In Apple’s iconic “1984” commercial, it wasn’t a stretch to realize that the big brother figure was meant to represent IBM. That makes it very ironic that IBM now has more Macs, iPads, and iPhones deployed than any company except Apple.
The extent to which Apple devices are being used at IBM became clear during a presentation at MacWorld|iWorld last week by Chris Peppin that detailed the initiatives of Big Blue related to Apple. Those initiatives are pretty shocking considering the fact that IBM was once Apple’s number one adversary in the business technology market.
Obviously things have changed over nearly three decades. IBM not longer directly competes in the desktop computing space, having long ago sold its PC business to Lenovo. The company now focuses on software, business processes, and outsourcing core technology needs like enterprise help desks and custom software development.
More importantly, IBM has become one of the biggest supporters of employee choice and BYOD (bring your own device). The company not only allows employees to choose Apple solutions, their programs extent to explicitly creating iPhone and iPad versions of employees systems including messaging and unified communications as well as wikis and other collaborative tools. Some of these are solutions that IBM offers as products to outside companies and clients, but others are internal-only solutions.
This makes IBM a case study in meeting the demands of the consumerization of IT, a topic that I’ll be taking an in-depth look at over the coming weeks and months. Beyond that, it shows that the world’s largest companies can successfully integrate Apple OSes and devices.
Perhaps most importantly, IBM isn’t alone in this egalitarian perspective. It may be the biggest concentration of Apple tech in the workplace but it’s joined by other high profile companies like Lowes, Korea Telecom, SAP, Genetech, and others.
That means that the important message for business leaders and CIOs today is this: if Big Blue and other enterprises can make a success story with Apple’s iOS devices and Macs, why can’t we?
22 responses to “If IBM Can Win With Macs And iPads In Business, Why Can’t You?”
Was angry-hammer-throwing-chick wearing an iPod in the real commercial?
sry just realised what you meant. No. the commercial was made in 1984, and is called 1984. Before anyone could have even dreamed of the technology inside of that ipod
To be clear, IBM never hated Apple, Apple hated IBM. IBM hates Microsoft. The enemy of my enemy is my friend.
I would speculate another interesting stat is that IBM has more PC’s with Windows deployed than any other company too…to the tune of probably 10x more Windows PC’s than Microsoft.
Originally, no. In the rebroadcast version for the 20th anniversary, yes.
IBM hated Microsoft so much in 1984 that one year later they penned the agreement to make OS/2 together?
That was a remake of the original ad with the iPod CG’d in. I thought it was nicely done when I first saw it. Just don’t confuse it with the original. Apple is prescient, but not THAT prescient.
Not tyring to start a war but I would think that Apple is now the big brother. I mean as far as controlling everything. I am not trying to hate because I also own tons of mac stuff but I kinda feel what Apple once hated, they became.
I noticed Apple showed the iPod before 2001! If you look closely you will see the original iPod
I am a IBMer running a mac on my desk in fact our whole team run macs.. our internal intranet has a site dedicate to Mac called Mac@IBM. Notes, Sametime, and most other IBM business apps run on Mac.. I see more sales guys that ever running around with Air’s or Ipads as their main tools of business.. Only IBMs large Lenovo share portfolio stops the greater adoption of mac..
Yes. That is the reason. MS slowed OS/2 dev while at the same time working full speed on what became NT. IBM PC+OS/2 would have given IBM what Apple has today: control over the hardware and software. Instead we ended up being stuck with 10 years of crappy Microsoft software, full of security problems, on crappy dirt cheap, aesthetic-free PCs.
I thought the same thing! Turns out it was just a remake:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v…
you can see her nip :]
You have to read this incredibly bullshitty revisionist history, told by one of the guys at Chiat/Day, re the 1984 commercial, about how Steve didn’t know that they weren’t really making a commercial contra IBM; that instead it was about technology itself. Along the way the writer reinvents history–claiming that, by 1983, fax machines had brought down several totalitarian governments peacefully. Ha!
http://www.adweek.com/news/adv…
Sorry, forgot link:
http://www.adweek.com/news/adv…
Sorry, forgot link (and now I’m supposedly being moderated):
http://www.adweek.com/news/adv…
I never noticed the iPod,I was distracted …
I hate to ask a dumb question and I know it’s been asked BILLIONS of times… WHO is the woman in the ad ??
This commercial was made a year before the OS/2 agreement.
That’s Pink.
Then we must rebel and put up alternatives… how about Kiwi computers?
VERY COOL…. THX…W.
[ Begging for Life] Complaint about IBM China CSR on Centennial
IBM China is using its influence (including through money) to suppress or block medias, even legal systems on this land which I can prove. Tortured by the PTSD and relapsed depression they made on me during five years, really don’t know how to survive. thanks
Please Google:
IBM detained mother of ex-employee on the day of centennial
or
How Much IBM Can Get Away with is the Responsibility of the Media
or
Tragedy of Labor Rights Repression in IBM China
or
IBM Advised to Treat its People with Humanism in China