John Sculley: The Secrets of Steve Jobs’ Success [Exclusive Interview]

Drawing_Sculley

John Sculley, Apple's ex-CEO, talks for the first time about Steve Jobs. Illustration by Matthew Phelan.

In 1983, Steve Jobs wooed Pepsi executive John Sculley to Apple with one of the most famous lines in business: “Do you want to spend the rest of your life selling sugared water or do you want a chance to change the world?”

Jobs and Sculley ran Apple together as co-CEOs, blending cutting edge technology (the first Mac) with cutting edge advertising (the famous 1984 ad) and world-class design. But it soon soured, and Sculley is best known today for forcing Jobs’ resignation after a boardroom battle for control of the company.

Now, for the first time, Sculley talks publicly about Steve Jobs and the secrets of his success. It’s the first interview Sculley has given on the subject of Steve Jobs since he was forced out of the company in 1993.

“There are many product development and marketing lessons I learned working with Steve in the early days,” says Sculley. “It’s impressive how he still sticks to his same first principles years later.”

He adds, “I don’t see any change in Steve’s first principles — except he’s gotten better and better at it.”

I met with Sculley in a hotel lobby near Oakland airport. Sculley had been taking meetings for his investment fund and was waiting for a flight back home on the east coast.

Sculley was initially reluctantly to talk about Steve Jobs, his former partner at Apple, who had been both his protégé and mentor.

“I don’t have any contact with Steve these days,” Sculley said in one of our initial emails setting up the meeting. “He’s still mad he got pushed out of Apple 22 years ago… I have no interest to piss him off… My Apple experience is now ancient history and I have gone on with my life and I’m not looking for any publicity or have any ax to grind.”

I persuaded Sculley that I was a big fan of Jobs, and had no interest in digging dirt. What I wanted to know was: How does he do it?

During the resulting 90-minute conversation, Sculley divulged Jobs’s first principles. Here, in Sculley’s words, is Steve Jobs’ methodology for building great products:

John Sculley: The Secrets of Steve Jobs’ Success [Exclusive Interview]

Steve Jobs circa 1984. Illustration by Matthew Phelan.

1. Beautiful design – “We both believed in beautiful design and Steve in particular felt that you had to begin design from the vantage point of the experience of the user… We used to study Italian designers… We were looking at Italian car designers. We really did study the designs of cars that they had done and looking at the fit and finish and the materials and the colors and all of that. At that time, nobody was doing this in Silicon Valley. It was the furthest thing on the planet from Silicon Valley back then in the 80’s. Again, this is not my idea. I could relate to it because of my interest and background in design, but it was totally driven by Steve… What a lot of people didn’t realize was that Apple wasn’t just about computers. It was about designing products and designing marketing and it was about positioning.”

2. Customer experience – “He always looked at things from the perspective of what was the user’s experience going to be? … The user experience has to go through the whole end-to-end system, whether it’s desktop publishing or iTunes. It is all part of the end-to-end system. It is also the manufacturing. The supply chain. The marketing. The stores.”

3. No focus groups — “Steve said: ‘How can I possibly ask somebody what a graphics-based computer ought to be when they have no idea what a graphic based computer is? No one has ever seen one before.’ He believed that showing someone a calculator, for example, would not give them any indication as to where the computer was going to go because it was just too big a leap. ”

3. Perfectionism – “He was also a person that believed in the precise detail of every step. He was methodical and careful about everything — a perfectionist to the end.”

4. Vision – “He believed that the computer was eventually going to become a consumer product. That was an outrageous idea back in the early 1980’s because people thought that personal computers were just smaller versions of bigger computers. That’s how IBM looked at it. Some of them thought it was more like a game machine because there were early game machines, which were very simple and played on televisions… But Steve was thinking about something entirely different. He felt that the computer was going to change the world and it was going to become what he called “the bicycle for the mind.” It would enable individuals to have this incredible capability that they never dreamed of before. It was not about game machines. It was not about big computers getting smaller… He was a person of huge vision.”

5. Minimalism – “What makes Steve’s methodology different from everyone else’s is that he always believed the most important decisions you make are not the things you do – but the things that you decide not to do. He’s a minimalist.”

