Microsoft Mobile Division ‘All Shook Up’ Over Apple, Google Success

Microsoft Mobile Division ‘All Shook Up’ Over Apple, Google Success

Microsoft is expected to overhaul its entertainment and devices group as the desktop software giant finds itself out-muscled in a bruising battle between Apple and Google. The division – responsible for the Windows Phone, Zune and Xbox – will likely lose its chief technology officer, reports say.

Although the division made $1.67 billion in sales for the first quarter of this year, Microsoft is being outmaneuvered as technology increasingly goes mobile. J. Allard, the division’s chief experience officer and chief technology officer, is expected to leave the company in the wake of Microsoft’s decision to kill his dual-screen Courier tablet.

What the Wall Street Journal describes as “major organizational changes” could also impact Microsoft’s Windows Phone 7, the company’s smartphone software expected to start selling this fall. Microsoft’s handset-related business has shrunk in the wake of growing success by Apple’s iPhone and multiple Android-based phones.

“Although it was an early player in the market for sophisticated wireless phones known as smartphones, Microsoft has stumbled badly in recent years with its Windows Mobile operating system for handsets,” Wall Street Journal reporter Nick Wingfield writes.

Along with tablets and phones, the reported shakeup would come as Microsoft also experiences trouble competing with Apple’s iPod touch. The Zune HD failed to counteract Apple’s iPod touch, increasingly being marketed as a game machine. The touch, along with the iPhone, grabbed 19 percent of the gaming market, according to a report earlier this year.

DON'T MISS
WSJ: Microsoft workers have to hide their iPhones from management

[via AppleInsider and WSJ]

About the author

Ed Sutherland

Ed Sutherland is a veteran technology journalist who first heard of Apple when they grew on trees, Yahoo was run out of a Stanford dorm and Google was an unknown upstart. Since then, Sutherland has covered the whole technology landscape, concentrating on tracking the trends and figuring out the finances of large (and small) technology companies.

(sorry, you need Javascript to see this e-mail address)| Read more posts by .

Posted in News |

  • dave

    Um, maybe replace “sophisticated” with “complicated”…

  • shaunathan

    “is expected to leave the company in the wake of Microsoft’s decision to kill his dual-screen Courier tablet.”

    WHAT?!

    Shouldn’t the courier be the direction Microsoft should go to stay relevant? Mark my words this is a bad move for M$.

  • BoxMac

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA !!!!!

    Holy SHIT ….

    I fucking KNEW that “Courier” piece of SHITE was doomed from the start ….

    Zune ….
    Windows7 Mobile ….
    Why are people still talking about this bloated, irrelevant company ?

  • Gazoobee

    The Courier was always a bad idea, but it wasn’t really a “product” so much as just a technology demo and a rendering, it also wasn’t “Allard’s” he was just the latest monkey tasked with making something out of the research.

    The article would be more accurate if it said something along the lines of Allard “championing the concept of a Courier style computer,” instead of implying it was an actual product that was “his baby.” AFAIK that’s just not true.

  • Bob Forsberg

    I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again here. Microsoft is the problem, not the execs who are leaving or their lack of hardware design.

    Private and business users of Microsoft OS software realize it dominates the world. Exposed to Microsoft OS in many forms, needing to use it in our daily lives, we want something better when we can make the choice.

    We have seen Microsoft at its best and worst and really don’t want it in our personal lives when we can avoid it. Microsoft needs to put blame where blame is due.

    Even if we have the best big screen and sound system on the block, there are other places we will go to for entertainment.

    Microsoft is a software company and they’ve failed to get that right. How can they expect to be a hardware company on a level with Apple?