Like every other company, Apple and Google have had their share of highs and lows in the past — but one thing that’s for sure is that neither of them can keep going from strength-to-strength indefinitely; they’ll both stumble at some point in the future.
But which will be the first to take a tumble?
Join us in this week’s Friday Night Fight between Cult of Android and Cult of Mac as we battle it out over that very question!
Luke Dormehl (Writer, Cult of Mac): It’s Friday again, Killian, my old frenemy, which means just one thing: Friday Night Fights.
Axl Rose once reminded us that nothing lasts forever — not cold November rain, and not the dominance of any one tech company, either. Google and Apple have been directly competing with each other for around a decade now, and both have had their fair share of ups and downs. But which will stumble first?
I presume that you, as the defender of all things green and malware-riddled, will say Apple. Right?
Killian Bell (Writer, Cult of Android): Wise words there from Rose. I have a feeling I’ll be borrowing some more of his lyrics throughout this fight as you take another battering. There’s something in your eyes, Luke. Don’t hang your head in sorrow, and please don’t cry.
Anyway… I think it’s hard to imagine either company stumbling right now, but I do think Google has more stability. It has so many fingers in so many pies, that even if one of them goes sour, there are other hugely successful products to fall back on. Plus I just can’t envisage a future in which we don’t need Google search.
Apple’s currently riding on the iPhone in many ways, with iPod and iPad sales falling. And the problem with that is, one wrong move could result in catastrophe. Apple had a very small taste of this when customers started flocking to Android because it refused to offer a smartphone with a larger display, and it could happen again on a larger scale.
I’m not saying it will; I love the iPhone and I’m sure Apple will continue to make it even better every year. But if we were to see a string of disappointing refreshes later on, and iPhone sales began to fall, it would really hit Apple hard.

Photo: Apple
Luke: Geez, talk about hedging your bets, Killian. The question is which company will stumble first. Your apologetic writing sounds like you’re trying to get out of a speeding ticket.
The reality, though, is that while Google may have its fingers in a lot of pies, barely any of them are making it money. Google’s cash comes from one place: ad revenue, and with ad-blockers becoming more and more prevalent I wouldn’t be surprised if it runs into problems sometime in the near future. I love a lot of the Google services, but I still can’t shake the feeling that the company get very, very lucky early on with AdWords and has basically been milking that ever since.
Apple, by comparison, is close to celebrating its 40th anniversary — and it’s reinvented itself countless times since then. The iPhone is the big moneymaker, but don’t let that fool you into thinking the company’s other product categories are doing awfully. For instance, there was a report just a couple of years ago stating that if Apple spun out the iPad as its own business, it would be more valuable than McDonald’s. That’s amazing!
The Apple Watch is taking a big slice out of consumer watch sales, too, and let’s not ignore possible innovations like an Apple Car on the horizon. Apple has a record that speaks for itself.
Google is run by dreamers and, while there’s definitely a place for that in tech, people who dream all the time also tend not to watch where they’re going. Magic 8 Ball says: Stumble may be imminent.
Killian: That’s fantastic, but that report is from January 2013, and I think you’ll find iPad sales have fallen almost every quarter ever since. But that’s besides the point.
I’m not saying the iPad and Apple’s other businesses aren’t successful on their own; if Apple announced today it was giving up on iPhone and iPad and everything else, and was only going to sell Macs from now on, it would still be an incredibly successful company. But nowhere near as successful as it is right now.
And yes, I know the question was which company would stumble first — not which one’s going to go broke first — which is why my money’s on Apple; a significant drop in iPhone sales could not be considered anything less than a stumble. But it’s hard to imagine a Google product that could fall as easily.
You mention ads, and you do have a point there, but the percentage of people using ad blockers is still small in the grand scheme of things. And with mobile devices becoming increasingly popular, it’s never been more difficult to avoid ads; they’re in our apps and games, they’re in our social network feeds, they’re in our emails, they play before every video we watch, and they’re on the web.
Ad blockers aren’t so easy to come by on mobile — Google has already begun blocking them on Android — and advertisers will always find new ways to make sure we can’t avoid ads. I don’t think that will ever change, so I don’t think we should be too concerned about Google’s ad business.
Google could also find new ways to monetize Android if it needed to — though I don’t think it will — and with more than 1 billion users worldwide, it could make plenty of cash from it. It has already launched its own mobile network in Project Fi, and as that grows, I’m sure there will be plenty of money to make from that.

Photo: Google
Luke: So when are you predicting this catastrophic iPhone stumble then? Because we should probably add your name to the Apple Death Knell Counter.
I simply can’t agree that Apple is more likely to stumble first. The iPhone business goes from strength to strength and, as you’ve pointed out, Apple’s other businesses still make it an enormously successful business. Google, on the other hand, certainly faces challenges in the future.
It aims too wide with its ambitions, which this new Alphabet restructuring seems to be an admission of. The reality is that Google has already stumbled plenty of times. Google Glass, anyone? Do you even remember Google Catalog Search, Killian? What about the weirdly-Apple sounding iGoogle?
If any of these disasters had happened to Apple, people would be climbing over each other to proclaim the end of Cupertino’s reign. But Google just isn’t held to the same standards. It’s got a very successful business, but it’s one that faces arguably more challenges in the long-term than Apple’s iPhone business.
Killian: I think you’re missing my point a little.
None of Google’s failures were its biggest businesses. Let’s just forget Google Glass, because it was never supposed to be a major success (it was explicitly referred to as a prototype meant only for early “explorers,” and priced at $1,500). As for Catalog Search and iGoogle, they were nowhere near major successes, so Google never relied on them in the same way that it relies on ads, or Apple relies on the iPhone today.
But my point is this: if were were to ignore the smaller businesses that these companies don’t rely on quite so much, and just focus on the big ones that are really holding them up, I think it’s harder to imagine Google’s falling quite as easily as Apple’s could.
The smartphone business is incredibly turbulent. The iPhone is doing extremely well now, and it probably will for the foreseeable future — but let’s not forget that Samsung’s devices have been immensely successful, too, and now the South Korean company is trying its hardest to fight falling sales.
I’m not saying Google won’t have failures — any company that experiments as much as Google does is going to produce a few flops here and there. But its big businesses are stable, and I’m betting they will continue to be stable even after we’re all bored of the iPhone.

Photo: Google
Luke: I think you’re missing a trick if you think search is going to remain stable going forward, particularly as technology gets better at predicting what we’re looking for and new types of search (images, for instance) become the norm.
Google may be dominating right now, but it’s far from the company Apple is — and I can’t see Apple falling to its level any time soon. But enough of the squabbling between us. Let’s let the readers chip in.
Sooner or later, Apple or Google’s got to make a major misstep, regardless of how successful they may be right now. So which one do you think it’s going to be? And, more importantly, why?
Friday Night Fights is a series of weekly death matches between two no-mercy brawlers who will fight to the death — or at least agree to disagree — about which is better: Apple or Google, iOS or Android?
40 responses to “Apple vs. Google: Which titan will crumble first?”
Idiots with no experience in business. I’d sooner ask my dog about these topics.
Why don’t you share your views on this topic since they are idiots with no experience…..SMH
GOOGLE FAILURES:
Google X
Google Catalog
Web Accelerator
Video Player
Google Answers
Google Wave
Wiki Search
Google Audio Ads
Dodgeball
Jaiku
Google Notebook
Google Page Creator
Google Buzz
Google Print Ads
Google Radio Ads
Google Glass
Google Coupons
Google Viewer
Google Checkout
Orkut
Google Lively
Google +
Google’s “plus”
Motorola Purchase
Google Desktop
Google Friend Connect
Picnik
Needlebase
Social Graph API
One Pass
Google Related
Google Talk Chatback
iGoogle
Bump
Flock
Google Currents
Bufferbox
Google Schemer
Google Voice
Google Voice Search
Google Knol
Google SearchMash
Google Mashup Editor
Google Shared Stuff
That is a long list, but I wouldn’t consider them all failures, most of those technologies were integrated into other google products.
And they make $0 from almost all the rest.
You forgot the barges. You gotta have the barges. There isn’t a more hilarious illustration of how Google doesn’t think things through before they start throwing money around than the barges.
Inane shallow discussion.
Hey JD, how you been?