“He’s a minimalist and is constantly reducing things to their simplest level. It’s not simplistic. It’s simplified. Steve is a systems designer. He simplifies complexity.”

6. Hire the best – “Steve had this ability to reach out to find the absolute best, smartest people he felt were out there. He was extremely charismatic and extremely compelling in getting people to join up with him and he got people to believe in his visions even before the products existed… He always reached out for the very best people he could find in the field. And he personally did all the recruiting for his team. He never delegated that to anybody else. ”

7. Sweat the details – “On one level he is working at the ‘change the world,’ the big concept. At the other level he is working down at the details of what it takes to actually build a product and design the software, the hardware, the systems design and eventually the applications, the peripheral products that connect to it… He’s always adamantly involved in the advertising, the design and everything.”

8. Keep it small – “The other thing about Steve was that he did not respect large organizations. He felt that they were bureaucratic and ineffective. He would basically call them “bozos.” That was his term for organizations that he didn’t respect.

… Steve had a rule that there could never be more than one hundred people on the Mac team. So if you wanted to add someone you had to take someone out. And the thinking was a typical Steve Jobs observation: “I can’t remember more than a hundred first names so I only want to be around people that I know personally. So if it gets bigger than a hundred people, it will force us to go to a different organization structure where I can’t work that way. The way I like to work is where I touch everything.” Through the whole time I knew him at Apple that’s exactly how he ran his division. ”

9. Reject bad work – “It’s like an artist’s workshop and Steve is the master craftsman who walks around and looks at the work and makes judgments on it and in many cases his judgments were to reject something.

… An engineer would bring Steve in and show him the latest software code that he’s written. Steve would look at it and throw it back at him and say: “It’s just not good enough.” And he was constantly forcing people to raise their expectations of what they could do. So people were producing work that they never thought they were capable of… Steve would shift between being highly charismatic and motivating and getting them excited to feel like they are part of something insanely great. And on the other hand he would be almost merciless in terms of rejecting their work until he felt it had reached the level of perfection that was good enough to go into – in this case, the Macintosh.”

10. Perfection – “The thing that separated Steve Jobs from other people like Bill Gates — Bill was brilliant too — but Bill was never interested in great taste. He was always interested in being able to dominate a market. He would put out whatever he had to put out there to own that space. Steve would never do that. Steve believed in perfection.”

11. Systems thinker – “The iPod is a perfect example of Steve’s methodology of starting with the user and looking at the entire end-to-end system. It was always an end-to-end system with Steve. He was not a designer but a great systems thinker. That is something you don’t see with other companies. They tend to focus on their piece and outsource everything else.

If you look at the state of the iPod, the supply chain going all the way over to iPod city in China – it is as sophisticated as the design of the product itself. The same standards of perfection are just as challenging for the supply chain as they are for the user design. It is an entirely different way of looking at things.”

BTW: The interview with Sculley was awfully gratifying to me personally because many of his points coincided with points I’d made in my book about Jobs: Inside Steve’s Brain. I’d written chapters devoted to Jobs’ perfectionism, minimalism and elitism, and how they have shaped Apple’s business. A major part of the book is devoted to the systems Jobs has built. It was strange but thrilling to hear ideas I’d formulated independently expounded by a former Apple CEO and someone who’d worked with Jobs so closely.

Read the full interview here: John Sculley On Steve Jobs, The Full Interview Transcript

DON'T MISS
John Sculley On Steve Jobs: CultofMac’s Exclusive Interview

Apps you might like

  • Mark Gary Blumenthal, MD, MPH

    Everything in this lovely interview only makes me appreciate John Sculley more and admire Steve Jobs more. Two superb professionals who believe in and practice customer-focused excellence for profit. Capitalism at its best. Bravo!

    • http://deoclicianocgiportfolio.wordpress.com Deocliciano Okssipin Vieira

      What?

      Creativity ( now even HP looks like Apple machines ) & Humanism ( Yeah!, well Apple is in China, but the Windows cartel is there also.) @ its BEST!.

      Capitalism is inherently human.
      Communism ( itself a form of capitalism where the state is the religion ) was an attempted shot at religions.

      • Ilias

        You clearly have no idea what you are talking about or even what this article is about. LMAO at “Communism ( itself a form of capitalism where the state is the religion )” Time to go back to school.. not that it will do you any good.. I don’t believe you know the meaning of the word humanism, much less have ever really studied any humanities or social sciences.

