2016 has not exactly been a spectacular year for Apple. There have been some nice highlights, like major changes to the MacBook Pro lineup and the wildly successful AirPods, but it hasn’t really been a year to remember for fans or investors.
Will 2017 be different? We know the next-generation iPhone will be big, but does Apple have more up its sleeve that will help turn around its fortunes and make the next year a spectacular one?
Join us in this week’s Friday Night Fight as we battle it out over Apple in 2017.
Killian Bell: 2016 wasn’t a particularly good year for Apple, but this certainly isn’t the start of a miserable demise. I’m confident Apple will turn things around in 2017 and that we’ll be having a very different conversation this time next year.
The next-generation iPhone alone will be enough to revitalize Apple’s smartphone business. It’s the iPhone’s 10th anniversary, and you can be sure Apple has something special planned for that. This is probably the reason why this year’s iPhone upgrade was a little dull.
Recent rumors have promised the iPhone 8 will offer an all-new design with curved glass and the iPhone’s first OLED displays. And it almost certainly won’t be the only major refresh we see from Apple this year; we’re due big iPad and Mac upgrades, too.
I’m also expecting something completely new from Apple over the next 12 months. I don’t think we’ll see the fruits of its smart car efforts just yet, but I do think the company will finally dip its toes into virtual reality — probably alongside the iPhone 8.
How do you think 2017 will play out for Apple? Do you think it will do enough to turn its fortunes around?
Luke Dormehl: I think we can agree on this not being the beginning of the end for Apple. People have been predicting Apple’s demise for years and, simply put, it’s not going to happen. Just today I wrote about Microsoft’s early-2000s fall from grace after it hit its stock peak in December 1999. The following year its stock crashed by 60 percent. Today, it’s once again back to those 1999 highs.
As a business, Apple is way too big and diversified to fail. Yes, iPhones account for the majority of its revenue, but spin virtually any of its businesses off as their own company and you’ve got a giant in its own right. The fact that Apple can meet falling iPhone sales by growing its Services business shows that this — if its previous jumps hadn’t already shown it — is a company that can adapt.
But the question is whether the indisputably disappointing 2016 is like 1996: another poor year for Apple that prefigured the massive turnaround spurred on by Steve Jobs’ return? I don’t want to be a downer, but I’m not sure it will. Apple today seems to be a weirdly risk averse company. It appears to have lost interest in the Mac division — unlike the chances companies like Microsoft are taking with the Surface Studio; not got any worldchanging ideas for turning around slowing iPad demand; and appears content to iterate rather than innovate.
Could there be some massive secret project that could make the company exciting again in 2017, ten years after it shook the world with the iPhone? Of course, but nothing about Apple’s position today says that it’s a company which is interested in making big changes as it was forced to in the late 1990s. On a shareholder level, Apple’s still raking in money. I’m sure the AirPods shipping debacle will trigger sorting out some logistics and manufacturing problems… but you’re still going to have the same group at the top who have been running Apple for 15+ years.
Can you honestly say that you see major philosophical changes in Apple’s future? It doesn’t seem like a company that’s hungry any more… and that’s a problem for a brand that has always been viewed as giving us perfectly-tuned “must have” products that leave everyone else in the dust.
Killian: Well, not every company bounces back — just look at BlackBerry. But I certainly don’t think Apple will be following suit. As you rightly point out, it’s too big, and maybe it’s not taking big risks now, but I think it would be willing to if things weren’t going well.
Not everything Apple does is a safe bet, though. Just this year it made controversial moves like switching exclusively to USB-C and adding a Touch Bar to the MacBook Pro, and ditching the iPhone’s headphone jack to make those products better than ever before. And those things paid off; iPhone 7 is selling as well as Apple could have hoped for an incremental upgrade, and the MacBook Pro is Apple’s fastest-selling pro machine to date.
I don’t think Apple has lost interest in the Mac, either. It certainly seems like its focus has been elsewhere in recent years, but I don’t think you could call the 12-inch MacBook or the new MacBook Pro boring. What’s more, Tim Cook has promised exciting upgrades for the iMac line which will likely surface in 2017.
