Apple and Samsung have been duking it out in court for quite sometime now, with Apple claiming that the Korean electronics giant has been “slavishly” copying its iOS products to use in Galaxy line of smartphones and tablets. In its case against Samsung’s Galaxy Tab, Apple has leaned heavily on two specific patents for its defense, both having to do with the exterior of the iPad.
As if to point out the absurdity of Apple patenting the exterior of a tablet, Judge Koh, presiding over the case, notably held up both the Galaxy Tab and iPad side-by-side and asked those in the court to tell which was which from a distance. It took lawyers on both sides of the aisles a few seconds to answer the question correctly.
The judge’s point seems simple. Sure, the Galaxy Tab may look like the iPad, but Apple can’t patent that appearance… and to prove her point, she made note that in 1994, a television network portrayed the look of a tablet much before the iPad or Galaxy Tab came on the scene. If true, this could seriously destroy Apple’s case.
Here’s the tablet in question, mocked up by the television network Knight-Ridder:
Looks familiar, doesn’t it? If this argument is accepted, it could seriously harm Apple’s claim against Samsung, as there would be prior art proving that Apple was not the first to come up with the idea behind the modern tablet.
As noted by Bloomberg, the judge looking over the case has said that Samsung may have looked to Apple for a few features, but that Apple may have looked to this 1994 mock-up for a few clues on how to build a tablet. Uh-oh, Apple.
While I think that Apple is a little far reaching when it says that it created the original tablet, I think they may have some ground regarding Samsung breaking a few patents. We’ll know the full ruling later this summer.
11 responses to “This Tablet From 1994 Is Hurting Apple’s Defense Against Samsung [Video]”
what about the apple newton
Not to be insulting, but I don’t think this author understands either the law in general, or this case in particular. The errors are many and the arguments are patently ridiculous.
I don’t want to waste the effort on listing the many things wrong, but for just one example, Apple is *not* in fact trying to get a “patent on the appearance” of a tablet.
Narrator has Apple DUO Computer on his desk in background, plus Apple Newton Table PDA, Plus this video from 1990 for “Future Apple Table Technologies” infomercial from Apple.
Narrator has Apple DUO Computer on his desk in background, plus Apple Newton Table PDA, Plus this video from 1990 for “Future Apple Table Technologies” infomercial from Apple. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WPS1DMlzz0M
I think that since it was hard telling which is which this proofs the samsung is a copy of the iPad. If not it would be a clear choice
Come on man, pay attention to your girl, not just your “newspaper of the future”!!!
That’s like saying you can’t get a patent on an invisible plane because it was in Wonder Woman 60 years ago.
So, newspapers saw this coming almost 20 years ago and still totally screwed it up. Now they go out of business regularly and I’m supposed to care? Nice.
Since 1980 i personally followed the tech industries especially apple and microsoft…
Steve jobs NEVER invented anything and he admittedly said that GOOD ARTISTS COPY AND GREAT ARTISTS STEAL… thats HIM…
So, this is NOT news as we know if we really open our eyes and mind that APPLE always copy, steal and buying other inventions…
So to those istupid, ifans, isheep, imorons, iturd and izombies STOP defending APPLE…
What about Apple’s own mock video the “Knowledge Navigator” from 1987?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HGYFEI6uLy0
blah blah blah remember when patent cases were only filed if the products were like 90% similar? blah blah blah now every one sues over everything all the time and its retarded blah blah blah…