One of Ireland’s largest newspapers told readers Tuesday morning not to expect any photos of Taylor Swift performing during her two sold-out concerts in Dublin.
The Irish Times passed on photographing her shows because of a restrictive contract Swift’s people ask shooters to sign. The contract gives the photographer a “one-time-only” use on the photos yet allows Swift unlimited rights to use the images for publicity and promotion.
Such contracts by entertainment figures are nothing new, except Swift famously called out Apple for initially withholding royalties to musicians during the free three-month trial period of the new Apple Music service.
While her stand, which came in the form of an open letter on her Tumblr page, forced Apple to reverse course, it attracted the ire of photographers who called her a hypocrite. If Swift is questioning why Apple expects performers to give their music away, some in the photo community are wondering why she is believes she has a right to use their work for free promotion.
“The terms and conditions of the contract are exceedingly restrictive and just no feasible for a working newspaper website,” deputy picture editor Brenda Fitzsimmons said in Tuesday’s Irish Times article.
British music photographer Jason Sheldon started the conversation on June 21 in his blog Junction10, in which he printed a copy of the contract and asked “How are you any different to Apple? If you don’t like being exploited, that great, make a huge statement about it and you’ll have my support. But how about making sure you’re not guilty of the very same tactic before you have a pop at someone else.”
Sheldon posted a response from a Swift spokesperson the next day, saying photographers retain the copyrights on their photos and are misrepresenting the contract.
The Irish Times article implied artists like Swift are going beyond usual protocol to protect any potential revenue sources and wondered if the next step would be a clampdown on smart photo photography by fans at shows.
David Pierini is a former newspaper writer and long-time photographer. Considered a luddite by most of his friends, they did not believe him when he broke the news that he would be writing for a technology website. He is fascinated by human nature and would love to cultivate stories about the people driving the tech bus. Reach out to him at [email protected].
9 responses to “Irish newspaper refuses to give Taylor Swift free publicity photos”
Why is this on Cult of Mac?
Well, if someone needs to explain it you probably don’t really want to know…
If you are looking for extra cash in the range of 50 bucks to 300 bucks on daily basis for doing easy jobs from comfort of your house for few h each day then read more here…
I know, I know. It’s just I think it’s pointless to have news like this just because she had something to do with Apple for a second.
Way more relevant than a lot of the junk CoM posts.
Point made. I hate her too ;)
As a freelance photographer, I would not sign Taylor’s release. The potential loss would not be much but her potential gain from free use of an image is huge. How can she take such a stance with Apple and do this to photographers?
“The contract gives the photographer a “one-time-only” use on the photos yet allows Swift unlimited rights to use the images for publicity and promotion.”
I have a contract with myself that prohibits me buying, and if possible ever listening to this greedy little country ‘ho.
Yeeehawww!
Thank goodness! Yay Irish Times! Way to read a contract and stand behind your interests and the interests of your staff and stringers!