Mobile menu toggle

5 gorgeous analog alternatives to suit every Apple Watch budget

By

Original Apple Watch models
It's time for a showdown. Photo: Apple
Photo: Apple

The Apple Watch is a watch in as much as the iPhone is a phone: It bears a resemblance to its titular device, but does so much more as well. That said, Apple’s focus on inviting fashion and watch journalists to yesterday’s “Spring Forward” keynote shows that Cupertino does view its new wearable device as an alternative to analog watches.

Now that we finally have a price tag for all the Apple Watch models, we can compare a few classic alternatives you could strap on your wrist instead. You won’t get the apps, or the ability to beam your heartbeat to a loved one, but if it’s a stylish status symbol you’re after, these are the timepieces the Apple Watch needs to beat.

Check out our picks to see if Jony Ive’s proclamation that Swiss watchmakers are “f*cked” is really true.

The entry-level model (sub-$500)

The Apple Watch starts at $349, with a price bump to $399 if you want the 42mm, rather than 38mm, size. In the classic watch world, that amount will buy you a vintage-looking timepiece from AVI-8’s Hawker Hunter collection (retail price: $330), modeled after the cockpit gauges found in 1950s jet planes. You won’t get any apps, but you will get a leather strap with white stitching, a presentation box and an information card about vintage airplanes.

The affordable luxury model ($500 – $750)

There are assorted Apple Watches in the $549 to $749 price range, with the difference being the type of strap you go for. These range from a White Sports Band at the cheaper end to a Soft Pink Modern Buckle leather strap at the somewhat pricier. When it comes to analog watches, this is also a crowded market, since it will pick you up something closer to the upper end of the affordable watch category, a market that is rapidly growing in popularity.

Personally, I’m a fan of the Citizen Promaster Sky CB0134-00E Eco-Drive Solar Watch seen above. It runs exclusively on power from both natural and artificial light sources, and comes with a feature that lets you easily test your charge level. While you’ll be re-juicing the battery on a daily basis, unlike the Apple Watch you won’t have to take it off to do so.

The semi-affordable luxury model ($949 – $1,049)

At the top end of the Apple Watch price bracket for most of us, the Stainless Steel bands will set you back around $1,000. For that same amount, you could take your pick of the Frédérique Constant Classics Range of Swiss watches, which give the appearance and stylish design associated with Geneva timepieces, but without the sell-your-kids-and-remortgage-your-house price tag.

I singled out the above rose-gold-plated, stainless-steel case model because it’s a strikingly attractive watch that, from the rose-gold color to the crocodile strap, I never thought I’d be attracted to. As with the Apple Watch, you also get an antireflective sapphire crystal frontage.

The big spender ($10,000 – $15,000)

Interestingly, the comparison between Cupertino’s upcoming wearable and a luxury analog watch starts to make sense at the Apple Watch Edition level. Once you start waving around five-figure price tags, it is clear that both fall into the same status symbol category.

So what could you buy with the money you’d otherwise spend on an Apple Watch Edition (or putting your kids through school)? How about the $10,200 Louis Vuitton Tambour: It’s a gorgeous analog timepiece from a brand not many people normally associate with watchmakers. Boasting a 45mm GMT Chronograph, this sleek watch’s blacked-out bezel is made from a lightweight-but-rugged material called Metal Matrix Composite, regularly used in the aerospace industry and Formula 1 cars.

The model you pick up in your private helicopter ($17,000)

One way of looking at the most expensive Apple Watch Edition is that it’s Apple completely losing sight of its original status as a company for rebels and misfits, which once sold the “computer for everyone” that was the original Macintosh. Another is to point out that, while $17,000 is more dough than I’m ever likely to drop on a watch (not to mention one that will be outdated within a couple years of its release), it’s peanuts when you’re talking about the world’s most expensive analog watches.

For the same $17,000 you’d spend on the most expensive Apple Watch Edition, you could pick up this attractive Rolex Cosmograph Daytona Men’s Watch. It’s one of the rarer, and therefore more sought after, timepieces Rolex makes — and a wait of upward of a year isn’t unheard of. It’s a gorgeous example of Rolex’s design, and unlike the Apple Watch Edition, will be worth considerably more a few years down the line. It won’t ever play Flappy Bird, though.

  • Subscribe to the Newsletter

    Our daily roundup of Apple news, reviews and how-tos. Plus the best Apple tweets, fun polls and inspiring Steve Jobs bons mots. Our readers say: "Love what you do" -- Christi Cardenas. "Absolutely love the content!" -- Harshita Arora. "Genuinely one of the highlights of my inbox" -- Lee Barnett.

19 responses to “5 gorgeous analog alternatives to suit every Apple Watch budget”

  1. Hildebrand says:

    4-1 win for Apple (the Louis Vuitton Tambour looks great!)

  2. Wayne Hunt says:

    As a dedicated fanboy who’s pretty much bought one of everything they’ve built since 2006, I was so disappointed by everything Apple yesterday. A slower, non-expandable, more expensive laptop (essentially a laptop-cased iPad with a keyboard), and a smart watch with an “18-hour” battery (useless) that they want literally hundreds of extra dollars just to choose the watch band you want over the white rubber band model.

    No thanks… The announcement yesterday convinced me to back the Pebble Time Steel on Kickstarter…

    • Doug Trace says:

      Couldn’t agree more, Wayne. On top of that, a watch with NO upgrade path. So I pay $350 to $17k for a watch that I can’t hand down?….yeah, not gonna happen.

      The Macbook is basically a point of entry to Apple for grandparents. Honestly the best thing announced was HBO Now. Looking forward to that.

      I’m also looking at the new Pebble. Looks FAR more attractive after yesterdays announcements. Like you, I own a ton of Apple stuff and enjoy the ecosystem. Very disappointing to see the direction Apple is taking. We’ll see how it goes in the future I suppose.

      • Wayne Hunt says:

        I’ve worn an original Pebble watch for about 14 months now. It does everything I need, has a 7 day battery life and cost me $129 at best buy. Sure, it’s not color, and it doesn’t have sensors to tell me how often to fart, but it’s alarm wakes me up every morning, I get the weather and I get notifications / texts without needing to whip out my phone during a meeting.. It’s all I need, but $250 for a color version? Winning…

      • ze_rusty says:

        Apple just a started a new business and they are competing companies from fossil to rolex. If you can’t buy rolex, you have an option.

      • tomhenning says:

        In 50 years the Apple watch will still do the same things that a Rolex can do now, and will also do then: tell you time, day, and date. What makes you think that a Rolex is of any interest to your son or daughter anyways? It tells you just three bits of information: day, date , and time, which is why people under 30 don’t wear watches any more.

      • Tom says:

        ^not true, people under 30 also wear them for fashion as well as telling the time. The apple watch is ugly as fuck and even it was free I wouldn’t wear one.

    • Cdp76 says:

      I was disappointed to the point of not buying the apple watch AND cancelling the pledge on the Time Steel.
      It’s making me rethink the whole smartwatch idea (and i’m wearing a Pebble Steel right now, which i will sell tomorrow).

      • Wayne Hunt says:

        If not intended sarcastically, I’d really like to know why. My original Pebble (not Steel) is great. I bought it on a whim and now it’s pretty much indispensable to me for everyday wear…

        I’m backing the Time Steel because I want the color screen and better ecosystem, but still with the same 7-day battery life. I don’t need nor want all the medical crap on the Apple Watch, and Apple Pay (reportedly) only works if you’re iPhone 6 and later. If I had a 6 already — if Apple Pay interested me at all — why would I need the Apple Watch to use at registers?

      • Cdp76 says:

        I’ll try to explain: I like my pebble steel, but I am selling it to get some money back before it devaluates on the Time Steel release. I could accept living without a smartwatch till july.
        I was disappointed by Apple over battery life and especially the price point: for me the sport is not an option because I have owned an alluminium watch in the past and i completely destroyed it (the material is just not hard enough for me.. It gets a dent whenever it touches anything). So the steel one has a cost that I cannot justify to me.. But the experience seems great and the integration with iOS will be far superior than what Pebble can get (apple fault of course). So I’m thinking cancelling my pledge because I fear that I will not be 100% happy compared to the stupid apple watch :(

      • Wayne Hunt says:

        A Well-thought-out reply sir, and I can agree. Unfortunately, the only way I’ll end up with an Apple Watch is when I can buy the basic Stainless 42mm (refurb maybe?) and buy a $20 stainless band for it off of Amazon/eBay from China. No way in bleep I’m giving $400 for what most stainless watches include for “free”…

    • Scott says:

      I’m sticking with my 2011 iMac 27inch, iPad Air 2 (128), iPhone 6 (128) and my Michael Kors watch. The watch was a drag, the MacBook was a drag, and hopefully they don’t use USB-C on their MacBook Pro’s in the future.

  3. BoltmanLives says:

    Other, not-so-precious ingredients take up most of the room. Apple gets to use less gold per cubic centimeter and still call it 18-karat. It gets to stretch its gold out further than, say, Rolex would, to make a watch this size and shape.

    • Wayne Hunt says:

      So I’m guessing that — all totaled, the cost to Apple for the Edition is less than $2,000 to build and package. $3,000 if I’m being generous. This is why I really believe Apple has lost their bleepy minds on this one… An overpriced, underpowered “laptop” and a grossly overpriced (gougingly so) watch that you can’t even use for a full day… Yay…

  4. popeyoni says:

    Apple Watch 18 Karat edition vs…. A car!

  5. Luke Dormehl says:

    Some nice choices here. One thing that was cemented writing this was just how personal and subjective taste in watches is. I love the sub-$500 watch on my list, but one of my colleagues hated it. That’s a challenge for the Apple Watch in my opinion: how do you stand out in a world where everyone wears the same watch? And, no, changing the strap isn’t the same as picking a different model entirely.

  6. Kan says:

    It’s almost as if you intentionally picked ugly watches to compare to the Apple Watch… For every price bracket apart from the Frederique Constant you can get far nicer offerings. Even in the lowest price brackets (Sport, Apple Watch) you can get good automatic watches (why would you ever pay over $20 for a quartz…). The suggestion that Louis Vuitton make a watch that’s worth $10k is equally laughable; by something from a respectable watchmaker that will hold its value….

Leave a Reply