Opinion: Apple Still Drives the Technology Innovation Bus

After a decade of being the clear leader driving market trends in computing, Apple’s influence could wane in the post-Steve Jobs era, according to a thoughtful piece posted Tuesday at TG Daily.

Industry analyst Rob Enderle describes Apple’s amazingly diverse impact on wider market trends:

* The iPhone immediately became the gold standard for mobile phone manufacturers, resulting in an explosion of new devices and innovation across every mobile software platform;

* Apple created integration between power and graphics in computer processors that would not have been possible without the company’s commitment to OpenCL, a framework for writing programs that execute across CPUs and GPUs;

* Apple’s focus on design and higher margins resulted in the introduction of products such as the recently released Dell Adamo, a PC notebook designed and marketed to emulate Apple’s attention to every detail from the packaging inward, down to the absence of stickers promoting Microsoft Windows and Intel;

* The elegance of the user experience in Mac OS X virtually doomed OEMs’ embrace of Linux to a competition not with Apple but with Windows, an outcome which will affect the introduction of Google’s Android when it comes to market next year as well.

In short, Enderle writes, “Apple is at the core” of all recent change in the computer industry, that “as a result Apple’s efforts, the products we will see from a variety of vendors will be vastly more amazing than they otherwise would have been.”

None of the above is really subject to debate. Enderle goes on to question whether Apple can keep it up in the post-Jobs era, however, and this writer disagrees. Follow the jump to find out why.

Enderle sees the general lack of excitement from Apple’s last couple of release events, produced without Jobs, as indicative of waning leadership skills. He believes the introduction of Windows 7 may drive Apple — in the absence of Jobs — back to the position the company was in in the mid-90s. Now that other major vendors understand Apple’s approach, he writes, without Jobs or an apprentice who can continue his work, the changes we have seen in the past decade may stop coming.

It’s a given that no major corporation, in recent history, anyway, has been associated with a single individual the way Apple has been with Steve Jobs. And Apple will evolve into something different than it is today when Jobs’ influence becomes the stuff of legend rather than live and in person on a daily basis.

But even in the period of Steve Job’s greatest influence, Apple’s impact has come from the products themselves. If the products — the hardware and the software — as well as the business model of innovations such as iTunes and the AppStore, had not been transformative, the rest of the computer industry would not have been forced to innovate to stay competitive — no matter how brightly Steve Jobs’ personal aura shined in a keynote presentation.

And while no one waiting in the wings at Apple has the personal magnetism or child-like enthusiasm of Jobs on the presentation stage, as long as the company continues to innovate in the design studio and on the product front, because it is so far ahead of the competition today it should be able to continue driving innovation among the rest of the industry.

DON'T MISS
Woz Undaunted by Industry Slowdown

It says here that iPhone 3.0 and the inevitable iPhone hardware refresh are going to leave everyone scratching their heads, wondering how in the world to meet the new standard.

Enderle believes Windows 7 is going to be more like Win95 and less like Vista, but if Snow Leopard delivers a new user experience that continues to differentiate the Mac OS and helps increase the perceived value of Apple’s offering, Apple’s rich margins can be preserved and the company will retain the financial position it needs to perpetuate the cycle of design excellence and feature innovation that Steve Jobs put into motion.

People may one day grow tired of look-alike drones imitating the Steve Jobs dog and pony show, but they will never grow tired of using beautiful products that work the way they are supposed to work and that let people do cool things they never thought they might be able to do, or do so easily.

Apple, and the computer industry itself, ought to be less concerned with who may one day replace Steve Jobs and more with how to keep delivering ever more amazing products. And it doesn’t have to be three or four amazing new things a year, either. One or two every couple of years ought to do just fine.

About the author

Lonnie Lazar

Lonnie Lazar is a writer-musician-web designer-attorney. He writes about Apple for Cult of Mac and Mac|Life, and about VoIP and telecommunications for Voxilla. Follow Lonnie on Twitter @LonnieLazar, join the Cult of Mac on Facebook, and find Lonnie's photos on Flickr.

(sorry, you need Javascript to see this e-mail address)| Read more posts by .

Posted in Apple, Hardware, Opinions, Software, Steve Jobs |

  • brian

    Good points by you both. But, I don’t really buy into the Steve Jobs aura thing. Sure, the man could sell Apple-branded ice to eskimos, but the real reason everyone is so frettful about Job’s health and status as chief innovator is his position as dictator-for-life at Apple. His temper and hubris are legendary, however, so is his genius. Could you imagine if the iPhone was designed by committee? We’d have another Motorola ROKR. Wait… that happened. Anyway, much of Apple is what Steve wants, and many worry what will happen if a weaker and/or less visionary leader takes over. “Uh, the touchscreen thing would be nice, but I guess it would be easier and cheaper to put a keyboard on there…”

  • David

    Enderle is out of touch and dead wrong about all things Apple.

  • http://MyMac.com David Cohen

    Thoughtful and Enderle – goes together like Pig and Fly.

    Seriously, this is typical Enderle hackdom – he speculates as usual on his old theme of “Apple will eventually fail because of *insert stupid idea here*” . He does this every month because he is convinced that one day, when it happens, he will be able to take the credit for spotting it.

    Anyone who is “Principal Analyst” at a company that bears his name is already showing a limited imagination. Every article he writes proves it. I look forward to the Macalope ripping him yet another new one over this – but watch out, Lonnie, you might get caught in the crossfire for promoting this turnip.

  • JD

    While I hate to mention these two names, Bill Gates leaving MS and watching Ballmer ride that ship down the tracks has been a joke. I give Gates the credit that he built a very successful business, no matter how anyone thinks he did it.

    I thinks Jobs has done 10 fold the innovation and put quality products into the marketplace as both a hardware and software company that MS never did. IF Jobs does leave, I can’t imagine anyone that would take over to be anywhere as bad at running a company as Ballmer. The few times I have stumbled across an interview or article with Ballmer speaking it’s absolutly amazing anyone would trust this guy to run a company.

    While it would never be the same without Jobs running Apple, I think as long as his health permits his passion for the innovation, products and the company will keep him close by to guide it on the path it’s been for the past 10 years. Leading the industry while everyone else tried to figure out “how the hell did they do that?” :)

  • http://cultofmac.com Lonnie Lazar

    @David Cohen: I did, in the end, come to a position opposite Enderle. I’m sure some in the Mac community might wish for opposition to always be accompanied by dramatic spitting and popping, but I believe it’s possible to acknowledge someone elses opinion as both thoughtful and wrong. If someone wants to take me to task for “promoting” Enderle, they’d be doing so without having read and / or understood what I wrote.

  • ged

    Am I the only one who remembers the 250 “designs” for the iphone posted on the web before it appeared, NONE of which predicted a simple touch screen?

    Now ever other smart phone apes the phone that could not add any value to the mobile market place. Remember that other valuation pre-iPhone? The one that said the Apple could add “no new value” to a cell phone?

    Not that Apple invented touch screen. I remember using a Hewlett-Packard gas-liquid chromatograph-mass spectrometer in 1987 that had a touch screen. However, the iphone interface set a new standard.

    I still want to talk to my computer, a la HAL in 2001.

  • http://web.me.com/mart_hill Martin Hill

    Rob Enderle is well-known for a history of smear campaigns against Apple, Linux, Sun and others and his very pro-Microsoft stance in every “analysis” he has every hawked to the press. He quite infamously championed SCO in their thinly-veiled Microsoft-sponsored campaign to sue Linux out of existence and every article he has ever written about the iPhone has had a negative spin.

    The New York Times back in Dec 2006 quite rightly banned the use of any of Enderle’s statements in recognition of his MS-boosterism and twisting of facts.

    I wouldn’t place much weight behind any of his opinions whatsoever.

    -Mart

  • http://chankya.com CHankya

    Hi,I wanna see some more advertisements in…
    http://WWW.wikipedia.com

  • NewJohnny

    What struck me as a sign of true innovation was when Apple revealed the iphone on the big screen for the first time– and was met with silence. You could tell people didn’t know what to make of this featureless phone. I remember my first thought was “That’s it? Just a screen? How is that cool?”

    It wasn’t until Jobs turned it on and started using it that people realized what it could do. Think different indeed.

  • http://www.cyclelogicpress.com Partners in Grime

    Yep, Apple is driving the tech bus and I’m impatiently standing at the bus stop waiting to see where the journey is going to take me.

  • chano

    Is there a point to this article? Apple was THE change agent even when its commercial prospects were dire. Why expect less innovation provocation and change bombshells now when it is no longer struggling?
    It is always a mistake to give the likes of Enderle any referral. The man is a cheap hooker in the tech world. He is the master of the false come-on to his paymasters whom he always disappoints. He is running out of fools to earn a buck from.
    Building on Enderle’s post is unnecessary. The point he was making was to merely restate the obvious.
    You know what they people who promote hookers, don’t you?