  • http://www.kamilstudios.com Kamil Studios

    Steve Jobs is great. His methodology especially his perfectionism always made him unique. Just imagine what would happen to the computer technology if Steve is not around.

  • J

    Excellent. Made me think different about John Scully.

    • itsmneyc

      Not me. He supposedly realized how brilliant Steve was but got rid of him anyway because his ego was too big. This sent Apple on a downward spiral. It was only because Steve came back that Apple was saved. Looks like he was only good enough to sell sugar water after all…

      • 1000daysoframen

        wander over to wikipedia and check out sculley’s ventures since his apple debacle. he has many failures under his belt – he should have never left pepsi… i don’t think this was a guy prepared to run a tech company…

  • Ictus75

    “The thing that separated Steve Jobs from other people like Bill Gates — Bill was brilliant too — but Bill was never interested in great taste. He was always interested in being able to dominate a market. He would put out whatever he had to put out there to own that space. Steve would never do that.”

    This says it all, the difference between Steve & Bill (and everyone else).

    I remember buying one of the 1st iMac’s and just thinking how beautiful it was. And the whole user experience was that way. It was so much more than having just a square gray box. That sold me on the whole Apple experience, and I’m still sold on it today. Apple’s not perfect, but they work at such higher standards than everyone else and there is a sense of elegance in everything they do. I realize that sense is not for everyone, and that’s fine.

    • http://deoclicianocgiportfolio.wordpress.com Deocliciano Okssipin Vieira


      Bill was brilliant too — but Bill was never interested in great taste. He was always interested in being able to dominate a market. He would put out whatever he had to put out there to own that space

      That defines Apple and Microsoft.
      Like a lackluster fame savvy pop singer vs Bob Dylan.

      In the pop savvy world success is measured by the amount of gold records, in the Bob Dylan world success is less measurable in term of possession.

      • RunCat

        I tend to disagree that Bill Gates ever intended to dominate a market. With his initial deal with IBM, his plan was to sell the OS and he got lucky in that IBM allowed him to also sell it to others. This deal enabled MSFT to move into a dominating position in OS which they used to push the rest of their product line. I don’t think MSFTs plan was to dominate as much as it became, almost accidentally, their operating procedure since it worked and they could.

  • Will

    IMO, Steve drives Apple to develop consumer electronic products that adhere to the utmost consumer desires of elegant form, fit and function. He understands that if the company designs a “widget” that consumers love to use and price it appropriately, the market will accept it and make it into a raving success. Apple provides their customers with great consumer electronics experiences not just a product to fill a need.

    • jon

      Waaaa? What a bunch of sycophantic drivel… I agree with the principles 100% but the reality is completely different.

      I just spent three days transferring my itunes library to a new computer, and upwards of 5 hrs on the phone with apple support (I’m not a rocket scientist, but I run my own small business server without nearly as many problems as this crappy software).

      If itunes is supposed to be an ambassador for the rest of the apple suite, you can keep it.

      Do like the iphone4 though – its purdy – just wish it wasn’t tied to a millstone.

      • Denis

        Are you serious? 5 hours? All you need to do is copy the itunes folder from the old computer to the new computer.

        That is it. Period.

  • SierraHotel

    What is amazing to me is that Apple does not seem to have lost it’s vision and zeal… even after a decade of home runs and exponential growth. It’s hard to be as nimble and driven as a start up when you are a company of this size. In fact, I really don’t recall a similar instance where a large corporation has maintained dominance via innovation and leading edge design… instead of just crushing competitors the old fashioned way (think Standard Oil and Microsoft). Steve Jobs is an iconic figure in American business, his visionary acumen and leadership abilities will be studied for decades.

  • Mike Evangelist

    Leander,

    Great job distilling this insightful list. It precisely matches what I personally observed about the way Steve operates, and does a better job of explaining it than all the BS books/articles which have previously attempted to divine magical explanations of what Steve does.

    Mike

  • Nimi Lukeni

    Lovely article, i do have your book “Inside Steve’s Brain”, i always waited for someone like Mr. Sculley to speak forward about Steve Jobs. I am a huge fan o Apple Inc. and i admire so much Steve Jobs, that i made him my idol.

