Apple iPad: the Most Important Product of the Decade

Apple iPad: the Most Important Product of the Decade

Incredible technology products have emerged in the last 10 years, from Web 2.0 sites to Twitter, GPS-enabled smart phones to cheap pocket video recorders.

On New Year’s Day, 2001, blogs were still largely unknown to the public. RIM had yet to launch the BlackBerry, and Palm hadn’t yet announced its Treo. Blu-Ray was still several years in the future. Google hadn’t even started working on Gmail. A 3.1 megapixel camera cost $700. Almost nobody had heard of social networking.

There’s no question that technology has completely changed our world in the past ten years. But if I had to pick one product that was more impactful and more culture-changing – in other words, the most important technology product of the decade, it would have to be the Apple iPad.

The measure of importance has got to be the degree to which a product has changed culture, and also the degree to which it has influenced other products. And by both those measures the iPad wins hands-down.

The only product that comes even close would be MySpace. It was MySpace that popularized the essential ingredients for social networking, ingredients that Facebook used to truly change the way people live and interact.

But the iPad is the most impactful product of the decade not for what it has already changed, but what it will change in the decade to come.

The full impact of this change will first be felt in less than a week. When CES 2011 begins on Jan. 6, it will become clear how much the iPad is influencing the direction of computing. An overwhelming tsunami of me-too touch tablets will wash across the industry. There will be cool ones and lame ones, cheap ones and expensive ones. But all of them will be influenced by the design of the iPad. Most of them will exist only because the iPad exists.

It is inevitable that iPad-like touch tablets will one day shed their cell phone operating systems, and acquire full fledged desktop operating systems. Applications developers, and especially games developers, will optimize their interface design for multi-touch. The mouse will be dead before the coming decade is over.

The iPad represents nothing less than the first real 3rd-generation personal computer.

The first generation devices, such as the Apple II and the DOS PCs, sported command line interfaces. You memorized words, then typed them in at a “prompt.” Initially, the output was almost always a screen full of text.

The 2nd-generation devices have WIMP user interfaces – windows, icons, menus and pointing devices. The history of these graphical computers stretches from the Xerox Star, Apple Lisa and Apple Macintosh 128k right on up to the PC you’re using today. Even Microsoft Windows based Tablet PCs — though tablets and mouseless – are WIMP computers running WIMP applications, but with a tablet interface layer.

We have been using 2nd-generation WIMP computers for 30 years now.

The first of the 3rd-generation computers emerged in 1997 with the Microsoft Surface device, the Apple iPhone and other phones with MPG user interfaces (multi-touch, physics and gestures).

These early MPG devices were important, but they were not general-purpose computers. The Surface is a proprietary and vertical device used primarily for marketing. The iPhone is, well, a phone.

The iPad, on the other hand, is the computer that changes everything. The iPad’s user interface, App Store model, and above all usefulness as an all-purpose MPG computer for the masses truly changes everything. In just a few years most of the computers that most people buy will work pretty much like the iPad. They’ll just be bigger and more powerful.

And MPG computing makes enormous sense, because it’s far more “human compatible” than WIMP computing. The use of a mouse over here to control a pointer on a screen over there is an abstraction. There’s a clunky piece of physical mechanics serving as an intermediary between you and the stuff you want to manipulate. MPG computers like the iPad, on the other hand, enable direct touch. It’s so basic and intuitive that a baby can do it.

The iOS ecosystem in general, and the iPad in particular, has sent the industry scrambling to copy. Suddenly, everyone’s got to have a multi-touch user interface. Everyone has to have an App Store. Everything’s gotta be a tablet.

Even if you never buy an iPad, your world will be deeply influenced by it. ATM screens will become multi-touch. Windows and Linux PCs will be sold as giant touch tablets. More software will be purchased in an “app store” model. Clamshell laptops will gradually become yesterday’s news.

The iPad also represents a rare case where the first culture-changing system is also the one that dominates the market. The Xerox Star was the first GUI PC, but failed in the market. MySpace pretty much invented the modern social network but is being clobbered by Facebook. Palm pioneered the smart phone but is now at an also-ran in the market. Usually, the copycats win.

But that’s not the case with the iPad. The iPad was the world’s first general-purpose MPG computer and will continue to completely dominate the market. That almost never happens in technology.

Of course I could be wrong about all this. We just might never have a 3rd-generation PC movement. User interface design may be the only area of computing to never evolve. WIMP computers might be with us forever. The mouse may linger on far beyond obsolescence like the fax machine continues to do.

But I don’t think so. I think the revolution is here. I think the iPad is changing the way we interact with machines, and will influence thousands of other products.

And for that reason I believe the Apple iPad is the most important product the decade.

DON'T MISS
How Will Apple Bring iOS to the Desktop?

Apps you might like

  • Seth

    iPhone begat iPad. It was much more important.

    • cv

      Lineage is important, however it’s not the only thing. Leopold Mozart was a composer/conductor who gave birth to another composer/conductor, Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart.

      Does that make Leopold necessarily more important that Wolfgang? History does not think so.

      And if you are right, why are you typing in English? Why aren’t you just inscribing cuneiform letters into stone tablets?

  • Travis

    I agree with Seth. iPhone was the most important product of the decade. It changed EVERYTHING and the iPad/tablet PCs to come/app store model is the continuation of the “iPhone Revolution”.

    • Donatron

      But according to Steve Jobs the iPad idea was born first. Once he saw the touch interface in action they held off on the iPad to work on iPhone. So without the initial iPad idea, no iPhone.

      • oakie

        a product must be produced. the iPad didnt become a product until 2010, therefore ANY “chicken or egg” argument is meaningless no matter which side you argue on. that said, i would have to say the writer of this blog post is a complete moron based on his own qualifications for this proclamation:

        “The measure of importance has got to be the degree to which a product has changed culture, and also the degree to which it has influenced other products. And by both those measures the iPad wins hands-down”

        the iPad has not in any way yet changed culture. it simply follows in the footsteps of two prior products: iPhone and iPod Touch as far as cultural influence. why? because the hardware arguably has no effect on its own, so it must be the software… but he software has been out for years before iPad.

        as for “influencing other products,” it hasnt. it is the result of failed products before it, also known as tablet computers. the iPad is the result of the tablet form factor being improved by using mobile software instead of desktop software for a smoother, more seamless experience when navigating it’s software features due to it’s touch-based design. the iPhone, by far, has this aspect covered… the iPhone very clearly changed the way phones were designed and controlled since it’s introduction. mobile phones havent been the same since. the iPad is a derivative of a previously nascent form factor and hasnt influenced anything yet.

        so, by both of your measures, the iPad fails miserably. but i take back the “moron” comment since it’s NYE and will assume you were somewhere over 0.08% BAC when you wrote this blog post.

  • Adam

    I can see what your saying about the iPhone and I agree that if it were not for the iPhone the iPad would not exist, but the difference between the two in my opinion is that the iphone is a ‘luxury’ phone for the want of a better word, it is a brilliant device but not every one would consider spending that much on a fancy phone. The iPad on the other hand is a viable alternative to a laptop at roughly the same price if not cheaper in most cases.

  • http://elgan.com Mike Elgan

    My belief is that the larger plan was always multi-touch computers of all sizes, and that the iPhone was simply the first that could be implemented.

    • David stevenson

      technically I think you are wrong–I am sure that apple had 7-12″ tablets running beta ios and apps in 2005 or earlier. it was the component price and business model that dictated a phone before the tablet. a smart business decision based on a billion device existing market vs a who knows what tablet market?

  • HD Boy

    I have to disagree too — the iPhone is the product of the decade that changed everything — not the iPad. In spite of the fact that iPad development was initiated first (according to Steve Jobs himself), without the foundations laid by the commercial success of the iPhone (and even the iPod), the iPad would not exist.

  • Mark

    Steve jobs and apple made the iPad first, years before the iPhone, (check his statements). Realising it was way ahead of it’s time. Steve jobs brilliantly decided to realise most of the technology in a touch screen phone. And when the Market was ready release the iPad which they have perfected all those years. That’s way apple is so far ahead of everybody else. They’ve been working on this tech for the last decade! Apple and co have want for years for us to catch up with them. God if they’ve waited all this time what the heck have they got waiting for us next. Can’t wait lol

    • Chris

      The iBot… First truly functional and practical, all purpose humanoid robot for the home. To be released June 2015 for $1999.99.

      (I actually have no idea. But a person I know who works at Apple has been saying that 2015 will be a revolutionary year for Apple, moreso than anything that has come so far.)

  • http://icrizzo.com Mr.Christopher

    I agree with Mike. Everyone has cell phones and has had them since the 80′s. Only thing the iPhone did was change how people used phones. The iPad brought tablet devices to the forefront, of course other tablets existed before the iPad, but they were not really meant for the main stream. The iPad changed the game for tablets, now every “me-to” company on the market has a tablet coming to the table, most of them running old versions of Android!

  • Paul

    No one took Tablets seriously nor gave them much thought until the iPad was announced. Now everyone and their mother is coming out with a Tablet. I’m chuckling at all of the naysayers who asked who would ever have a need for a Tablet and that no one would buy them.

  • Jeff

    The iPad is a very very cool device, but I’d say the iPhone was more important. The iPhone changed what people thought about smart phones and how we interacted with the web on the go. The iPad magnified that and probably is the most important product of the next 5-10 years (I’m sure I’m wrong about that part, but I can’t wait to see what technology brings.)

  • Ryan Squires

    Frankly, I disagree with the premise of this article. The iPad MIGHT be an important influence on the next decade but it simply cannot be the most important product of the last 10 years, it simply hasn’t been out long enough to make a difference on them. The iPad was released in the last 4% of the decade, it simply can’t have had enough impact yet.

    The iMac has had a much larger impact on the mac market, and the computer market in general over the last 10 years than the iPad has. The iPhone has been HUGE for Apple and the cellular phone industry. Speaking of cell phones, why are THEY not the product of the decade? In 2001 I knew 4 people with a cell phone. Now everyone has one, and most of those people no longer have phones in their homes.

    The last decade was the decade of mobile telephones, the next I predict will be the decade of mobile everything.

  • jdog

    Wasn’t the first smartphone made within the last decade, I say it should be Smartphones in general. Phones are probably the only thing that we have surpassed when it comes to what people thought they would look like 40 years ago, we are still waiting on flying cars. You can’t have an iPhone or iPad without someone making the first smartphone.

  • Troy

    Why not the iPod? Everything was pattern from the iPod, like the iPod Touch –> iPhone, then eventually the iPad. It changes the whole music industry as well, going from CD to digital music.

  • Ethan

    Who cares about smartphones and tablets? Not one of those things is going to make you healthier, more productive or better organized. Anyone who claims they will is only making an excuse for a personal addiction.

    The most important personal or home use technology innovation of the past decade is Sharp’s plasmacluster.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=shM34qnQxYA

  • King

    iphone was the real game changer
    iphone was the different thing
    iPad is the evolution

    basically the iPad is an iPhone with a large screen
    I could be wrong, but even spec wise the iPhone is superior in RAM, hardware(cellphone,camera)

  • ApoorvJ

    I think you mean 2007 not 1997 in your article.

  • Morgan B

    I own both. Without a doubt, the iPhone is a much more important device than the iPad.

  • DonAbiola

    You guys are either too closed minded or just really f**king short sighted. the iPad the device of the decade? are you for real? what about the iPod? The evolution of everything an iDevice is made from, almost all other devices evolved from it. Almost everyone has one, and Its still very relevant to every age group, it can do almost everything the iPad can do.
    I really cant believe no one thought of the iPod, you are all bikering about the iPad, its barely 8 months old. gooosh!

  • Andy

    This is an interesting read, but I’m not convinced.

    I do agree with many of the other comments made that describe the iPad is a large form factor of the iPhone, and the iPhone therefore may deserve this accolade.

    But if we’re looking at the iPad as the evolution of the iPhone, as Troy as already pointed out let’s not forget the roots of both of these products, released in October 2001 – couldn’t the iPod be considered “Most Important Consumer Electronics Product of the Decade”? Think of the industry and culture changing impact the iPod made, leading the way in changing the music industry and how people consume music, and more recently the way people watch movies. And of course there are the products that Apple were then able to go on and create, including the iPad.

    A user interface alone is not enough to qualify a product for this title, but this article seems to be arguing otherwise, and suggests the way we interact with the iPad is enough reason for it to be considered as the product of the decade. I would have to hear a far more convincing argument on why the iPad should be considered for this title beyond its MPG interface.

    This statement I particularly like – “The mouse will be dead before the coming decade is over”. I love these sorts of predictions. If only I could remember to check back on this 10 years from now.

    And “Product of the decade”? What about products that have advanced medicine, space exploration, and so many other important areas? Seriously, let’s give this article a little perspective and re-titled it to, “Apple iPad: the Most Important Consumer Electronics Product of the Decade”.

  • Jake439

    I do not agree at all with the author of this article because the iPhone is way more revolutionary then the iPad. And iPhone 4 “changed everything…again” (go to the apple website and go to the iPhone section it says that!!!). Plus the iPad is just the offspring of the iPhone except for the phone part…

  • mlahero

    @DonAbiola

    I agree. It is amazing that the iPod isn’t recognised here as the game changer that brought Mac into the spotlight and subsequently led to the iPhone and iPad and therefore bringingi Apple back to life as well as changing every persons every day life. Everyone has an iPod, lets wait ten years and then look back at the iPad and praise it then.

    This “iPad is the most important” nonsense smacks of one of those terrible “Top 100 films ever” tv programs where the top 5 are conveniently the current box office blockbusters.

  • http://www.mattinglydesign.net Mattingly

    @Mike Elgan

    Whether the iPhone or iPad was the real game changer is something I would have to straddle the fence on by saying it was really a culmination of both.

    Earlier this years Steve Jobs revealed that the iPad’s development was what led to the iPhone. Having realized the market potential for an easy to use smart phone (realistically, the carriers opened the door by selling crap), they went after the latter. Which of course, redefined what a smart phone could be, and the also-rans followed suit.

    But it was the enormous success of the iPhone that made the iPad possible, not the other way around. Apple is the largest purchaser in the world of flash memory: by driving down the price of components like flash and capacitive touch screens, they were able to introduce the iPad at an appealing mass-market price of $500 and still retain a typically fat Apple profit (remember that pundits were largely predicting an entry price of $1000).

    Had the iPad been introduced before the iPhone/iPod Touch, it’s entirely reasonable to assume that it WOULD have been a $1000 device. And something that is half as functional as a laptop with the same price tag would have been seen as very cool, but certainly not a practical purchase (read G4 Cube).

    In any event, what I’m saying is that mass market appeal is an important part of the success of the product, and its resulting level of influence in the tech world… and Apple has been very keen on knowing when to move their pieces on the chess board in the past several years. How many Microsoft Surfaces have shipped?

  • Alex

    Pass the Kool Aid I’m not seeing it yet …. too me its still just an oversized iPod touch.

  • joel aniekwe

    the ipad is really a revolution especially for academic reason.it makes on to be able to enjoy reading .its really a magical product and an evolution ,just like holding a piece of glass which does what ever you want it to do .just think of any thing ,get the apps and order it to fulfil the task

  • Moe

    I would lean to the a iPhone since it completely eclipsed anything in its category space. I personally prefer my ipad to an iPhone, but I think it’s too early to judge the importance of the iPad just yet. I still feel limited every day by inability to use flash websites, unless I use pay VPN services.

    Now if they decide to introduce iPad 2 with more features at an even lower price, I think that’s the kind of thing that can ice off all competitors for decades.

  • Choozy

    Actually, not many people realize that the idea of an “App Store” was already sort of implemented in Linux as the Synaptic Package Manager does sort of the same thing.

    It has become way better ofcourse.

    I hope we’ll stick to our mouses and keyboards just a little bit longer because I don’t like the touch stuff very much. (Probably because of the Samsung B3410 wich had a worthless implementation of it.)

    Greetings, Choozy

  • Scoot

    The iPad is cool, but I think the most important product of the decade is the Snuggie.

  • @lsmiranda

    Agreed! great article!

    –Posted from my iPad

  • Dan F

    First, please know that “impactful” is not a word, yet its use spreads like a virus (you used it twice).

    While I agree that the iPad is an amazing, if not revolutionary device, I felt your article was merely fair, and fairly meatless. You make some interesting points, but your wishy-washy stance near the end (beginning with “Of course I could be wrong about all this …”) weakens your premise substantially. To suggest that “user interface design may be the only area of computing to never evolve” seems utterly absurd, especially given all your previous observations and assertions. Frankly, I don’t think you’re as convinced as you would have us all believe.

  • Richard

    I hate to be a party pooper, but isn’t it a bit early in the decade to be choosing the most important product? iPad was released 3 months into the current decade.

    If you look at the LAST decade, I’d have to say iPhone.

    Who knows what we’ll be talking about in 9 years . . .

  • Shane

    The iPad was released in 2010, the iPod and iPhone were released a different decade.

  • Guestemail

    Great read… until the last sentence of course. You botched it at the end.

About the author

mikelgan

Mike Elgan is a Silicon Valley-based columnist who writes about technology and culture. His work appears in a variety of publications, including Computerworld, Datamation, PC World, InfoWorld, MacWorld, ITWorld, CIO, the San Francisco Chronicle. Subscribe to Mike's e-mail newsletter, Mike's List, and follow him on Twitter, Facebook, Digg and elsewhere by visiting http://elgan.com.

(sorry, you need Javascript to see this e-mail address)| Read more posts by .

Posted in iPad, Top stories |