27% of e-reader owners wish they had an iPad instead

27% of e-reader owners wish they had an iPad instead

A few short months ago, the Kindle seemed completely unassailable. While Amazon’s e-reader was hardly a tech revelation, before the iPad, it didn’t need to be: Amazon’s gigantic e-book store engorged with millions of $9.99 titles and free online connectivity through Whispernet was a huge wager that other companies struggled to meet.

In the wake of the iPad, though, the Kindle’s prospects look bleak. Before they’ve even released it, the iPad has managed to slaughter the Kindle in the eyes of the gadget-buying product. Case in point: ChangeWave Research has surveyed 3,171 consumers about their e-readers, and 27% say they’d rather have picked up an iPad… if it had been available at the time they picked up their original e-reader.

It’s a hypothetical exercise, of course: — despite the headlines on some blogs, those surveyed aren’t saying they would have waited for the iPad — but it’s still impressive that Apple has managed to impress so many existing Kindle owners with a device that costs more in both initial expenditure and e-reading upkeep in every way. But it’s also unsurprising: just like the iPod made all other MP3 players on the market look like antediluvian crapgets, the iPad’s done the same to e-readers.

DON'T MISS
Study: E-Readers Must Be More Than Electronic Newspapers

About the author

John BrownleeJohn Brownlee is news editor here at Cult of Mac, and has also written about a lot of things for a lot of different places, including Wired, Playboy, Boing Boing, Popular Mechanics, Gizmodo, Kotaku, Lifehacker, AMC, Geek and the Consumerist. He lives in Cambridge with his charming inamorata and a tiny budgerigar punningly christened after Nabokov's most famous pervert. You can follow him here on Twitter.

(sorry, you need Javascript to see this e-mail address)| Read more posts by .

Posted in iPad, News |

  • Scott

    The iPad is not a proper eReader. With a backlit screen it just isnt the same. People who suffer from eye strain using monitors will still not be able to read books on the iPad.

  • IcyFog

    Yeah the iPad is not a proper e-reader, it’s more. Also, maybe the 27 percent who want an iPad instead of a Kindle don’t have the eye-strain problem.

  • porkchop1234

    I’m thinking many of these peope are seeing the ipad as a multi media mobile device. Not only can it do ebooks but if can also surf, play movies video game email etc etc etc. The hardcore readers would probably frown on an ipad they’re more interested in tech that does only one thing reallly well which is ebooks.