    Thanks for the excellent interview(article) you gave us Mr Sculley and Mr. Kahney, you guys rock.

  • G4Dualie

    Admittedly, Sculley hasn’t seen, or spoken to Jobs in more than twenty-five years and he’s said some very nice things about the man, but Jobs has come a long way since those days. We know what Jobs has done with his life, but what has Sculley been up to, besides sleeping in airports between engagements?

    The man who betrayed his friend, his protege, and mentor, for his own political and financial interests, a Juda if you will, and after all these years makes no apology for his behavior for throwing a man out of his own home?

    Bite me, Sculley!

    • RunCat

      perhaps. . .however, SJ’s time in the wilderness has served him well. He returned a much better manager and leader of Apple.

    • J

      Its Judas not Juda.

  • mcdaidusa

    Great article. It still amazes me that someone as talented as Steve Jobs could be voted out of his own company, and that Sculley was partially responsible for this. I find it reassuring that Steve Jobs’ success will inspire other young businessmen to follow his example and avoid the route that Bill Gates took.

  • JC3

    G4Dualie,

    I think you mean “Judas”. Actually, Sculley didn’t fire Jobs from Apple. It was the board of directors who chose Sculley over Jobs because of his experience.

  • http://www.fuzzypig.com Fuzzypiggy

    Confirms what we know, when you buy Apple you don’t buy a tool or a device, you buy into an experience. That experience starts with the dedication that people at the very top to the very bottom of the chain, put into that product. The little details make the experience, like the tiny little bit of plastic that’s wrapped around every cable you get with an Apple product, that attention to detail is planned from day one. Even if you only buy a tiny iPod Nano, you’re still made to feel as important as the guy whose just bought the suped up Mac Pro with 8TB of disk space and 16 processors.

    That’s what those who shun Apple, will never understand.

  • http://twitter.com/chrisfoxdesign Chris Fox

    Thanks for the article, great stuff. I particularly liked the iPod supply chain observations. Great under-the-covers stuff.

  • veggiedude

    Jobs was fired as CEO but remained on as chairman and a board member. He quit that position on his own. No one pushed him out.

  • http://rhymes-nursery.editorial.co.in/ Prerna

    does scully now wants his job back or there is something else behind this……..

  • Rom

    Hey Leander. Cool post!

    I did read your book “Inside Steve’s brain”, which I loved. I read this article without noticing you were its author, and I thought of your book immediately on several occasions!

    Sculley is good sports, me likey.

  • jarasek

    The biggest paradox is that Mr. Sculley (or Mr. Evil for some of us) who kicked out Steve from his own company should be considered as the Creator of The New Steve.

    Sometimes in life we should be thankfull for people who kicked us in the butt :-)

  • NoKoolAidForMe

    The fawning going on in these comments makes me want to gag! (I feel as if Apple PR Depart. set its interns loose. Fuzzypiggy… “you buy into an experience” ? Uhhhhh, spare me.) People – please read some history books on this topic (besides this one little article). E.g. Accidental Millionaire by Lee Butcher. Steve Jobs was a tyrannical, spoiled brat who nearly wrecked Apple early on. He stole the LISA/Mac concept from PARC. Then, Sculley and others nearly wrecked Apple in the 90′s – with the disaster they called the Newton and “accounting irregularities” that drove the stock into the dumps. Having bought one of the Newtons and having owned a LOT of AAPL stock I was personally affected by both of these. No love lost here for Sculley. As fun and well designed as the early Mac were (I was an SE/30 owner), the architecture was proprietary/closed and the software was expensive to buy and expensive to develop. Unfortunately, Steve is doing the same thing today with the iPhone, iPod (ala iTunes) and the iPad (you may only develop for these platforms using a Mac and you may only purchase software through Apple).

  • mergatroid

    An important part of the user experience that I believe Jobs (and those Italian auto designers) have ignored is that not everyone has the expendable income to be able to afford a Mac or a Ferrari. Its nice that somebody is making these things and that maybe some of the innovations will “trickle down” to the rest of us, but, yep, they’re still somewhat elitist. That said, I’d still opt for the Ferrari over the Fiat.

  • Kyle

    @Ilias LOL @ presenting social sciences or humanities as elitist subjects, and shoving it in that guys face.

    For the most part “Social Sciences” are what folks study who could barely make it through high school (communications, sociology etc.. ), or those that just don’t care about school all that much (e.g. athletes). The exception would be studying these for personal enrichment/hobbies, and those with a *true* interest in the subject. By a great margin, Engineering, Math, Physics, Comp Sci and REAL sciences are much more intellectually stimulating/challenging.

    Soft sciences, many times, have no ‘real’ provable components… so everyone is an expert Yay! How cute. :P

  • jeff

    The quote, “Steve Jobs observation: I can’t remember more than a hundred first names so I only want to be around people that I know personally” is suspiciously like Gladwell’s rule of 150 (or Dunbar’s number), which states that the optimal number of individuals in a society that someone can have real social relationships with is 150. To quote from the Gladwell’s book Tipping Point, “Groups of less than 150 members usually display a level of intimacy, interdependency”

  • Richard

    NoKoolAidForMe – Thank you. I was starting to get nauseated. Still remember when I almost bought a Lisa. Fortunately I couldn’t quite afford it.

  • http://www.civilized.com garty knott

    Well, The mac (Os-6,7,8,9) was certainly simple (superficially), and
    the gui interface was simple – and simplistic, but it was really a mess
    at the level of the “toolboxes”. And feeble in functionality and
    full of idiosyncratic data-structures and organizational ideas.
    At that time, Unix, for all its flaws, was the most elegant, and
    powerful OS extant – and (sadly?) still is.

    OS-10 is unix (proving my point?) but the GUI-layering is still a mess.
    (try to follow exactly what happens when you click on an icon to
    run the associated program.)

    Steve Jobs greatest management achievment was the NeXT machine,
    and even there, many of his decisions were wrong and had to be fixed. His
    great contribution was to assemble a good team, to go with Unix,
    and to act as a critical voice (i.e. as a critic) in shaping the GUI design.

  • Cam

    Great article. Sheds some light on parts of that business relationship between those two that I didn’t know.

  • H

    I don’t think it is not key to know how Steve jobs was some 20+ years ago. He is not like that any more. So the whole interview seems more like people archaeology then some real useful information, which explains Jobs current activities. It is basically irrelevant and may only be of interest for hard core Apple fanatics. Jobs of today is more important to understand than that kid some 20+ years ago. Today we see Apple and Jobs impersonating it, a company to strive for full control of what users do. In the past Jobs, well Apple, was a company being so much different in their thinking and products, than the stuff from Microsoft. Now it seems Jobs has learned from its admired opponent Gates. Apple products of today take full control, do not accept widely accepted standards of interfacing, basically giving users a hard time doing what they want to do with their products. Owning an Iphone myself, I think it is the most evil product I have ever bought. I can’t thing I like to do, I have to use software (e.g. iTunes) I don’t like to use. Be real, Jobs has turned to the evil side! And looking little closer at Apple’s products of today, you will notice more and more usability related issues.

  • Will-Smith

    In my opinion, Steve Jobs, is genius in knowing that there are people who are willing to pay for things looking beautiful and great user experience, sometimes more than twice the price of an item that does the same but looking boxy etc..
    I am an engineer, and am involved in creating the functionality and making things happen that dont exist. But it takes more time ( not creative genius, and its tedious ) to make that functionality look beautiful & keep it simple and stupid). When steve is giving you something, he is simply taking away lot of the options that are made possible by great engineering, sometimes are distracting for normal(stupid) person(EX. all macs in silver color only when there are million colors, iphone – no usb or mem card option, etc) . But they have money to pay for that experience. This is in no way taking a jab at Jobs, he has created a billion dollar company but pointing out what he does in my opinion.

  • http://www.lpearls.com wisdom

About the author

Leander Kahney

is the editor and publisher of Cult of Mac, and author of three books about technology culture: Inside Steve’s Brain, the New York Times bestseller about Steve Jobs; Cult of Mac; and Cult of iPod. Leander has written for Wired, MacWeek, Scientific American, and The Guardian in London. Follow Leander on Twitter @lkahney and Facebook.

(sorry, you need Javascript to see this e-mail address)| Read more posts by .

Posted in Apple, News, Steve Jobs, Top stories | Tagged: , , , |