Top stories

Apple Now Accepting iPad Apps, Planning “Grand Opening” of iPad App Store

Apple is now accepting iPad apps for a “grand opening” of the iPad App Store, according to an email just sent to registered developers.
“iPad will begin shipping soon and your opportunity to be part of the grand opening of the iPad App Store starts today,” the email says.
There’s no details about when the store’s grand [...]

Security Expert: “Mac OS X Is Safer, But Less Secure”

20100319-ipwned.jpg

Tech site H-Online has an interesting story today, quoting security expert Charlie Miller about his forthcoming talk at the CanSecWest conference next week.
He says OS X is full of security holes. There are lots more than in Windows, he claims.
And yet: OS X is a safer system to use. Why? Because, in the words [...]

Apple Devotes Entire Home Page To Jerome York Obituary

20100318-york.jpg

If ever you needed a sign that Apple was a different kind of technology company, this is it.
What other computer manufacturer would remove its top-selling, hype-inducing, industry-altering new product from the prime spot on its website home page, and replace it with an obituary to an investor?
This is one of those “Here’s to the [...]

Coming Soon: Steve Jobs, the Sitcom

Fake Steve creator Dan Lyons just signed a deal to bring Steve Jobs to another small screen near you.
The half-hour series called “iCon” is billed by the presser as “a savage satire centering on a fictional Silicon Valley CEO whose ego is a study in power and greed.”
Making sure the barbs prick will be the [...]

H.264 Will Stay Royalty-Free for Free Internet Video Through 2016

H.264 is a very cool compression standard indeed, and intimately familiar to most Mac users as Apple’s own codec of choice for iTunes, Quicktime and the iPod. It’s also the codec driving YouTube and Vimeo, and the one used for streaming HTML5 video by both Google Chrome and Apple Safari.

The only problem? H.264 is neither free nor open-source. If you’re Apple and you want to use H.264 to serve HTML5 video in your browser, you need to pay MPEG LA, the owners of the codec, a $5 million licensing free. This has raised some eyebrows by the likes of Mozilla Firefox, who want HTML5’s video compression standard to be the free, open-source Ogg Theora. Their argument, summarized, is it’s foolish to build the next decade’s internet video standards upon the back of a licensed codec when there’s a free alternative that works nearly as well.

Today, MPEG LA confused the debate a bit by announcing that H.264 will stay royalty-free for free Internet Video until 2016…. but while it probably ends the Internet Video codec battle, it’s not a development that ends the debate.

As I understand it, here’s what MPEG LA’s extension means: if you are building a browser that support HTML5 video using the H.264 codec, you still need to pay the licensing fee… but sites serving H.264 internet video don’t have to pay anything for the next six years. If you charge for your video, you need to pay; if you want to support H.264 HTML5 video in your browser, you have to pay.

In other words, the next five or six years offers H.264 more time to become an entrenched Internet video standard. At the end of that six years, though, MPEG LA can start collecting their licensing fees from video sites who are serving up all their video using HTML5 and H.264.

Now, MPEG LA might extend their licensing-fee waiver indefinitely… but there’s the chance they won’t. That uncertainty principle should at least raise an eyebrow. If H.264 becomes the Internet video standard by 2016, this five year amnesty might be a very lucrative gamble on the part of MPEG LA: they will be able to draw upon a much larger and more entrenched Internet video user base.

In the end, though, the concerns are probably moot: H.264 is already Internet video’s entrenched standard, and while Mozilla’s got some very real and eloquently stated objections to H.264, I think it’s already too late. Mozilla’s fighting not a losing battle, but a battle already lost.

If you enjoyed this article:
Subscribe via RSS or email, or follow us on Facebook and Twitter

About the author

John Brownlee

John Brownlee has written about a lot of things for a lot of different places, including Wired, Playboy, Boing Boing, Popular Mechanics, Gizmodo, Kotaku, Lifehacker, AMC, Geek and the Consumerist. He lives in Berlin with a charming girlfriend against whom he is currently enjoying a thirteen game cribbage winning streak, and a tiny budgerigar punningly christened after Nabokov's most famous pervert. You can follow him here on Twitter.

Email the author | Read more posts by John Brownlee.

5 comments

    the problem with h264 is that it’s patent encumbered, so that even a free and open source implementation of the codec would fall under the patent.

    This may be a very naive question, but what would it take for MPEG LA to open source the software?

    This article makes it sound like it’s a $5M flat fee to license h.264 which is not quite right.

    H.264 $5 million dollar myth:
    http://obamapacman.com/2010/02/five-million-dollars-expensive-h264-license-myth/

    @nabil2199
    You can’t be more wrong. Companies have been using H.264 in their product for 7 years now, it’s not encumbered in any way.

    psssst (nudges Mozilla)

    Could the major stakeholders just buy MPEG LA with petty cash?

Add your comment

Name(Required)

Mail (required, but not published)

Website

Comment

Buy Inside Steve's Brain Buy from Amazon.com Buy from Barnes & Noble