With regards to the iPad, I think Apple has probably just accepted that there’s little it can do to boost tablet adoption. Consumers just don’t buy them as frequently as they buy smartphones, no matter how exciting the latest iPad is. Until Apple makes a device like the Surface Pro that runs a hybrid of iOS and macOS (which we know it won’t do), the iPad will never be a laptop replacement.
I don’t think we can say Apple isn’t interested in making big changes, though. You only have to take a look at its latest patents to see Apple is working on incredibly exciting things behind the scenes. Most of them will never turn into anything, but it only needs one groundbreaking idea to surface in 2017 to change everything.
It’s hard to say whether you can predict big philosophical changes because Apple is so secretive. Do you think fans could have predicted big changes in the past?
Luke: I think it was easy to see that Steve Jobs was going to swing for the fences when he took over as CEO. It’s revisionist history to say it was obviously going to be as successful as it became, but it was obvious that it was going to be an exciting ride. Right from the off, he eliminated products that weren’t working on and started on a whole slate of new products. It was about ego as much as anything, and when you’re looking to make an impact in a stagnant industry it’s a very different scenario to the one Apple finds itself in today.
I think what you’ve identified are areas Apple could innovate in. I absolutely think it’s possible. They’ve got an insanely talented team there, arguably the best product designers in the tech industry, and a whole host of other people waiting in the wings. The cash pile is big enough that Apple could acquire — and acqui-hire — any company or talent it wants, and because so much revenue is being brought in by the iPhone it could afford to take risks elsewhere.
I hope 2016 is going to be a wakeup call. I recently wrote a post for Cult of Mac on all the ways Apple had disappointed in 2016. I thought I’d get torn apart in the comments section, but what was amazing is how many people agreed. And if you’re spending your days reading about Apple online, chances are that you’re a hardcore fan — who wants the company to do well.
Based on your post, let me turn it around and ask you whether you’re excited for 2017? And, if so, whether you think Apple is going to launch any products that will be more than incremental improvements? I really hope the iPhone 8 is great, but I also want Apple to remember that there is a userbase beyond people who buy phones. It seems like it’s forgotten that.
Killian: It’s a given that a new CEO is going to make big changes to a company that desperately needs saving. But can you think of a time since then when we could have predicted Apple was on the verge of making a massive shift?
I’m definitely excited for 2017. I think the iPhone 8 will be a massive upgrade, and I think we could also see some significant changes to the iMac, Mac mini, and Mac Pro. I’ve also mentioned that I think Apple will do something with virtual reality next year.
Let’s hand this over to the readers now. Do you think 2017 will be a big year for Apple, or do you think we’re in for another 12 months of less than spectacular product releases that we’ll be glad to see the back of?
Friday Night Fights is a series of weekly death matches between two no-mercy brawlers who will fight to the death — or at least agree to disagree — about which is better: Apple or Google, iOS or Android?
Killian Bell is a freelance writer based in the U.K. He has an interest in all things tech and also covers Android over at CultofAndroid.com. You can follow him on Twitter via @killianbell.
15 responses to “Will Apple turn around its fortunes in 2017?”
The thing is, Cook has said “something is special coming” before. And, sure, a product like, say, the Mac Pro was eventually delivered. However, Cook just let that device collect dust. And people to this day are still asking for the cheese grater to come back. Not sure I have faith in Tim Cook’s “just wait and see” stuff right now. I don’t think he has a strong track record in delivering like Steve had.
I’ve earned $84 ,000 by far this year working on the net and also I am only a full time student . I’m by making use of an online business opportunity I observed and even I’ve earned this kind of decent cash . It’s undoubtedly user-friendly and uncomplicated not to mention I am just so happy that I found out regarding it . The potential with this is endless . Here’s what exactly I do, please have a look at my account>>>
I’ve made $84 ,000 right now now working over the internet but I am only a full time university student . I’m by making use of a home based business opportunity I read about and after that I’ve made such good money . It’s seriously user-friendly and I am just very happy that I found out about it . The possibility of success with this is limitless . Here’s everything that I do, please have a look at my account>>>
I’ve earned $84 ,000 up till now this year working via internet however I am only a full time university student . I’m by making use of an online business marketing opportunity I found out about and additionally I’ve made such type of great money . It is seriously user friendly and I am just too glad that I found out about that . The possibility of success with this is end-less . Here’s what I do, please have a look at my account>>>
Two weeks ago, I switched out my 5 year old iPad 2 for the new iPad Pro and I LOVE IT! Remember, fanboys, not everyone needs the latest widget. It works; it’s fine. Until it start to give you problems like my old iPad, then you shop around. Cook is overseeing a mature market and while the sales growth is not stratosphere level, it is profitable. With ongoing uncertainty, Apple is doing well and meeting demands. Sometime, you twits need to leave the devices behind and go do something worthwhile. Maybe you will realize how insignificant you are with your damn dramas.