The future is not just about search, it is about machine learning. Apple has taken a privacy over convienience stance, so they have already lost that game. Google integrates into your life and you would feel lost without it, not so with Apple because their whole business is propped up by an illusion created through marketing and branding, they have the farthest to fall when they eventually stumble.
I completely agree with you, Apple keeps on ceding a lot of grounds or rather not doing well on technology of the future, Apple cloud infrastructure is seriously lacking considering where the other technology firms are heading towards. As stated, Apple relies solely on the IPhone and if the iphone sales stutters or falls below analyst predictions, Apple values suffers as evidenced by a 100bn wiped out of Apple stock which is a lot of money.
Google might have a lot of failed products but they aren’t their main products and that is the key point.
thats an incorrect assumption. Apple doesn’t share information/sell it like Google does. It doesn’t mean it doesn’t get used. iOS 9, for instance, is adding smart search and “proactive” which runs locally instead of on the cloud. It keeps your info private but still gives you the convenience you’re looking for. You can have the benefits without selling out for a dollar like Google does. I do agree it makes things easier for Google to implement system wide things(mostly for marketing purposes to make more money from ads) where as Apples software will take time to learn about you. With that said, a lot of the general public already sees Google as the more evil company and that will only get worse. “Techies” will continue to turn a blind eye but as more and more concern grows in the public about privacy Google will fall harder than they did with their Mototrola acquisition.
It is an incorrect assumption is to say that Google shares and sells information about you, that simply isn’t true but some people believe it.
Again it comes down to marketing and branding which Apple does so well, they control the message so that people aren’t spreading FUD about things they don’t or can’t understand.
Actually, I am using iOS 9, and I hardly use the proactive page. Why would I go to somewhere that might know what I want when I can go directly to what I want? But, I do like iOS 9 with the Music app recommendation when it plug in headphones, and I enjoy the News app (which I used to find this) and Low Battery mode (which I am using too). But in my opinion, Apple I couldn’t see dying, or Google. However, this is coming from a Chrome user on a MacBook Pro, so…
But they both have their audiences, their strengths, and their weaknesses, (*cough* Google Glass *cough*) so they can co-exist.
Companies need to maximize profits. Not market share, not goofy glasses. Profits.
$18.3 Billion- the most profit ever made by a company in a quarter. By Apple.
Profit above all! you sound like a corporate tool and an uninformed Apple fanboy. Google glass was a prototype Google was testing and never marketed as a consumer product.
Google spends more on altruistic endeavors than Apple and that is what should really matter, giving back to the people who helped make them so profitable, not hoarding billions in an offshore bank account to avoid paying their fair share of taxes like Apple.
Google is hiding taxes the same way. They are both corporate companies. When something is free or looks cheap, you should know that you are the product. The petroleum of the 21st century is personal data. In order of the excessive amount of growing ads to be targeted, companies need more personal data. Apple is failing in that and I think in the long term companies like Google will dominate the market of using personal data. Unfortunately the corporation more evil will win. Yes, it is a all about profits, shares, money and greed – this is how the world is running, if you don’t like it, there are still experimental cities in China where they run Mao’s pure form of communism, just to experiment with people. If you want to abolish the personal property, family, religion and free choice – fight the free market, but if you don’t – you should face the reality of the western culture and its dominance role.
Yup, keep making excuses for Google’s failures. Typical dumb *ss geek. Let’s face it Google’s basically the next Microsoft except that it doesn’t make any $ from the malware infested Android. Unlike Microsoft, who made billions from Windows. But both have the uncanny ability to copy Apple and then try to sell it off as their own innovation. Chrome, Android, Nexus phones, Chrome books, all copies of Apple products. Get real. Google’s desperate to replace their dwindling ads business with another revenue stream before the *hit hits the fan. Can’t wait for Apple to drive the likes of HTC, Motorola and, yes, Samsung out of business. Then we’ll see how much Google’s really committed to crapware, malware Android.
Google are just as guilty of hiding profits overseas, so don’t try pulling the wool over anyones eyes champ.
Please list these “altruistic endeavours” you preach about. Have you even attempted to find out what Apple does in forms of charity or likewise? Aids research? Red cross? Hurricane, earthquake and tsunami relief in China, Japan, Haiti? Blood, organ and tissue donor programs? Its Red product campaigns? Breast and cancer research? Stanford university hospital building program? Thrugood Marshall College fund? Apple is in the top 10 donation list of S&P companies. Your comments are either completely naive or deliberately misleading. Either way, your attempts to sully Apples good works by FUD, haven’t gone unnoticed. Next time have some facts to back your baseless claims up.
A privacy over convenience stance has a greater moral value than you could ever put a price on. You clearly don’t use Apple devices/services, because they are better integrated than anything google have cooked up. Google have tried and failed to emulate iMessage, FaceTime, Notes, iBooks, iTunes, Siri, Appstore, Game Center, Photo syncing, Keychain syncing, Safari bookmarks, Time Machine and so on. All these are integrated services on every Apple device. You cannot say the same for google. Time to take your blinkers off and come prepared with some facts next time you choose to misrepresent the truth. Don’t fear, I’m always happy to correct your misrepresentations, deliberate or otherwise.
Google might be an idea factory but it doesn’t have the tenacity, mental discipline, and attention to thousands of details that is needed to successfully ship a highly complex hardware product. It’s not in their DNA. You start from the CEO down and everyone of them might be genius bright but they get bored easily. Why do you think they keep dropping products? They’re the typical smartest kid in class. Growing up, everything in school was so easy for them, they didn’t have to work hard to get good grades so they never developed any tenacity. The only thing that keeps them focused is a challenging problem that needs to be figured out. Once they’ve figured that out, they aren’t interested in the grunt work of ironing out all the little details.
That is a very accurate assessment, but the same could be said of Apple, they make great products/devices but their online services, namely everything iCloud, are not finished and lacking features. The best thing about Apple right now is that you can run Googles services on it.
Almost nobody makes $ from the cloud. Sell 50 million phones and 50 million apps. That makes $. Cloud my *ss. That’s for the dumb *ss geeks.
No, the same cannot be said of Apple. Yes, iCloud isn’t the greatest. As you said, it’s not finished and is lacking features. But Apple has not abandoned it and continues to work at improving it. In the meantime, how many products has Google launched and then abandoned leaving users high and dry? As I said, tenacity, mental discipline, attention to detail. Apple has it, Google doesn’t.
I’d put my money on the one that has shown a track record of steady, persistent and successful effort rather than on the dilettante who drops a billion here, a billion there as they flit from one inadequately thought out new thing to the next, then losing interest and giving up as soon as they encounter adversity.
Apple is a hardware company, Google does software and services, its hard to compare the two. Software is conducive to new ideas, devoloping hardware is limited in that respect.
No, google are primarily an advertising company. Have a look at their spreadsheet. They use software and services to implement their advertising scams, ahh I mean, services. They didn’t purchase the android platform to make friends, lets get that straight. It was to build a platform to phish for adverting.
I only wish Apple had ambition to back up that tenacity, and Google the persistence to see things through.
Ideas don’t mean *hit without monetization.
I think we’re forgetting that Apple made $18.3 Billion in profits a couple of quarters ago. Google will never come close to that.
The amazing thing is that from the very beginning, people have pointed out that Android, like Windows, is set up for a race to the bottom among the handset manufacturers. And yet the Android smartphone manufacturers somehow decided that what happened in Windows PCs isn’t going to happen to them. How they rationalized this to themselves is a mystery to me.
I don’t think Apple will be going down anytime soon. For many reasons:
1) iPhone sales are just going up, because most iPhone users like iPhones simple UI, and do not want the more complex features that Google provides. Also, the Chinese market of iPhones is growing, and they are making tons of money from these users.
2) The rumored iPad Pro will make the iPad actually seem like something we want again, and a rival to the Microsoft Surface is just what Apple needs to get the tablet market a jump start.
3) Macs are starting to be used more and more, and as more people make software compatible with both OSes, and more users with a Mac realize that they areable to run Windows on Mac, then the market will increase even more.
