Blogger Jon Accarrino of Methodshop reports that lines are already forming in NYC for iPhone 2.0, which is rumored to be launched on June 9 (the first day of Apple’s WWDC and Steve Jobs’ opening speech).
Jon went by Apple’s 5th Avenue store this morning and found a line of about 50 people all waiting for iPhones — or so retail staffers told him.
Jon thinks the liner-uppers are already waiting up for the new iPhone.
Noting that many in line are Asian, Jon speculates they are from NYC’s Chinatown, and are being paid to wait in line. But I find it hard to believe that people are willing to pay a line-sitter for two weeks or more — especially when there’s no indication there will shortages, which prompted the lines first time around.
Reading between the lines of Jon’s report, I’ll bet they are being paid to snap up dwindling supplies of iPhone 1.0 to be sent overseas. As long as Apple places restrictions on the number of iPhones people can buy (currently 5) and there are not yet official channels, there’ll be demand for grey market iPhones.
Leander Kahney is the editor and publisher of Cult of Mac.
Leander is a longtime technology reporter and the author of six acclaimed books about Apple, including two New York Times bestsellers: Jony Ive: The Genius Behind Apple’s Greatest Products and Inside Steve’s Brain, a biography of Steve Jobs.
He’s also written a top-selling biography of Apple CEO Tim Cook and authored Cult of Mac and Cult of iPod, which both won prestigious design awards. Most recently, he was co-author of Cult of Mac, 2nd Edition.
Leander has been reporting about Apple and technology for nearly 30 years.
Before founding Cult of Mac as an independent publication, Leander was news editor at Wired.com, where he was responsible for the day-to-day running of the Wired.com website. He headed up a team of six section editors, a dozen reporters and a large pool of freelancers. Together the team produced a daily digest of stories about the impact of science and technology, and won several awards, including several Webby Awards, 2X Knight-Batten Awards for Innovation in Journalism and the 2010 MIN (Magazine Industry Newsletter) award for best blog, among others.
Before being promoted to news editor, Leander was Wired.com’s senior reporter, primarily covering Apple. During that time, Leander published a ton of scoops, including the first in-depth report about the development of the iPod. Leander attended almost every keynote speech and special product launch presented by Steve Jobs, including the historic launches of the iPhone and iPad. He also reported from almost every Macworld Expo in the late ’90s and early ‘2000s, including, sadly, the last shows in Boston, San Francisco and Tokyo. His reporting for Wired.com formed the basis of the first Cult of Mac book, and subsequently this website.
Before joining Wired, Leander was a senior reporter at the legendary MacWeek, the storied and long-running weekly that documented Apple and its community in the 1980s and ’90s.
Leander has written for Wired magazine (including the Issue 16.04 cover story about Steve Jobs’ leadership at Apple, entitled Evil/Genius), Scientific American, The Guardian, The Observer, The San Francisco Chronicle and many other publications.
Leander is an expert on:
Apple and Apple history
Steve Jobs, Jony Ive, Tim Cook and Apple leadership
Apple community
iPhone and iOS
iPad and iPadOS
Mac and macOS
Apple Watch and watchOS
Apple TV and tvOS
AirPods
Leander has a postgrad diploma in artificial intelligence from the University of Aberdeen, and a BSc (Hons) in experimental psychology from the University of Sussex.
He has a diploma in journalism from the UK’s National Council for the Training of Journalists.
Leander lives in San Francisco, California, and is married with four children. He’s an avid biker and has ridden in many long-distance bike events, including California’s legendary Death Ride.
You can find out more about Leander on LinkedIn and Facebook. You can follow him on X at @lkahney or Instagram.
20 responses to “Lines Already For iPhone 2.0?”
All this talk circulating the internets of people supposedly lining up for iPhone 2.0 is just silly. I’m sure that most of these people are still trying to get their hands on iPhone 1.0. A few days ago, I stopped by the SoHo Apple Store, and there were 5 or 6 elderly Chinese ladies lined up outside. I asked a staff member inside, and she told me that they were waiting to see if the store would get any iPhones in stock that day. The ladies definitely didn’t fit the profile of iPhone-users. I’m pretty sure that any phones they get their hands on are destined to be shipped overseas.
I think the reason for the line is to get an iPhone and send it down to Cuba since the US just removed cell phone restrictions to Cuba.
It’s so they can be pissed off when the price is dropped in a few months. Will the early-early adopters never learn?
Given Apple’s marketing acumen, I wouldn’t be surprised if they didn’t hire these people to stand in line. Guerrilla marketing, and all that…
Engadget observes this line is for “no reason”:
» http://www.engadget.com/2008/0…
@Michael Zimmer: Interestingly, some thought it was Improv Everywhere. But when’s the last time Apple did something like that, if ever? (I don’t recall…)
I have to say it’s pretty sad that these people’s lives are so incredibly shallow and uninteresting that they would even consider doing this for one night, let alone 17 or 18 days. Time to reassess their priorities, I think. Good luck to them, I hope they end up happy, but I very much doubt they will.
Sorry guys for posting in comments but couldn’t find any contact email….
have you see this one?
http://my.break.com/content/vi…
oh my god
They’re running out of 1G iPhones, Occam’s Razor says…
Also, assuming they’re getting paid because they’re oriental is so flagrantly raciest it makes me sick. So, what, poor lil’ chinaman get paid to stand in line for big rich white man? What the fuck, man?
it’s not racist, ignorant, PC fool.
it’s an insightful observation and may have some validity.
The fact that it might sound racist doesn’t make it any less true … !
So the question is: is it less racist if it is true?