smartphones are great and there will always be iPhones but I think they’re just replacement devices; you use them until they stop working now not something you look forward to on a yearly basis. Of course, I have no problem with how other people spend their money.
Virtual reality or augmented reality on the other hand; if Apple come up with something great I would definitely look forward to.
By “turn around” do you mean make more than ever before?
wildly successsful airpods?
must have been reading the wrong reviews.
Yes…wildly successful and you are reading the wrong reviews because most people love their AirPods. Me included.
It isn’t enough to be insanely talented: you have to know what to do. That seems to be Apple’s problem for at least the last 2 years (which means 4 years due to product development cycles). I fear this problem will get worse once the majority of Apple isolates itself inside the doughnut-shaped Bubble of NIH [1]. What was needed was to bust a good chunk of Apple’s design and conceptual engineering staffs _out_ of Silicon Valley and into the messy real world. Not gonna happen apparently.
Perhaps Cook and Ivy should spend some time reading _How Buildings Learn_ as well as some of the detailed criticisms of Bauhaus that have been written over the last 60 years by people who have the misfortune to have to live with results of that school so loved by designers and hated by ordinary human beings.
[1] Not Invented Here
Finally, a critical debate as opposed to a blind meltdown peppered with the first-person pronoun. But when a reviewer mentions a ‘headphone jack’ in the current era, it brings to mind the 19th century switchboard in a telephone exchange. On the other hand, when he refers to the ubiquitous hole as a ‘digital audio output’ (which it is) he re-aligns his narrative with the audiophile’s Peachtree. Folks, for perspective some editing is in order:- “… controversial moves like switching exclusively to USB-C …” should be replaced with “… the logical move forward of switching to Thunderbolt 3 that runs at 40G speeds, drives 5K monitors and charges the unit…” and perhaps “…. ditching the iPhone’s headphone jack…” could be switched to “… setting aside the digital audio output on the iPhone but retaining the DAO on the Pro for hard-core audiophiles…“
Using the USB-C form factor for all connections and protocols originating or terminating on the MBP is kind of a head scratcher. AFAIK there is no technical reason that USB and Thunderbolt had to be combined into a single phy which is then switched at the logic level depending on what it is plugged into. It is however kind of a typical form over function move, which has started to grate on Apple loyalists.
For instance I don’t really care how thin a laptop is. I really don’t care how thin an iMac is. But this seems to be all that Cook and Ive care about anymore. What can we toss out the window in order to make the computer thinner?
Oops I mean change the focus from features to form factor.
As far as the headphone jack. Do you think of your sneakers as dowdy things from the 1950’s?
Would you toss them out the window just because the basic concept originated sometime before you were born?
I suppose we should get rid of the keyboard input devices on all Macs. After all they originate with TYPEWRITERS, which predate the phono plug by almost 20 years! Is this a computer or a steam shovel?
Bring back Forstall. That ought’a shake things up…
Jeeeeesus! What a pant load. Every other company in the free world would LOVE to have a year like Apple had in 2016. They are making so much money. Yeah, really need to turn those fortunes around. Not. What a joke.
Apple seems to be disengaged from the actual usage of it’s computers. They design these great looking slabs of aluminum that happen to have computers inside them. Then after regular humans get to see them there are all kinds of shortfalls apparent. For instance, someone at Apple has a hate on for the Kensington Security slot. Which makes it kind of foolhardy to deploy multiple Mac Pros or Macbook Pros in volume in an educational or institutional environment.
Likewise for the filetting of Final Cut Pro a while back. Nobody I know uses Final Cut anymore. They have all jumped to Adobe and Avid. And you know what, if Final Cut was still a choice for serious pros, the trashcan Mac Pro would sell better! Final Cut takes better advantage of that hardware than Media Composer or Premiere.