Nadia Digicam Connects To Mac To Judge Your Photos’ Composition

Nadia Digicam Connects To Mac To Judge Your Photos’ Composition

Your average digicam already takes care of almost every step of the photographic process for you. From selecting an ISO, to autofocus, to opening the aperture, to adjusting the shutter sped, today’s digicam is truly an idiot-proof affair… providing said idiot is trying to take pictures of it, as opposed to, say, eating it.

Unfortunately, while the hardware is streamlined enough that any swollen-tongued moron can use it, photographic composition itself is still very much thwartable by the dumb and untrained.

Enter the prototypical Nadia digicam, which eschews an LCD live view display for a simple read-out gauging a photograph’s composition against its own programmed aesthetic beliefs in percentage form.

Inside, there’s a Nokia N73 cellphone, communicating with a Mac via Bluetooth, which is in turn running an “aesthetic inference engine” linked to Acquine. Unfortunately, Acquine’s aesthetic taste seems pretty questionable: Goatse.cx (Wikipedia link, work safe) scored an astonishing 67.5%, for example, while a photo of the Nadia itself scores a paltry 32.5%.

Still, the theory’s sound. After all, digicams already do everything short of telling you if your shot is good, and they already boast every other software feature under the sun in the ongoing quest for brand differentiation. Why stop there?

DON'T MISS
Check Out This Guy’s Amazing Guitar Solo on an iPad

[via Gadget Lab]

About the author

John BrownleeJohn Brownlee is news editor here at Cult of Mac, and has also written about a lot of things for a lot of different places, including Wired, Playboy, Boing Boing, Popular Mechanics, Gizmodo, Kotaku, Lifehacker, AMC, Geek and the Consumerist. He lives in Cambridge with his charming inamorata and a tiny budgerigar punningly christened after Nabokov's most famous pervert. You can follow him here on Twitter.

(sorry, you need Javascript to see this e-mail address)| Read more posts by .

Posted in Cameras, Hardware, News |

  • hobster

    While I agree that aesthetics is very subjective, this camera supposedly rates *composition* aesthetics, not the object itself. So it could eventually make sense that the two examples given in the article (Goatse and Nadia) could be correct in their *composition* assessment.

  • http://loansbadcredit.livejournal.com/ Emmett Longstaff

    By far the most concise and also current information I came across for this topic. I am sure pleased that I discovered your page by accident. I will be subscribing to the feed so that I’m able to obtain the most recent updates. Enjoy all the stuff here.

  • http://www.simpool.betteryou.co/ Eugene Gederman

    Good read, adding you to my bookmarks. Thanks for your time