Microsoft: If You’re Using OnLive Desktop, You’re A Pirate

Microsoft: If You’re Using OnLive Desktop, You’re A Pirate

Earlier this year, OnLive debuted its OnLine Desktop app for the iPad. The app offers users a virtual desktop environment that includes Windows 7, Microsoft Office, Adobe Reader, and Internet Explorer (which allows iPad users to watch Flash-based web content). The service comes in both free and paid versions that include 2GB of cloud storage and OnLive plans to expand the service with more advanced plans for both end users and for businesses.

While users and reviewers have been largely happy with OnLive Desktop, it seems that Microsoft isn’t. After being mum on OnLive’s decision to release the app and service, Microsoft announced this week that it views OnLive as violating its license agreements and essentially pirating Windows.

At issue is the draconian puzzle that is Microsoft’s licensing system and how the company charges for virtual desktops.

Network virtual desktops like the ones OnLive is offering require a special virtual desktop access (VDA) license from Microsoft. If a company purchases Microsoft’s software assurance program to ensure updates and spread out the cost of software, a VDA license is included. Since most businesses opt for software assurance, they don’t have as much to worry about when it comes to virtual desktops – so long as the computers connecting to the virtual desktop can run Windows on their own. Since iPads can’t run Windows on their own, Microsoft requires that a separate VDA license be purchased for each iPad (or Android tablet or other thin client device) that connects to a virtual Windows desktop.

Is your head starting to ache trying to keep this straight yet?

Microsoft offers another type of licensing program called a Service Provider License Agreement (SPLA). This type of license is sold to companies that sell various IT or technology services and it allows them to license solutions that they provide to clients on an ongoing basis – the approach is somewhat similar to renting or subletting software and it’s useful for companies that offer services on a month to month or other contract basis where buying a software license doesn’t make sense because the client may move on at any time.

Sounds like a perfect solution for what OnLive is offering, right? It would be except one type of license that you can’t get with an SPLA is a VDA license. Microsoft instead tells companies to have their customers buy their own VDA license if they want access to a virtual desktop of the kind that OnLive is offering. That approach certainly isn’t viable for OnLive’s consumer plans because iPad owners aren’t going to buy a license to run a virtual copy of Windows on a service they may not keep using. Companies opting for OnLive’s expected business plans might be a different story but I’d doubt many businesses would want to do this either.

Feeling that headache now? Because the expensive bureaucracy gets worse.

Even with VDA licenses for each iPad (or each customer), Microsoft requires that each customer be connected to different physical hardware – meaning different servers and different storage devices. Then there are rules about whether users are connecting to a server at the same geographical location as they are, which can be mitigated in some ways by Extended Roaming Rights (ERR).

Enterprise virtualization guru Brian Madden has more details about Microsoft’s virtual desktop licensing issues but the gist is that Microsoft has created Windows licensing terms that make it next to impossible for companies to fully comply and offer a service like OnLive Desktop.

The big question is – what OnLive will do at this point? Microsoft seems to be saying that it will work with OnLive if the company is willing to pay to bring its service in line with the company’s licensing options but it’s hard to see what that might look like or if it would be viable. Of course, other companies have announced similar solutions to OnLive Desktop, which will likely be impacted by the outcome. So far, OnLive hasn’t commented on licensing or its situation with Microsoft.

One can’t help but wonder about Microsoft’s timing in going public about this issue. Could it be because Microsoft is expected to launch an iPad version of Office in the near future or because it sees options like OnLive Desktop as a threat to its upcoming Windows 8 tablets alongside of the first Windows 8 Consumer Preview?

  • Dilbert A

    Awesome title and the article nails it.

    Great job.

  • Adam Hartley

    More curious, is (besides for Flash) there is no sensible reason to want to run Windows on an IPad

  • morgan3nelson

    For many Enterprise IT groups – Microsofts draconian and misleading license practices are the catalyst for embracing Apple products – Keep it up Redmond!

    If only there was a TRUE Office alternative; iWorks is adequate, Google Docs and Open Office are passable, but nothing really replaces MS Office in the work place – yet.

  • Domnizkydesign

    Wait.

    I have Windows 7 running in Bootcamp on my MacBook Pro, which I virtually log into on my iPad or iPhone using ScreensConnect. It’s especially useful when I have to do big number-crunching crap that can’t be done on either device. Am I violating the User Agreement because Windows can’t run on iOS?

  • cottenhamr

    How is this Microsoft being greedy or at fault in any way?  They are 100% a software company.  They charge licensing fees to use their product.  Very simple to understand. 

    The person that wrote this article who has their head aching needs to take it out of their Apple loving butt.  Sorry, my house is FILLED with Apple products but if a company setup a remote version of Lion and let people use it for free Apple would have them shut down, not just ask for licensing fees.  They would be right to do so as well.

    Stop hating Microsoft so much that you think they should give their product away for free.

  • TheMacAdvocate

    The “timing” is what it is because Microsoft wanted to see OnLive Desktop launch and get paid subscribers before it dropped the hammer. If they squelched it before then, it wouldn’t have the chance to squeeze the company with whatever licensing agreement Microsoft ends up offering. Either that, or Microsoft was hilariously ignorant of OnLive’s offering before now, which seems unlikely, even for Microsoft.

  • cottenhamr

    Do you really believe that Microsoft knows of every pirated version of its software?  Not to mention if it was out of site and out of mind without anyone using it, how would they know it was there?  I love how the haters on this site rationalize things.  This has nothing to do with the name Microsoft and everything to do with protecting the product you sell. 

  • TheMacAdvocate

    When OnLive Desktop was released 3 months ago, it was accompanied by hundreds of tech news articles and reviews about the product – a product released by a company that wasn’t exactly anonymous before Desktop. Your failure to notice says more about your lack of awareness than it does about the stealthiness of the company.  

    Pirated software analogy FAIL. Try harder.

  • cottenhamr

     Does any of that matter? Really?  It is their product.  When they choose to enforce it is their choice.  Deal with it and quit hating a company and their products that you most likely use in some way.

  • TheMacAdvocate

    I don’t know where you’re getting the “hate” from. My point was that Microsoft knew about OnLive Desktop prior to their official statement about it. You seem to be the one who can’t “deal with” a simple statement about why the company would wait to call OnLive out, making some ridiculous comparison to pirated software.

  • tech_goop

    In my opinion and view of the virtualization landscape, 800 pound Microsoft gorilla is back with rock solid systems and strategy. The fact is that Microsoft has lots to offer in 2012 around literally everything, including but not limited to Hypervisors ( hosted virtual servers , Server 8 / Hyper-V, Native InfiniBand, etc.), VDI (Windows 8, hosted virtual desktops , Remote FX, RDP), Cloud Management (SCVMM), New storage protocols (SMB 2.2 w/CA, NDO & other features), VOIP soft phones (Lync, Skype), Pricing (SPLA, perpetual, it’s ALL good)

    So enjoy the show. 2012 is the year of Microsoft.

About the author

Ryan FaasRyan Faas is a technology journalist and consultant living in upstate New York who has written extensively about Apple, business and enterprise IT, and the mobile industry. In addition to writing for Cult of Mac, he is a contributor to Computerworld, InformIT, and Peachpit Press. In a previous existence he was a healthcare IT director as well as a systems and network administrator. Follow Ryan on Twitter and Google +

(sorry, you need Javascript to see this e-mail address)| Read more posts by .

Posted in News | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , |