Mobile menu toggle

Does DRM Really Suck the Life of Batteries? — CNet Test Flawed

By

cult_logo_featured_image_missing_default1920x1080

An experiment by CNet to see whether copy-protected music files sucked the life out of player’s batteries is interesting but flawed.

According to CNet, DRM copy-protected music can decrease battery life by up to 25 percent thanks to the processing overhead necessary to play them.

But as one commentator on the story points out, the test compared protected WMA files with unprotected MP3 files. It should have compared protected-WMA to unprotected WMA, or Apple’s FairPlay AAC versus unprotected AAC.

  • Subscribe to the Newsletter

    Our daily roundup of Apple news, reviews and how-tos. Plus the best Apple tweets, fun polls and inspiring Steve Jobs bons mots. Our readers say: "Love what you do" -- Christi Cardenas. "Absolutely love the content!" -- Harshita Arora. "Genuinely one of the highlights of my inbox" -- Lee Barnett.

4 responses to “Does DRM Really Suck the Life of Batteries? — CNet Test Flawed”

  1. jeremy says:

    good eye, i didn’t even think of that the first time i read it. have they sent you any response to this.

  2. Captain N says:

    Not only should they be testing the same core file format, but they should (in theory) be testing the same music encoded at the same bitrate.