Infoworld Agrees: OS X “Threats” Overblown
8:43 pm, February 23rd, 2006, lkahney
It’s nice for once not to be utterly alone in my opinions.
Earlier this week I wrote the recent security “threats” to OS X are overblown in a column entitled Mac Attacks a Load of Crap.
Most people disagreed. John Dvorak, for example, says malware is “good news for Mac users because now security holes will be fixed early, and users will learn to become aware of these things. It’s a little bit like getting the mumps. You do not want to get this ailment as an adult.”
But veteran tech reporter Tom Yager at Infoworld, who’s as sober and levelheaded as they come, says the panic is much ado about nothing. He writes:
“… rather than marking the first viruses to infiltrate the Mac OS X fortress, as many press reports claimed, the vulnerabilities are among many potential security risks that Apple continuously and proactively tracks. Furthermore, the “critical” label affixed to the viruses by security vendors are alarmist, inciting a code-red threat level for potential security risks that Mac users can avoid through commonsense precautions.
A media feeding frenzy has erupted over the OS X Leap.A worm and the Safari browser filesystem metadata proof-of-concept exploit. It is a nonstory that has been given legs by virus software vendors that get their names in the papers by branding as extremely critical malware that’s been harmless to date — the very same vendors that then admit that one check box’s worth of tilting the balance between convenience and safety is all that’s required.”
Posted by lkahney in Apple, Media, Software | Comment on this article
