We know Apple will launch its iPhone 6s and 6s Plus this fall — you can bet your house on it — but what we don’t know is whether it will be accompanied by an iPhone 6c. For months it looked like the smaller, more affordable model was set to return, however, a recent report said Apple has scrapped that plan.
But does Apple really need an iPhone 6c?
The Cupertino company makes billions every quarter off its flagship models, and it has already stated it has no interest in building “cheap” devices to grab market share in emerging markets. But what about those who want a flagship iPhone that’s small enough to use with one hand?
Join us in this week’s Friday Night Fight as we take it to a debate!
Killian Bell, Writer (Cult of Android): Recent reports have suggested Apple has given up on the idea of a 4-inch iPhone 6c, which, given the success of the iPhone 5c, I think is probably for the best.
While I think it’s a neat idea, I don’t think Apple would make the device affordable enough to appeal to consumers who want tiny smartphones, and I think a 4-inch screen is just too small for the vast majority. After all, that’s why iPhone sales were falling before the 6 and 6 Plus came along.
Do you think Apple needs an iPhone 6c?
Luke Dormehl, Writer (Cult of Mac): You’ll be surprised to hear that I completely disagree with you, Killian — which is probably just as well for a story called Friday Night Fights.
When we first heard rumors about a smaller 4-inch iPhone 6s back in late 2014, I pretty much dismissed them as you are now. But I’ve had so many emails from people since then saying that they prefer the smaller iPhone form factor for a variety of reasons. I think small, medium and large make a lot of sense as ‘categories’ for the iPhone. I love my iPhone 6 Plus, but for all its good points, Steve Jobs was right: the 4-inch iPhone fits perfectly in your hand.
Do I think Apple should return to only producing smaller iPhones? No. However giving people the choice can only be a positive thing. As for iPhone sales falling before the 6 and 6 Plus came along? You may need to check your figures, because the iPhone has grown year-on-year since it was introduced.

Photo: iPhonesoft
KB: I’m sure Tim Cook gets a lot of emails calling for a 4-inch iPhone, too — but I bet there are also lots of people out there wishing for an updated Apple Pippin and a new QuickTake camera. That doesn’t mean Apple should make them.
The issue I have with a 4-inch device is that it’s not that much smaller than a 4.7-inch device really. Most people could get used to the extra 0.7 inches if they just gave it a shot for a few days.
The other problem is, no one wants a 4-inch iPhone made of plastic with old components. It would need to look just like the iPhone 6 or iPhone 6s, and carry much of the same internals — but then it’s not going to be much more affordable, and that defeats the purpose.
Apple would be better off keeping the iPhone 5s around — which has a 64-bit processor and Touch ID — and perhaps just adding NFC for Apple Pay.
The pros of a 4.7-inch device far outweigh the cons. A bigger screen is better for pretty much everything, and battery life is better. Apple knows that know — and it wants consumers to understand that — which is probably why it has reportedly scrapped plans for an iPhone 6c. Bringing it back would be a little like putting a CD drive back in the MacBook just because some people don’t like flash drives.
With regards to the sales stat, I actually mean market share was falling — not sales. Android was gaining a larger lead faster than ever before prior to the launch of larger iPhones.
LD: And that market share race to the bottom is working out so well for Android manufacturers, isn’t it?
When it comes to a smaller iPhone 6s, however, I think you’re missing a few things. For one, Apple would pretty much have the 4-inch market to itself. As everyone has rushed to hop on the phablet bandwagon, it’s hard to find a serious smartphone maker manufacturing anything smaller than 4.7-inches. Even the so-called Sony Xperia Z3 Compact is 4.6-inches.
Apple has the chance to snap up a lot of customers who don’t want a massive smartphone. You got close to the real advantage when you mentioned Apple Pay, though. I’m loving Apple Pay right now, and it’s something you can currently only do with a larger iPhone — or a Watch connected to an iPhone. As Apple pushes mobile payments, it makes sense to have as many iPhones as possible offering Apple Pay.
That alone is a great selling point for the 6c, rather than continuing to trot out the 5s. It’s especially important as Apple continues its march into China and, after that, India. These places are where Apple can grow its revenue. And there are lots of mid-level consumers who would love a more budget iPhone, which is what the 6c could be.
