After outselling all Android Wear watches within 24 hours, Apple Watch looked set to be the device that would finally give smartwatches their big break. But according to a recent report, sales of Cupertino’s first wearable have since nosedived 90%.
It’s wise to take that report with a pinch of salt, but it got us thinking; if Apple’s first smartwatch really is a flop, which company can make a wearable worth wearing, and do wearable devices have a future at all?
Join us in this week’s Friday Night Fight between Cult of Android and Cult of Mac as we battle it out over that very question.
Killian Bell (Writer, Cult of Android): I’ve been interested in wearables for many years. I bought the original Pebble, I have a Moto 360 and previously owned other Android Wear watches, and I’ve got an Apple Watch, which I think is terrific.
But despite it initial success, the latter is currently being branded a flop, which again leads us to question whether wearable gadgets really have a future. What are you thoughts?
Luke Dormehl (Writer, Cult of Mac): Well, I think anyone claiming the Apple Watch is a flop based on the data we’ve seen so far is an idiot. Slice, which released the information suggesting sales had dropped 90% since launch, is only basing its figures on a fraction of the market based on e-receipts it personally analyzes.
Apple hasn’t released any numbers yet, although Jeff Williams has said Apple’s “happy” with them. I have used an Apple Watch, but I’m yet to buy one, since I don’t currently see enough differentiation from what my iPhone can do to make it worthwhile. But, like you, I’ve used a variety of wearables over the years. I’m currently using the new Jawbone UP 4.
My issue with wearables isn’t that there’s not the germ of a good idea there. There clearly is. My issue is that I don’t think we’ve necessarily found the form factor yet that’s going to make it the thing everyone’s excited about. I wasn’t convinced it was Google Glass-style glasses, and I’m not convinced it’s smartwatches either.
I’m not even sure the next big mass-market consumer technology is going to be worn on the body, despite everything we keep hearing about the coming wearables revolution.
KB: I’m glad we agree on the Apple Watch sales stories. It’s kind of funny that data like that makes big headlines, but I suppose when it comes to Apple’s latest devices, anything’s a story. I also agree that there is no future in Google Glass; very few people want to use a gadget that makes them look silly.
But I firmly believe that smartwatches are a good form factor, and that they have a great future ahead. The problem right now is that too many people expect too much from them. They’re an extension of our smartphones that make our lives easier in the simplest of ways, and that’s how it should be. Who wants to replace a smartphone with a wearable with a tiny display?

Photo: Jim Merithew/Cult of Mac
LD: That’s part of it. Here’s the thing, though — I think everyone’s thinking too small when it comes to wearables.
Basically for the past 30-40 years, tech has been stuck trying to bring us updated versions of things we already knew. The graphical user interface took as its metaphor the idea of an office — desktops, trash cans, etc. — which made us comfortable using them on a screen because we already used them in reality. The iPhone, meanwhile, wasn’t really a mobile phone but rather a computer that happened to make phone calls. But Apple sold it as a phone because that’s what people are familiar with.
Now we’re at the end of that narrative, I think. We don’t need to take items we’re already familiar with and give them a sci-fi makeover. Digital watches had already been largely replaced by the smartphone. Perhaps the one familiar area we still need reinventing is the car.
Wearables make sense as an example of something that we have that we can imagine being “smarter” but the problem is that no-one’s demanding it. It’s never going to be as big as smartphones because it’s totally non-essential. When people, possibly like yourself, talk about wearables like the smartwatch as being these great devices for controlling the smart home I feel you’re barking up the wrong tree. I’m more excited about devices like the Amazon Echo, to be honest
KB: But there are things smartwatches do that your iPhone can’t. Apple Watch is a terrific fitness tracker, one that not only tells you how many steps you’ve taken and what your heart rate is during a workout, but also motivates you to keep working out on a regular basis. It makes your smartphone even more useful, and even more integral.
But people need to realize that it’s a smartphone accessory, and not a do-it-all gadget out of Star Trek Wars that’s going to take over every other device you own. I think when that happens, smartwatches will be much more successful, and we won’t be continually questioning whether or not they have a future.
Yes, wearables are non-essential to most people, but so is the smartphone, so is the tablet, so is the TV. Many of us could live without these things, but they make our lives easier and more enjoyable, and smartwatches do the same.
LD: Sure. But you’re setting the bar very low here. You’re talking about smartwatches like they’re glorified selfie-sticks: things which are fun accessories for very specific circumstances. I’m talking about about the next big thing in tech.
A company like Apple either wants to create things which become the next iPhone, or help sell more iPhones. If you’re already lumping smartwatches into the latter category I think that proves why wearables aren’t ready to hit the big time yet. Simply put, there is very little that a smartwatch can currently do that a phone can’t. You can even get iPhone cases which can monitor your heart rate if that’s what you’re into.

Photo: Jim Merithew/Cult of Mac
KB: But what we’re debating here is whether smartwatches have a future. They don’t have to be “the next big thing in tech” to have a future. They can be hugely successful without being as revolutionary as the iPod or the iPhone.
I don’t believe Apple only wants to sell products that are as successful as the iPhone. If that was true, why does it continue to pursue the Apple TV, and why hasn’t it ditched the iPod and the Mac mini already?
You can get iPhone cases that monitor heart rate, but not everyone wants to workout with an iPhone. That’s why there are other digital watches with heart rate monitors built-in. But Apple Watch does so much more. It may not be groundbreaking, but it packs a ton of innovation that many people overlook. Force Touch and the Taptic Engine are excellent — and they’ve already made their way into other Apple devices. The Digital Crown is incredibly intuitive. And how many watches let you swap straps in 30 seconds at the touch of a button?
The biggest problem smartwatches face right now is that the vast majority of consumers don’t really understand them. But like a lot of other Apple products, it just makes sense when you use it.
LD: I can’t entirely agree. The truth is that there are plenty of businesses Apple could get into that it could break even on or make a slight profit on. But based on the hype wearables have gotten, they’re not meant to be a niche product that’s only ever going to improve certain aspects of your phone.
I think a good parallel is going to turn out to be the Newton. At first glance, that makes it sound like I’m slating it. The first-gen Newton was a flop, but it turned out to be a hugely influential device once its best ideas came of age and were moved to the right device.
I think that’s going to be the future of smartwatches too. Health-tracking, home automation, all these exciting fields are going to fit far better into other products — whether it’s additional features on your smartphone or standalone devices like the Echo which serve as the hub to our new smart homes.
KB: Well, we’ll have to wait and see, but I’m confident that wearables — smartwatches in particular — will be around a long time. I don’t think Apple would have made the Apple Watch if it didn’t believe that, either. I’m not denying they don’t need improvement, and that will come as the technology improves. But having used a smartwatch for all kinds of things over the past couple of years, my smartphone just wouldn’t feel complete without one now.
I think it would be a good idea to turn it over to the readers at this point. What are your thoughts on smartwatches? Will we still be wearing them in five years, or will we look back and wonder what all these technology giants were thinking?
Friday Night Fights is a series of weekly death matches between two no-mercy brawlers who will fight to the death — or at least agree to disagree — about which is better: Apple or Google, iOS or Android?
27 responses to “Wearables: Doomed or darlings of the next decade?”
Dormehl, clueless.
I’ve never liked him either.
If you are searching for extra cash averaging 50 bucks to 300 bucks a day for doing an online job at your home for several hrs daily then check this out…
If you search for extra paycheck on the side averaging 50 dollars to 300 dollars every day for doing an online job at your home for few hrs a day then check this out…
Dusty, “clean up” your act- lulz.
Clickbait writer.
