Mobile menu toggle

Apple TV vs. Roku 4: Which box will hold your attention?

By

Apple TV versus Roku 4
Which streaming box has earned a place by your TV?
Photo: Evan Killham

Those on the lookout for a new streaming box this fall will have a tough decision to make when the fourth-generation models of both Apple TV and Roku hit the market. And while they both have some solid features, which one you end up buying depends a lot on what you already own.

Here’s how the two streamers measure up.

Size

Let’s start basic: Which one is going to take up more space in your entertainment center? Maybe it doesn’t matter to most people, but I have four gaming systems, a cable modem, a router, and an HDMI hub on there already as well as the TV itself. Space is at a bit of a premium in my living room, so every square inch could end up counting.

Roku 4’s tech specs list dimensions of 6.5 x 6.5 x 0.8 inches — and a weight of 0.9 pounds, if that matters — while the Apple TV is a smaller (but taller) 3.9 x 3.9 x 1.4 inches. That translates to a footprint of 15.21 square inches for Apple’s box and 42.25 square inches for Roku’s. So the Roku 4 is going to take up about three times as much shelf space as the Apple TV, which is about as superficial a comparison as we could make, but we have to start somewhere.

Resolution

Here is where the Roku 4 has an advantage over Apple TV provided you have the gear to support it. Roku’s box can stream 4K content at a resolution of 3840 × 2160, and it will upscale standard HD to 4K. Apple’s output tops out at 1080p. If you don’t have a 4K or Ultra HD TV, however, this won’t matter to you. But it’s cool that it’s there.

Roku 4 homescreen
Roku 4 promises a “truly unbiased” search. We’re not sure what that means, but it may have to do with the cheapest options being on top.
Photo: Roku

Remotes

Here’s something that will affect everyone: How do the control devices compare? The two versions have some pretty significant differences, starting with batteries. Roku 4’s remote runs on two AA batteries, while Apple TV’s sports a rechargeable pack that the company claims “[provides] months of battery life on a single charge.” Roku had no information about battery life on its remote, so we don’t know how charge times compare.

Roku 4’s controller includes a headphone port for “private viewing,” which is a pretty nice feature if you don’t have a set of wireless headphones and/or don’t want to run a cable to your TV. And if you lose the thing, as is wont to happen, you can ping it from a button on top of the box.

Both remotes have a voice interface, with Apple TV’s running a version of iOS’s personal assistant, Siri. And the presentation at Apple’s event last month showed off some really cool features that let you make incredibly specific requests of Siri, like rewinding a show and turning on captions with a single voice command.

Apple TV
Apple TV has some great-looking navigation features.

Stuff that isn’t TV

The Roku 4 is made for streaming and maybe some gaming. But Apple’s being more ambitious with its box by incorporating it as the hub of its HomeKit smarthome framework. You’ll be able to use it to control your smart appliances and devices even when you’re not at home. And since the roster of HomeKit-enabled gadgets is finally expanding beyond plugs and into locks and thermostats, offsite control is getting to be a feature worth having.

Back on the gaming front, the Siri Remote has a touchscreen, accelerometer, and gyroscope that could make developing and playing games easier and more intuitive for those more accustomed to the mobile platform than dedicated consoles. But the Roku 4 sports a four-way directional pad that is likely going to be more precise than swipes. How they compare here is going to depend on developers using each console’s specific strengths in effective and creative ways, but they definitely have more options with Apple’s platform.

Price

This is what it all comes down to for a lot of people, and it’s another way that Roku is definitely ahead. The Roku 4 will cost $129.99 when it comes out at the end of the month. Apple TV has two versions depending on how much storage you want: The 32GB model will run $149, and the 64GB version will be $199.

If price is all you’re looking at, then you might want to save the 20 bucks. Roku is also quick to point out that its earlier models had a huge content advantage over earlier Apple TVs, but with a new OS and apps coming to Apple’s set-top, Cupertino could close that gap.

But we’re more excited about Apple TV’s extra-streaming features (and not just because of the nature of our site), so the difference in cost feels pretty justified. Still, it all depends on what you expect to get out of your set-top, and your priorities may differ. But for Apple fans who are already used to swiping and using Siri — and who also already have an extensive library of stuff on iTunes — it’s not really a tough decision.

  • Subscribe to the Newsletter

    Our daily roundup of Apple news, reviews and how-tos. Plus the best Apple tweets, fun polls and inspiring Steve Jobs bons mots. Our readers say: "Love what you do" -- Christi Cardenas. "Absolutely love the content!" -- Harshita Arora. "Genuinely one of the highlights of my inbox" -- Lee Barnett.

30 responses to “Apple TV vs. Roku 4: Which box will hold your attention?”

  1. dmin7b5 says:

    I might be more interested if Amazon builds an app for the Apple TV, and Synology builds a DS Video app. I get too much content through Prime and movies I’ve bought to go with Apple. Gaming looked kind of lame as well in their demo.

  2. herbaled says:

    You tell us how much storage the Apple TV has but not the Roku.

    • nathan kelly says:

      The Roku 3 has a micro sd slot. I have a 64gb card in mine. My assumption would be the Roku 4 also has a micro sd slot, which to me is a huge advantage over any device that doesn’t have expandable storage.

  3. Bird says:

    How in the heck does Apple come out with a smart box that doesn’t have 4K?!?!?

    • Lucus Bendzsa says:

      How in the heck can Roku not post storage!?!?!?!

      • Mister Salty says:

        I haven’t found how much storage the Roku 4 has built in, but it does have a microSD card slot so you can cheaply add to whatever is there.

    • Blair T says:

      It will do 4K, it’s just not enabled yet – we need to wait until Apple has the content ready, then a software update will enable it.

    • herbaled says:

      I really want 4K and so do a lot of the tech savy people who read CofM and such. However, Apple’s not stupid. Fact is, vast majority of consumers don’t watch what little 4K is available these days so they don’t care that much about Apple not having it.

      • mike3k says:

        I don’t. It’s a waste of money.

      • herbaled says:

        Cost aside: The 4K I’ve seen on OLED is stunningly beautiful with a picture that’s miles ahead of anything else out there.

        In 2 or 3 years OLED TVs & BlueRay players will be much more affordable, and there will be more and more 4K media.

        The price of the LG 55-inch OLED has gone from $15K to $3K in only two years.

    • parrotcam says:

      4k is NOT important. the big thing will be the App Store and if those tvOS apps will be as great as iphone/ipad apps. Roku, Amazon fire tv, google/android tv and even xbox 1 have all tried doing apps on TV but failed to be compelling devices. is there a need for apps on the TV? so far, it doesn’t seem important to the average person.

    • mike3k says:

      My TV doesn’t do 4K and I have no desire to get a 4K TV, so it’s a non-issue for me.

  4. jeff b says:

    Im not interested in Apples’s new Appe TV for a couple of reasons. But let me start with. I think Apple is making the same mistake Microsoft did with the XBOX ONE. When Microsoft announced the XBOX ONE they talked about the Kinnect and how great it was for watching TV through voice commands. They ignored Gamers, their core audience, who said they did not care about that. They just wanted great games

    Fast forward 2 years and Microsoft almost has dropped all mention of the Kinnect, and is now trailing the PS4 in sales. FYI Sony had the same feature, but they pushed great games. So they won the gamer audience that both are fighting for.

    Now Apple, Amazon, Roku, and Google are about to fight it out….. again. Wel l1st off, there is no 4K on Apple’s TV. Really? That decision makes no sense. Especially since there are even generic streaming boxes that offer 4K already. (And some of them are sold for 80 Dollars). Not to mention Apple just introduced phones that record in 4K, but they dont give their own customers the ability to watch what they recorded in 4K on their on TV box. Odd business decision there.

    This is how Apple is making the same mistake as Microsoft dis 2 years ago. The customers who are buying streaming boxes are buying them for one thing. To stream video content. Apple is showing off the ability to play games on it, however people who want to play games on their TV have a game system for that. Im not saying people wont play the games, but that will probably be a second or third use of the box. I am looking for a great streaming device. Not to mention, you need a Iphone as a game controller. What if you dont have a iphone?

    I’ll be passing on Apple’s TV this time around, I had the last generation Apple TV. I LOVE the Roku 4 because it supports 4K from Netflix, Amazon, Vudu, and Youtube. Not to mention they know their Target audience. People who want to stream video. Not play games. I have a PS4 and Wii U if I want to game.

    (I would get the new Amazon Fire but its not clear if 4K is supported by other providers or just Amazon content)

  5. harmoncollege says:

    The “unbiased” search means it searches across all the top channels, including Netflix, Hulu, Amazon Prime, Vudu, Redbox Instant, etc. and provides all options. If you search on Amazon Fire TV, you only get results for Amazon Prime. As for storage on Roku, you can plug a hard drive into it or put in a microSD card, so the storage capability is WAY more than Apple TV.

  6. catsarecool says:

    I love my Roku. I buy every new version that comes out. I probably won’t be buying the Roku 4 though. That is unless my TV breaks and I’m in the market for a 4K TV. But I probably will get the Apple TV, mostly due to the rumors of offering cable and local channels on it. Sling and Playstation Vue can do it, so I’m sure it will come to Apple too. They just need to agree on a price. If it works out good, then maybe I can cancel my Playstation Vue. The Vue is good (if you live in a service area), but the interface sucks. Hopefully Apple can do a better job.

  7. They want EFX says:

    whoever convinces AT&T to give them the sunday ticket for $399 and has Amazon, Netflix and Hulu wins for me…

  8. I own a bunch of Rokus and Apple tvs. I think for most people games won’t really matter in their decision. Apple tv will have two important advantages over Roku. Apple Music and (not sure about this) video apps. For example, there is a Turner Classic Movies app on the Ipad. Casting it to Apple tv looks like crap. If there is a Turner Classic Movies app on Apple TV which gives you a good picture, this would be huge. Otherwise Roku wins hands down. I’ll probably buy both.

  9. Lawrence Fawcett says:

    ever hear of amazon?

  10. Mister Salty says:

    “Unbiased search” means the Roku returns results from all of your available channels, where Amazon’s Fire TV and the Apple TV favor their respective paid services.

  11. Vicente E. Rodriguez says:

    Don’t worry, when Apple comes out with the sixth generation Apple TV, aka “Apple TV air”, it will be 5K compatible. This satirical technology moment was brought to you by the onion.

    • herbaled says:

      Perhaps not so satirical. Actually 8K video is already in development, although at some point the video picture will be perfected and there’ll be no improvement needed … or so I think at the moment.

  12. parrotcam says:

    i’ve tried amazon TVs, rokus and apple tv before, but never kept them because my 5 yr old xbox 360 did everything those did and more. It offered ‘core” games and streaming apps. For the Apple TV, All i’m really interested is are these new tvOS apps and would it be as great as iOS apps. What kind of games/apps are going to be on this platform? Can apple finally get developers interested in the TV?

    So far, Google, amazon, Microsoft haven’t gotten developers on board their TV platforms.
    I’m hopeful Apple can get the ball rolling on this with tvOS.

  13. stationstops says:

    I’m an iOS developer and have owned Apple TVs, Rokus, Google TVs, Chromecast, and Amazon Fire TV stick.

    I defnitely like Rokus the best because they don’t produce programming and are content-agnostic, so no holes in programming year after year due to protectionism – and the remote and interface are effortless – even the kids can use it. Wifi remote is also great.

    Apple TV and Chromecast are a no-go because they don’t have Amazon Video – this is a top-tier provider and just won more Emmys for original programming than Netflix – so blocking A-list services now or in the future is a no-go.

    • herbaled says:

      Good point about Apple TV not offering Amazon.. But, for me, there’s only so much TV programs I can watch … and I’m probably already watching too much. ;-)

      • stationstops says:

        Well, no one can – but All things being equal, I could care less about the differences in devices relative to the available programming

  14. Steve Philpot says:

    I have a 4K tv, but 4K content is limited, and regular HD is pretty dang good as it is. Besides the fact that streaming 4K content is a HUGE bandwidth hog. I’m a huge techie but I really could care less about 4K personally.

  15. jay says:

    Most important things are codi and plex! Maybe one drive or google drive would be good

Leave a Reply