In the latest controversy over Apple’s stringent App Store guidelines, the company has rejected an “educational app” about the August 2014 shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri.
The reason? Apple objects to “the subject matter” of the game, which deals with the impact of the real-life shooting that sparked rioting and a continuing conversation about race and police brutality.
“I was told, the app ‘refers to a very specific event’ and suffered from ‘too narrow scope,'” developer Dan Archer wrote in a blog post on Medium. “[The App Store representative] continued, ‘something targeted at a specific event is not appropriate.’ Instead, I was recommended to ‘develop an app around a topic — a new topic,’ she took pains to suggest — to make an app that would be ‘topical in general terms.'”
Game website Kotaku is seizing on this as an example of Apple’s “shitty policy” for accepting or rejecting apps.
Apple’s policy for apps is as follows:
“We view Apps different than books or songs, which we do not curate. If you want to criticize a religion, write a book. If you want to describe sex, write a book or a song, or create a medical App. It can get complicated, but we have decided to not allow certain kinds of content in the App Store.”
Personally, I feel for Apple in cases like this. Regardless of where you sit politically, Apple’s in a tough situation when it comes to deciding which apps to allow or disallow. It’s an inevitability for any app store that includes a vetting process. It’s also an example of “Apple’s house, Apple’s rules” — which developers can choose to follow or not.
Although we won’t get to see Ferguson Firsthand on our iPhones, a previously released Oculus Rift version gives some indication of what the game was like:
Luke Dormehl is a U.K.-based journalist and author, with a background working in documentary film for Channel 4 and the BBC. He is the author of The Apple Revolution and The Formula: How Algorithms Solve All Our Problems … and Create More, both published by Penguin/Random House. His tech writing has also appeared in Wired, Fast Company, Techmeme and other publications.
4 responses to “Apple rejects controversial Ferguson Firsthand app”
what Jack answered I’m shocked that individuals ready to get paid $20684 in four weeks on the web…………Afterearning an average of 19952 Dollars monthly,I’m finally getting 97 Dollars an hour,just working 4-5 hours daily online.….. Weekly paycheck… Bonus opportunities…earn upto $16k to $19k /a month…Only a few hour required to understand and start working…….HERE I STARTED…look over here …nr…
➤➤➤➤ www.WorkPost30.Com
I don’t see how anyone could argue against Apple in this case. It takes a real scumbag company to stir the pot while profiting off of the events in Ferguson.
I guess the argument would be about Apple not using its platform to promote social justice, or a more general accusation of censorship. I agree with you that it’s hard to see how you could argue against Apple, though. I think the criticisms I brought up don’t carry much weight.
it makes me sick to know that someone actually had the idea to make an app about this horrible event
im not saying this game shouldn’t be allowed on some darker websites where teenagers post stories about how they killed the neighbors cat yesterday, but not on the App Store
normal people go on there to you know