Finally, as the guy responsible for many of Cult of Mac’s great puns, I’m sad we’ll otherwise never get an intro advert for the phone with the tagline “I’m 6c and I know it!”

Photo: Apple
KB: Well, that’s not true at all. There are lots of Android devices with small screens, like the Samsung Galaxy Ace 4, which has a 4.3-inch display. The difference between these and the iPhone is that they’re ridiculously affordable, and that’s what I think people who want small smartphones are looking for.
I certainly agree that Apple could do even better in China and emerging markets like India with a truly affordable iPhone. It would be great to see it tackling the likes of Xiaomi head-on with an iPhone that costs just a few hundred dollars off-contact. But Apple will never release one.
Phil Schiller has previously said Apple won’t release a “cheap” device just to grab market share or extra sales — and the iPhone 6c wouldn’t be that; like the iPhone 5c was the the iPhone 5s, it would be a slightly cheaper alternative with a cheaper design and aging specifications. And no Apple fan wants that.
I think Apple is happy with the model it has now; a refresh every year, with last year’s model becoming more affordable. After it, it’s making plenty of cash this way.
LD:
Some flop, huh?
At the end of the day, this is something Apple will decide — and, before that, readers can weigh in on who wins this particular debate. But you’ve not really offered me any reasons that aren’t “Well, Apple’s doing fine with its current approach. Why rock the boat?” And that’s just not the right way to approach this.
Oh, and admit that “6c and I know it” pun is worth building the phone on that basis alone, won’t you?

Photo: Apple
KB: The iPhone 5c may have outsold the Galaxy S5 in the first month, but I’m sure it didn’t continue to outsell Samsung’s most successful smartphone to date.
There is one thing I do agree with you on: Apple will decide whether an iPhone 6c is worth it. If we see one this year, the company obviously sees a need for it — but if we don’t, I think that’s Apple’s way of telling us that we need to move on from 4-inch phones.
Friday Night Fights is a series of weekly death matches between two no-mercy brawlers who will fight to the death — or at least agree to disagree — about which is better: Apple or Google, iOS or Android?
17 responses to “Does Apple really need a 4-inch iPhone 6c?”
Replacement parts for the 5S have gone up in price so guessing they are at least talking about a smaller phone.
I really hope there is another 4-inch iPhone. As great as the iPhone 6 is, the screen is just a bit too large to use one-handed. And for someone like me that suffers from focal hyperhidrosis, where my hands will occasionally sweat for no reason, the design and size of the iPhone 6 is TERRIBLE. There is no way to get a proper grip on the device to be able to use it with one hand without risking it slipping out and falling.
For Apple to abandon the 4-inch iPhone would be to alienate users who fell in love with iPhone before the iPhone 6 existed. They wouldn’t want to do that.
Personally I’m going to keep my iPhone 5s as long as possible. The 6 and 6+ are just too large. I did test drive a 6 for two weeks and it just wasn’t right so I went back to my 5s. I’m not sure a 6c is the answer either, I just don’t like plastic. I believe they should keep the 5s form factor, which is fantastic, and upgrade the internals. I know their are many out there that just don’t want a phablet, they just want a phone you can use with one hand that fits your hand and your pocket.
“The difference between these and the iPhone is that they’re ridiculously affordable, and that’s what I think people who want small smartphones are looking for.”
Not me.
“like the iPhone 5c was the the iPhone 5s, it would be a slightly cheaper alternative with a cheaper design and aging specifications. And no Apple fan wants that.”
I do!
While I would love it if Apple released a 4-inch iPhone that was made from the same specs and parts as the latest and greatest iPhone (in fact, I’d even pay the same price as I would as the bigger 4.7-inch for a 4-inch phone) I would gladly settle for being a year behind cycle if it meant I could keep the 4-inch form factor.
There is no debate at all if Apple will be selling a 4-inch version of the iPhone, they will. Too many people want the smaller version and have not upgraded to either version of the iPhone 6 because of the size, especially women with smaller hands. Ask anyone that still owns one and ask them why they did not upgrade. That is exactly what they will say.
Plus it will take little or no extra tech to do it. It may not be a plastic “C”, but an upgraded version of the iPhone 5c and 5s is coming.
Go to the Apple Store right now. They are selling TWO 4″ iPhone now. They are not going to get rid of half of their product line… be reasonable.
Why do you idiots have an Android writer talking about an iPhone. Perhaps you could bring in an elevator inspector or a zoologist to pipe in as well.
While I’m sure people like me are not exactly the overwhelming majority, whether they roll out a 4-inch phone will determine if Apple gets money from me or not. Simply put, if they release a 4-inch phone in the same or similar form factor to a 5/5s, I will buy it; if not, I will either hold onto my 5 until it breaks or buy the smallest Android I can find. Obviously, I would prefer a metal case and as up-to-date internals as possible with iOS, but I refuse to spend money on a phablet. Having the latest technology is fun and everything, but if I have to stay a year or two behind in order to get a phone that I can and will use, then that’s what I’ll do.
Apple does not ‘need’ a 4 inch 6c or 4 inch 6s.
But I think it would sell a hell of a lot if it did.
Personally, I would prefer a 4 inch iphone, I don’t like to carry round a large phone, and I have an ipad for larger touchscreen stuff.
And I would also prefer it to be similar to the larger versions, not with some tacky coloured cover.
But I’m not making any assumptions about how many people would also want a smaller phone, I don’t know if we’re a small minority or not, and I totally get people wanting a larger phone, and I also would get it if people wanted the cheaper ‘c’ version.
Im looking to get a new phone at some point in the not too distant future, and if I were to get an iphone, and no smaller 6s is released, I would prefer a 5s.
I have the 6+, and I do like the phone. But I feel that a 5.5″ screen is a bit too big for a phone. Don’t get me wrong, the extra screen size is good for some things like photo editing, playing some games and web browsing, but it’s the size of the device is the issue. Trying to respond to a text when I’m out shopping and I only have one hand free. It’s impossible to operate it with one hand. Even if I put the phone in landscape more makes it even more difficult. But I guess we now know why the apple watch is now here, which I have zero interest in. So come the refresh in September I will be passing on the 5.5″ and hope there is a 4″ one. If not I’ll just go to the 4.7″ one and get an iPad for my mobile computing needs.
I have a friend who works at Apple in London Ontario Canada. She said that people who say the iPhone 5c was a flop have no idea what their talking about. She said, “they are so wrong”. She wouldn’t tell me sales figures but just repeated, “they are so wrong”. I asked her about the iPhone 5c 8GB and she said sales dropped at first but have picked back up. It’s far from a sellout, she said but then added once again, “they are so wrong”.
I wood say that there really aren’t many android phones at sub-4.7 screens without sacrificing specs, leading to the majority of them being entry Orr medium-spec’d phones. The Z1 Compact is oe of the few with a 4.3″ screen a m decent specs and build, but that’s already surpassed by new phones with 8 cores and 3-4 gb of ram ,
I had a 4S, and while it was small I liked how pocketable, portable, and easy it was to use with one hand and your thumb. i’d consider a 4″ iPhone if a new one came out.
Apple will just keep 5s as the lowest tier and sell loads of them.
If Apple could price the 6c at $300, it would be a good upgrade from the iPod Touch (at $200) when it’s time for parents to upgrade their kids to a phone. (Seems every suburban kid I run into has a Touch these days).
4 inches is a good size for a premium smart phone. There is no great reason not to go with a small, medium, and large approach. I really hope Apple does this. While I’m fine with the 6+, my mom doesn’t want anything lager than her 5S. Remember when you had to pay a significant premium for a smaller device? Hell, Apple could make the 6s the starting price, charge a little more for the 4″, and top out the range with a 6s+. No plastic mind you, they would all need high end features…
I would buy a smaller iPhone 6 but not if it is substantially weaker in perfomance (which will be the case I guess). I have no problem affording the biggest one, I just don’t need and like such big phones.
I’m too 6c for my shirt …
If Apple sold an iPhone 6c in matte black plastic I’d buy one in a heartbeat.