You’re most probably familiar with the expression “out of the frying pan into the fire.”
Having seemingly settled its e-book price-fixing lawsuit by agreeing to pay $450 million, Tim Cook and other top Apple execs are now being sued by Apple shareholders, claiming that the incident has damaged the company.
As per a complaint filed at the end of last week, Cook and other Apple executives were told that they should accept “responsibility for ensnaring Apple in a multi-year anticompetitive scheme.”
The new lawsuit is called a “derivative suit,” which describes the corporate litigation available to shareholders who believe that a company’s board of directors won’t take the appropriate steps to protect it from mismanagement.
Often such suits are viewed as shakedowns used by law firms to extract easy money from giant companies, who are willing to settle to make the problem go away.
Given that Apple is seemingly going from strength-to-strength this year, it would seem to be hard to put together a case that Tim Cook is doing his job too badly.
The shareholder complaint can be read in full below:
Source: Gigaom
7 responses to “Apple shareholders sue Tim Cook over e-book conspiracy”
Damaged the company in what way? I had thought any e-Book negotiations would be but a miniscule amount to the company’s revenue. $450 million for a company with $150 billion in the bank adds up to a tiny, tiny amount. What type of Apple shareholders would sue over such a tiny amount of iTunes revenue being lost considering how well the rest of the company is doing
The idiot kind of shareholders.
The Apple kind of shareholders…
Ambulance chasing lawyers. “Hey, Apple’s got tons of money, let’s sue”
I take it these shareholders also smashed their iPads in protest as well.
This suit may damage Apple, I’m suing the the sewers
Do you mean to state that you intend to file suit against the plaintiffs in the aforementioned case? If so, your choice of words is very strange.