Mobile menu toggle

Google Pixel first impressions: Solid build, fugly back

By

Google Pixel
It's in talks to buy HTC, maker of the Pixel lineup.
Photo: Google

Google’s new Pixel and Pixel XL smartphones are ready to do battle with the iPhone 7 and iPhone 7 Plus and based on the first hands-on reviews, Apple could learn a few things from the new devices.

Apple’s shadow loomed large during today’s Google event. Exec from the search engine giant threw plenty of shade at the iPhone-maker for its lack of a headphone jack and storage limitations. Even though Google’s new devices look like total iPhone ripoffs the initial reaction has been mostly positive.

We’ll have to test Pixel in the wild before making our final judgement but here are some of the first reactions to the device from people that got to play with it:


[contextly_auto_sidebar]

Design

“The phone is solidly built. I loved the way the five-inch Pixel felt, size-wise. The Pixel XL was a bit more of a stretch, but considering it has a bigger battery and it’ll work better in the Daydream VR viewer, I might still lean toward that one. Both phones have big blank spaces at the top and bottom of their screens, which really seems like wasted space.” — PopSci

Unique back

“The Pixel XL stands out from the smartphone crowd thanks to its cool and unusual half-and-half glass and metal construction. Up top you get a glossy surfacing which thankfully seems quite resistant to grease and scuff marks. While on the bottom half, the XL is pure metal. It’s a very cool look, and a welcome antidote to non-stop all-metal mobiles.” — Recombu

Beautiful displays

“Displays on the Pixel (1080p) and the Pixel XL (Quad HD) both look great, with deep blacks thanks to the use of AMOLED screens, and both benefit from the new Pixel Launcher, which makes the software navigation buttons present in Android smaller, and which also has smaller, rounder icons throughout and a new Google launcher that also takes up less space. The end result of all these changes is a focus on just how much real estate the screen has to offer, which works well with rich images used as backdrops.” TechCrunch

So Smart

“Google Assistant doesn’t bug you with repeated requests like Siri does, and so the software’s ability to understand context in questions is at once a minor improvement, and a tremendous sea change. If you’re regularly using Siri or Google Now (the precursor to Google Assistant), then you will be pleased. Even if you don’t spend all your time furiously shouting out every request at your phone, Google Assistant is neat.” — Gizmodo

Tons of power

“Everything feels nice and fluid too, though that’s to be expected from pair of smartphones with quad-core Snapdragon 821 chipsets and 4GB of RAM. All told, the Pixels have more than enough horsepower to keep even the pickiest phone buffs pleased.” — Engadget

Overhyped camera

While my first play the sensor on the back of the Pixel XL is mostly positive, I don’t think it quite has the chops to be the best… Focusing does seem super fast though, and there’s no lag when you’re shooting in HDR. I shot a few photos in the demo area and they seemed perfectly fine, but they didn’t instantly make me say ‘wow’ like the Galaxy S7 did. The Google camera app is a bit limited too, with a lack of any manual controls — TrustedReviews

For VR, go XL

“Those who pick up the larger, higher resolution Pixel XL will get a better Daydream experience, simply because the display can pack more pixels into each of your eyes for a more immersive view. It’s not a deal breaker, and it won’t result in a terrible experience if you do opt for a Pixel – but there is a difference between the two phones.” — TechRadar

Nitpicking

“There’s only one speaker — at the bottom. Especially for a device that’s designed for Daydream VR, I expected stereo. It’s also inexplicable that there are antenna lines in the aluminum back, one on the bottom and another at the top. With such a large, glass “shade” on the back, it’s weird that they’re necessary at all.” — The Verge

  • Subscribe to the Newsletter

    Our daily roundup of Apple news, reviews and how-tos. Plus the best Apple tweets, fun polls and inspiring Steve Jobs bons mots. Our readers say: "Love what you do" -- Christi Cardenas. "Absolutely love the content!" -- Harshita Arora. "Genuinely one of the highlights of my inbox" -- Lee Barnett.

14 responses to “Google Pixel first impressions: Solid build, fugly back”

  1. leart says:

    looks okay to play Pokemon

    • frances.hosking says:

      I usually benefit in the span of 6-8 thousand dollars every month from working on the internet at home. If you are eager to work basic online tasks for 2h-5h /day from ease of your home and gain solid salary while doing it… Test this work FAVE.CO/2bocRGL

  2. Rick Ludwig says:

    Wow… this doesn’t just “look like an iPhone” – this is Google CLEARLY saying “Yep. We copied your design. We’re too big for you to sue. We dare you to try.”

    • macguy59 says:

      Maybe on the front but it looks nothing like an iPhone on the back. I do wonder though why there are antennae lines when the top half of the back in glass.

      • Richard Ludwig says:

        Nothing Like? The ONLY differences are slight: the duel metal/glass (seen before on the iPhone, but, granted, not the current one), the Home Button is on the back (their Touch ID home button is on the back instead of the front), and it has a G instead of the Apple Logo.

      • WiscoNative says:

        It runs Android. It has no physical home button, but on-screen buttons. It has a headphone port.

        I’ll admit that the industrial design is very similar to the iPhone’s, but it’s not a completely copy.

      • macguy59 says:

        But other than that they are identical ! Uh huh . . .

      • Richard Ludwig says:

        The point being, WHY are they so closely copying Apple’s design? This isn’t a case of “rounded edges” – other manufactures have CLEARLY shown they can make an attractive phone without making it look exactly like an iPhone – so why do it?

        I would bet if you held this phone up to somebody who hadn’t heard of the Pixel, and asked them to identify the phone, they would identify it as an iPhone (or, at least, a cheap knockoff).

  3. LukeB33 says:

    Wow. Completely rip off Apple’s commercial style (from their signature dancing close ups on white screens to the don’t blink video to even using a song from the same obscure Lemaitre band as the 5c prom) Then they insult them in said video… Bold. Bold move.

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/3103ca8e162ca791d8deae9ae359eba08196fe859e21a567a9d3bd32dfa7066d.jpg

  4. DarkxPunk says:

    Am I the only one that shrugs this off and would rather buy a galaxy over this? I mean I won’t, I am an apple guy. But what’s the appeal of this junk?

    • WiscoNative says:

      Some people prefer a phone that runs pure Android, and Google’s Pixel (and formerly Nexus) lines are about the only way to get that.

      • DarkxPunk says:

        Anyone who is a regular consumer probably does not even know the difference between Samsungs skinned android and stock android. The only people that would care are tech people and tech people can simply root their devices so that isn’t that big of a perk or care to them. Regardless Samsung Galaxy as a phone still seems like a better option…

      • WiscoNative says:

        I use an S7 myself, because eI prefer the hardware design, so I understand your points.

  5. SomeGuy says:

    I think…. I’ll just stick to a real iPhone. Thanks tho.

Leave a Reply