Mobile menu toggle

The Real Reason Apple Is Suing Samsung

By

Apple says Samsung's phones and tablets, like the Galaxy S above, rip off its designs.
Apple says Samsung's phones and tablets, like the Galaxy S above, rip off its designs.

The blogosphere is seething today with theories about why Apple is suing Samsung, one of its key suppliers and partners.

It’s been suggested that Apple has little interest and chance of winning a “look and feel” lawsuit, otherwise known as “trade dress.” It’s a tactical move, a way to win concessions from either Samsung or Google. Silicon Alley Insider, for example, says it’s to force Google to charge hardware makers for Android, which is currently free.

But the real reason is this: Apple is pissed off with getting ripped off. And it has a good chance of winning, because it has won several trade dress lawsuits before.


As is often the case with Apple, the company has explained itself in simple and direct terms. Yesterday Apple’s PR department put out a statement that said, essentially, the company is tired of getting ripped off.

“It’s no coincidence that Samsung’s latest products look a lot like the iPhone and iPad, from the shape of the hardware to the user interface and even the packaging. This kind of blatant copying is wrong, and we need to protect Apple’s intellectual property when companies steal our ideas.”

For some reason, a lot of pundits are loath to take Apple at face value. Perhaps it’s the company’s penchant for secrecy and obfuscation (remember when Steve Jobs said the iPod would never do video, just before the iPod did video?).

But in my experience, Apple and Steve Jobs are often quite truthful and direct when it comes to explaining motives. Just look at Steve Jobs’ open letter on DRM, or Thoughts on Flash. They quite clearly explain Jobs’ thinking. However, both were greeted by volumes of analysis that misinterpreted his reasoning, second guessed his motives and tended towards the conspiratorial.

There’s nothing underhand about Apple’s suit against Samsung. It’s a straight shot at getting the court to prevent Samsung from selling “blatant” copycat products.

Apple has a history of winning trade dress claims. In the late 1990s, when the fruity see-through iMacs were riding high, Apple won several trade dress claims against companies selling copycat iMacs.

In 1999, Apple sued eMachines, Daewoo and Future Power for knocking off the iMac’s distinctive look and feel. It also launched an investigation against an Australian company, FishPC, for selling a machine similar to the iMac.

Apple won an injunction against eMachines, and settled out of court with Daewoo and Future Power. In all cases, the infringing machines were pulled from the market.

A similar result against Samsung would be huge — but not unprecedented.

  • Subscribe to the Newsletter

    Our daily roundup of Apple news, reviews and how-tos. Plus the best Apple tweets, fun polls and inspiring Steve Jobs bons mots. Our readers say: "Love what you do" -- Christi Cardenas. "Absolutely love the content!" -- Harshita Arora. "Genuinely one of the highlights of my inbox" -- Lee Barnett.

19 responses to “The Real Reason Apple Is Suing Samsung”

  1. ConnorJackTurnbull says:

    Again, COM, please proofread your posts ;) “In both cases, Appel won injunctions”

  2. GregsTechBlog says:

    One could say Apple doesn’t have to stop at Samsung. So many Android features are direct copies of those found on iOS. From the evidence Apple has put forward on this case, I can see why they went after Samsung.
    It’s a dangerous move though, because Samsung is one of their biggest suppliers. But, at the same time, Apple is one of Samsung’s biggest customers, so they may not be so willing to cut Apple off over a lawsuit.

  3. chano says:

    Starting with Samsung was a wise, considered choice. Samsung has many reasons to blink on this. And Apple can show that it has always dealt with Samsung even-handedly in all things.

  4. techdude550 says:

    Hey, give me a break, Apple! And all your KoolAid drinking Fanbois Steve worshipers! They changed lots. They…um…moved the digital clock from the center to the right! They…reversed the little nubby thingy on the battery charge indicator so it points the other way! They made the signal strength bars a tiny bit taller and less wide. They… made it a teeny bit bigger! They…changed the time on the analog clock app icon! They… oh crap, okay, it’s a blatant ripoff.

  5. BeachWar says:

    Project much?

  6. techdude550 says:

    Yeah, I do. Projects, projects, projects. It’s I seem to do. If it ain’t work, it’s the house or the yard or the car.

  7. techdude550 says:

    *It’s ALL I seem to do.

  8. Anna@ Turtle trading says:

    I guess, Apple is trying too hard to make us believe they are the only ones driving technology and innovation. I like Apple products, and seems that this time they have a point against Samsung. They look very similar.

  9. Sahanatrymytech says:

    the previous post about the Samsung music player design is similar to of iPhone so the lawsuit can be reversed as well as for now….
    but the reason for this step from Apple is about the supremacy at the top of smartphone

  10. eddieever says:

    the “real” reason is that if they let Samsung get away with it ANYONE can get way with it. its not like Samsung is going to sue over a lookalike from another company. Within 2 years every loser phone maker will have an iPhone lookalike.

Leave a Reply