Today in Apple history: Gizmodo tears down a lost iPhone 4 prototype

By

Gizmodo buys iPhone 4 prototype
The iPhone 4 prototype bought by Gizmodo came disguised as an iPhone 3GS. But a teardown showed big differences inside.
Photo: Gizmodo

April20April 20, 2010: A day after the most high-profile iPhone leak in history, Gizmodo dissects a prototype iPhone 4, publishing the teardown and showing the world exactly what’s inside the soon-to-be-released device.

The iPhone 4 prototype, accidentally left in a bar by 27-year-old Apple software engineer Gray Powell, quickly becomes the biggest story in the tech world.

And that’s where the trouble begins.

The iPhone leak of the century

Tech news site Gizmodo bought the device for $5,000 from a bar patron who found it after Powell’s historic screwup. The tech publication began posting a series of stories that fueled a massive controversy, not least because of Apple’s reaction to its secret prototype.

Gizmodo’s first hands-on look at the iPhone 4 came on April 19, one-and-a-half months before Steve Jobs introduced the device at Apple’s Worldwide Developers Conference (the last iPhone introduction of his career).

Although the prototype iPhone 4 was disguised as a last-gen iPhone 3GS, Gizmodo’s teardown revealed details about the upcoming design changes: its larger battery; its thinner, more squared-off form factor, and more.

iPhone 4 prototype fuels controversy

Some observers accused Gizmodo of breaking the law for buying the prototype. The biggest controversy, however, would result from Apple’s aggressive response to the leak.

A week after Gizmodo’s big scoop, police raided the apartment of Gizmodo editor Jason Chen. The raid was ordered by the Rapid Enforcement Allied Computer Team, a California task force commissioned to investigate high-tech crimes. Apple was a member of the task force’s steering committee.

During the raid, Chen’s door was broken open because he wasn’t at home to answer it. While the editor did not get arrested, police seized external hard drives, four computers, two servers, phones and other items from his home.

Gizmodo iPhone 4 prototype
A day after spilling the beans on the iPhone 4 prototype, Gizmodo spills the device’s guts with a teardown.
Photo: Gizmodo

Apple becoming Big Brother?

The law enforcement action raised a number of questions about Apple, which divided opinion. On the one hand, Gizmodo had owned up to purchasing an iPhone that didn’t belong to it. But there was also a backlash against Apple: To some, it appeared as if the company’s insistence on control and secrecy had tipped over into arrogance.

The Gizmodo standoff came not long after Apple settled a lawsuit with reporter Nick Ciarelli, resulting in the shuttering of Think Secret. Ciarelli’s massively popular Apple rumor site had broken a number of high-profile stories.

The Daily Show’s Jon Stewart gave voice to growing concerns about Cupertino’s power and influence.

“You guys were the rebels, man, the underdogs,” Stewart said on his show. “But now, are you becoming The Man? Remember back in 1984, you had those awesome ads about overthrowing Big Brother? Look in the mirror, man!”

Fortunately, Powell — the engineer who lost the iPhone 4 — kept his job with Apple. He continues to work on iOS software. Somewhat amusingly, he lists “device security” as one of his interests on his LinkedIn profile.

Deals of the Day

3 responses to “Today in Apple history: Gizmodo tears down a lost iPhone 4 prototype”

  1. Earᴨ vv๐ᴦkιnց from հome fᴦom Ƨ тס Ꮾ h everყ ᑯaʏ, аnd g℮ᴛ pаid in the rαnge 1к‐3k at τh℮ eπԁ of ℮veгу weeк. Rеad ʍore ӏnfօ on fol|ංɯӏng weƄƽіτe NUBR.CO/uV9OuB

  2. Frank Malloy says:

    Ah, back in the days when Gizmodo actually stuck to reporting geek tech instead of turning into yet-another anti-Trump propaganda/hate site disguised as a geek tech blog.

  3. Future Burrito says:

    I know it’s been a while, but it was a stolen iPhone. This was made clear by first-hand accounts of the event at the time. Gizmodo attempted to ransom the phone back to Apple and failed miserably.

    I’m not sure of the reason for this revisionist history BS.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *