview from reliable sources (Recode and Bloomberg), indicates that Apple will indeed preview the device at the 9/9 event

    • lucascott says:

      i would trust the lack of a Nope more than I would Digitimes. I can believe that perhaps it won’t release until more like Oct or even early November but it will likely be mentioned because they won’t want someone leaking any FCC applications first.

  4. Morekop says:

    Why the Sundial?

  5. 1manWarMachine says:

    This crap changes every day.

  6. scxfan says:

    I don’t think Apple is doing all this stuff a tthe Flint Center just to show off a new phone.

    They could do that at the Apple Campus.

  7. scxfan says:

    Oh, and DigiTimes track record is abysmal at best.

  8. Jhabril_Harris says:

    “The report, from Digitimes,”


  9. Barry Jones says:

    Are you kidding these fuckin stupid articles are so annoying, one minute they are gunna release the iwatch at the apple event, next minute due to production issues there will be no iwatch breaking news breaking news.

    Hows about shut the fuck up with these stupid rumor articles and wait till the event actually takes place then post all the articles you want cause right now this site is a joke when it comes to apple stuff 90% of the shit they post turns out wrong
    Ps i mean digitimes and bgr.com

  10. Digitimes has literally no track record. Everything they’ve spewed over the years has either been incredibly obvious or wrong.

  11. laley21 says:

    There is no freaking Iwatch. people get it thru your skulls and stop spreading lies. The main attraction is going to be the iPhone period! the Iwatch does not exist.. where are the leaks this late in the game?!! Same thing with the apple TV every year spreading the same crap, now is the watch.

  12. lucascott says:

    Digitimes is not a consistent source. what they say might be true, but it’s even more likely they are full of crap

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *