Mobile menu toggle

Apple Bloodies Samsung’s Nose In Australia, Gets Galaxy Tab 10.1 Pulled

By

galaxy-tab-10.1-vs-ipad-2

While Apple and Samsung’s globe-spanning IP lawsuit hasn’t made a dent in either company’s business up until now, the first real blow has landed… and it is Samsung walking away with the bloody nose, as a new development in Australia means Samsung can’t sell their iPad-like Galaxy Tab 10.1 tablet on the continent until further notice.

According to Apple’s Australian council, Stephen Burley, Samsung is infringing upon 10 Apple patents with the Galaxy Tab 10.1, including the “look and feel” as well as the iPad’s touchscreen technology.

Meanwhile, Samsung countered that the version of the Galaxy Tab 10.1 going on sale in Australia differed from the one being sold in the United States, although we’re not sure how markedly different they could possibly be.

Ultimately, the two councils decided that until Apple’s lawsuit against Samsung is resolved or Samsung wins court approval, Samsung will not sell the Galaxy Tab 10.1 in Australia, nor will they be able to advertise it.

This could potentially be a big blow, who has been accused of “slavishly” copying Apple’s designs. However, while Samsung’s nose might be trickling right now, there’s the possibility that Apple might find that the punch it just landed sprained their hand, with both parties agreeing that Apple will have to pay lost sales damages to Samsung if they lose their case in America.

If Apple agreed to that, they must think they have a strong case against Samsung.

[via Bloomberg]

  • Subscribe to the Newsletter

    Our daily roundup of Apple news, reviews and how-tos. Plus the best Apple tweets, fun polls and inspiring Steve Jobs bons mots. Our readers say: "Love what you do" -- Christi Cardenas. "Absolutely love the content!" -- Harshita Arora. "Genuinely one of the highlights of my inbox" -- Lee Barnett.

16 responses to “Apple Bloodies Samsung’s Nose In Australia, Gets Galaxy Tab 10.1 Pulled”

  1. supertino says:

    Interesting ruling. I am sure the judge found merit in Apple’s case otherwise why would they stop Samsung’s sales until an American case is resolved (which would be like guilty until proven innocent).

  2. Friends of Mac says:

    The truth is that this isn’t a HUGE financial victory for Apple but more a slap in the face to Samsung. Hey, I’m all for competition but there are rules and guidelines. Innovate, Samsung, and you’d sell more products.

    -Chris
    http://friendsofmac.net

  3. SimonBannister says:

    I just paid $22,87 for an iPad2-64GB and my girlfriend loves her Panasonic Lumix GF 1 Camera that we got for $38,76 there arriving tomorrow by UPS. I will never pay such expensive retail prices in stores again. Especially when I also sold a 40 inch LED TV to my boss for $675 which only cost me $62,81 to buy. Here is the website we use to get it all from, GrabPenny.com

  4. mollyfud says:

    I guess Apple is that scared of competition! I guess can you blame them when Microsoft cleaned their clock and almost sent them out of business in the desktop market! 

  5. I?o? Morillo says:

    What an immature commentary full of senseless facts.

  6. David Stone says:

    Samsung’s innovation prior to copying Apple’s ideas was the Samsung Instinct.  It sucked.

  7. mollyfud says:

    True. I mean 90% market share is a tight contest, right! 

  8. pennstate says:

    Check out this awesome apple blog!
    http://applefanboynews.com/ 

  9. Hampus says:

    Not really, they are simply, like most other big companies, protecting their patents and intellectual property.

Leave a Reply