I think wearables / watches will be OK but there is nothing block buster about them right now and they have a few limitations that keep me from buying one. I have worn a watch for a long time. I am very used to just glancing at it to see the time. In this aspect the current generation Apple Watch is a no-go for me. I don’t feel the need to learn a wrist motion when I can just glance at the time like I did now while typing.
I have seen a couple of Apple Watches in the wild. Still odd to me to see just a black rectangle as they were not active and showing the time. At least on the current Android watches they have a low power mode so it is still being a basic watch even when just sitting on your wrist.
My watch is solar powered, atomic and water resistant. I swim with it no problems and since I am never opening the case to deal with the battery I don’t have to worry about that seal either. Shows time with second hand (analog and digital if you want) day of week, month, day of month and current DST mode. Has alarms and stop watch.
What it does not do is stop boredom. I would love to have a watch that I could change the watch face on from time to time and that will show me current weather and maybe potential weather over next 24 hours or few days.
I do mobile development but I am not a phone junky. Don’t get tons of notifications during the day but I would like to have a quick glance at the type of notification that came in – IM or phone or email – and to do quick IM replies.
I think as soon as Apple makes the Apple Watch a standalone device that can take a micro SIM card, that will open up a whole new world of possibilities. I for one would be opt to purchase an Apple Watch that had my cellphone number in it (SIM card) which basically replaced my iPhone. I would then carry my iPad as my daily “larger screen” device. When I’m on the go, I don’t really need an iPhone, and if I do, I’ll break out the iPad. Combined your Apple Watch/iPad combo with siri voice controls, the cross platform messaging/phone call integration, and bluetooth headset/bluetooth car speakerphone….you’ve got a winner.
Maybe for you or a few, for the rest, it’s a dumb move to put a SIM in a watch. Samsung had it and FAILED.
Mobile technology is moving away from SIM cards to dedicated chips.
I also think it is funny for people thinking smartwatches are a flop especially the Apple Watch. I have been into watched for decades but never had the big money lying around to collect them. I can say I have seen more Apple Watches in the wild in there early life than I have seen any other smartwatch out there. I do own one myself and love being able to use it to multitask with it when I am using my phone for something else. Of course will slow down after the front runners rushed to get it now it is in the wild it will start to find its normal pace. I have many friends who will be getting one they are just waiting till after a few summer expenses go away.
“Wearables: Doomed or darlings of the next decade?”
Neither. Just a technology some people will embrace, and others will not. Making it an all-or-nothing question and issue is just click-bait hyperbole.
No?!! Luke writing clickbait??!! Never!!
Technology writers speculating about technology? I’ll be darned!
Come on Luke, be honest. You put a lot of effort in creating the headline “sensational” because it gets clicks, which brings revenue. We’re not stupid.
Notwithstanding the fact that I didn’t write this headline, I agree that there is a fine line to be trodden between interesting headlines and clickbait. With that said, it’s not always the easiest thing in the world to write one that sums up an entire article in a snappy sub-10 words. Sorry if you were disappointed on this occasion, but your oddly aggressive tone doesn’t really add much that’s constructive, does it?
Forgive a person for being frustrated and sick to death of clickbait headlines Luke, deliberately sensationalised just to get clicks. Be honest and admit this is true at least. As a writer, if you don’t agree with the headline written then you should object to the editor, because it makes you look bad, not the editor. Don’t you think people are sick and tired of all this?
Okay, I’m going to again point out that this is not my article, it is one that I am quoted in. Look at the byline. I also fail to see how this is clickbait. A provocative headline? Yes. Promising something that’s not there? (i.e. “Guess which mass-market tech product won’t be around in a decade”) No. I do appreciate what you’re saying, but I don’t think this is the best example of an article where it’s true. If I’ve written something you feel to be misleading, comment in the article and I’m more than happy to discuss it though.
You have totally missed my point. My point was about how CoM has turned to using clickbait headlines and troll bait stories to get clicks. Well let me tell you, after the totally irrelevant story on pillows, I’m done. CoM has been removed from my favourites, and I won’t be coming back. And I have bought items under special deals on this site in the past. No more. So whatever you say or think, it doesn’t matter anymore. I’m done, as have many others. Good job. Good luck.
Anyone can write down to their readers, but it takes a true writer to write to their readers.
It could be due to the entry price: $349/$399 is quiet high to cough out for an iPhone accessory. I strongly believe if it was like $249/$299 or even $279/$329, it would’ve been a different story. First iPhone didn’t really take off until the price was slashed.
Any good timepiece will set you back $300+, unless you want a $50 Casio. Horses for courses. Those who buy $50 Casio watches won’t buy any sort of expensive watch, let alone a smart watch, or a $10,000 Rolex.
the point is that most people abandoned timepiece nowadays. So, buying Apple watch is no longer for telling time solely, but many other functions that synchronizes with iPhone. That means it’s mostly a phone accessory, not time piece. Again, accessory at this price point is really tough to sell.
Most people under 25-30 weren’t bought up with the need for a watch, so a smart watch will need to give them more than what their phones do. Convienience. I’ve worn a watch all my working life, so it’s second nature to look at my wrist 4-5 times an hour. I do have an Apple watch and it is convenient for me. I can’t always stop what I’m doing to check my phone. Since wearing the watch, I can, and I do complete simple tasks easier and quicker than I would by pulling out my phone. I actually find it annoying when I do have to pull out my phone. Is it worth the $500+ for convenience? Probably not, but I won’t be selling it, that’s for sure. It is a great productive accessory for my work situation, but I wouldn’t buy one if I didn’t have a need for it.
When the iPhone was released, it sold like crazy. So far, smart watches have not. There’s your answer.
For a product to be successful its target demographic needs to grasp its utility immediately. All of this “wait and see ” nonsense from the insular tech community- which continues to tell the rest of us that we just don’t understand- is annoying, to say the least. What you guys need to understand is that not everyone cares about dimming the lights at home from their wrist, not everyone can see the utility in these niche products.
Apple & co. may continue to plug away at these devices (I hope not), but we’re years away from the kind of functionality people want in them. Maybe decades. Because these watches are, for the most part, $350+ accessories for $600+ phones, most people will avoid them. There’s no “must-have” feature. No one can give me a good reason why I should buy one.
Why is it easier to flick my wrist than it is to glance at my phone? Why should I buy a watch that will be obsolete in a year at the same price point as a watch I could pass on to any kids or grandkids I might someday have? Why should I buy the fragile, soon-to-be-obsolete Apple version, when Garmin, etc. make cheaper, more durable fitness bands with similar functionality (minus Instagram & Minecraft)? Why would I send anyone my heartbeat? Did Apple make this product for tech-savvy adults or for 12 year-olds?
How long will Apple/Samsung, etc. support the hardware? Two years? Three years? What happens to my $350- $700+ Apple Watch when Apple inevitably stops updating it and it no longer works with the current generation iPhone? Do they buy it back? Does it get recycled? Will I need to buy a new one every two years when I upgrade my phone? Does Apple expect us to pay up front for the phone (since carrier subsidies are going away) and buy a new watch, too, so that what was once a $200 or $300 expenditure is now $1000 to $1500?
Any company wanting to convince the majority of people to buy one of these things either has to greatly expand its functionality and provide reasonable future-proofing, or greatly lower the price while offering upgrades of the device internals. Apple has its work cut out for it.
original iPhone ain’t sold crazy. It took 2.5 months to reach first million units and at the time it’s discontinued 4 years later, it’s sold total ~ 6.1 mil units. Get your fact straight.
since the dawn of the computer all that has been done to it is refine it and that is going to keep happening the major invasions were already made. Now its about tweaks. The watch sold to everyone who had to have one the rest of us could care less. we have an iPhone and thats enough.
when wearables have a much longer battery life and are on all the time then ill consider it, but I think we are many many years away from that and until then I think wearables is mor a fad than anything else.