4) Apple creates buzz. It just does. iPhone 6 plastered the news for a full week, yet Samsung didn’t
I use iPhone and Mac, but in order of a company to be successful in the long(!) run, you have to do more. There is a growing demand for an personal assistant and an AI, Google is still not great in that business. I just can’t see people around the world, including India and Africa to use Siri as their personal AI, because everything Apple does is mainly focused on the US & few asian countries. What about the rest of the world? How can they name OS X El Captan, it doesn’t mean anything for an European. But again, a company like Google is way safer in the long run as they tend to enter tons of businesses, and the most important one – the business of personal data which is the oil of the 21st century. Do I like it? Who cares – the free market doesn’t judge things like that if something is evil or not. Google just made people dependant on their ecosystem, even if you use Apple devices. One wrong step and Apple will be nowhere. Remember even IBM declined, no company will hold its position for long. Google seems to be thinking century ahead with its bio-experiments and artificial intelligence. I guess soon Apple will enter the search engine business too, but nobody will know if they will be good or no. Google is expanding rapidly, Apple is tweaking and perfecting their old stuff, they lack a visionary like Steve. Just look out the Mac Pro and you’ll see the old cube refreshed, what is that, not an invention for sure.
Just FYI on your point on Africa and India other countries like that, the sturdiest smartphone markets are in the US, Europe, and China. And even though Google tries to innovate MORE, Apple still tries to innovate, but they are more methodical with their innovations, and they do it in fields they know they can strive in. For example, the Apple Watch is by far (in my opinion) the best smartwatch on the market. Also, since they have been in the music business since the iTunes and iPod, they decided to make Apple Music, and we have no clue as to whether that will be a success or not. Also, with the rumored iPad Pro or Apple TV 2.0 coming around, they will be adding more and more innovations to the list. In conclusion, Google innovates more, but Apple innovates well enough to keep it afloat.
PS Anyone who believes that Google owns the ad market, many apps have iAd banners on the top of the screen when playing, so Apple also has money coming in from ads
Sorry, India & Africa are not places a business that wants to make money would be focusing on. And if and when personal incomes rise over there, guess what smartphone will the newly affluent be dropping and which one they will switch to?
Then you say Google is safer in the long run because they enter tons of businesses. Of these tons of businesses they have entered (after search-based advertising), which ones are making them any real money? Hint: The answer starts with N, ends in E, and rhymes with “fun”.
Who won?
Interesting article, why do either have to fail? As I see it Apple is great at design and is a champion of privacy.
Google is great at seach and providing convenient information when you need it.
I’m sure there is room for both to grow and survive.
Obviously right now the iphone is Apples main engine and iphones won’t sell as well things will get bab faster for Apple.
In the end we are taking about the consumer space where things normally change, people simply follow trends and right now the iphone is in fashion but who knows what will the future bring as phone become more and more affordable.
Apple should prepare.
They don’t sell your information.
They sell anonymous access to you for targeted advertising and in return they give you a whole ecosystem of products for free.
No personal information about you is shared or sold to any company without your permission. You are going to be advertised to regardless wouldn’t you rather have ads that are relevant to your needs?
You can choose to sell your soul to the grea adverting devil, but don’t assume others do, and especially not me.
Still, its your information, is it not? I never said it was PERSONAL information, but it is still information collated about you on your devices. At least you agree that google farm its users for data to sell to advertisers. That point is irrefutable.
“wouldn’t you rather have ads that are relevant to your needs?” Now that mentality is why we need privacy laws. 1) I don’t want advertising shoved down my throat. 2) I don’t want advertising targeted at me by farming my own data. You sir have a problem if you think these actions are fine and dandy.
You make some valid points but I won’t be responding to your posts because I feel you may have some mental health issues and I don’t want to feed into your neurosis. I hope you well.
Ahh, the old “I can’t argue with facts so I’ll imply the other person has mental health issue”. Like pulling out the racist card when you’re losing. Typical of your kind.
Pity you don’t have any sort of facts to back up anything you care to throw up on any issue, instead you just babble on with utter bullshit and hope nobody pulls you up.
I’ll take your veiled personal swipe and a non response to any question put to you as a lack of any sort of intelligence to make a case, on anything. Feel free to put up any facts, now or in the future.
Cheers, enjoy your ignorant stupor.
Apple give their OS’s away for free, their syncing services for free, iCloud services for free, Applications for free, yet they don’t see the need to farm your data to make a living. I guess you have lower standards than most people then. Good for you.