Plight of Migrant Workers Blamed For Foxconn Suicides

Plight of Migrant Workers Blamed For Foxconn Suicides

The grieving family of a Foxconn worker who jumped to his death in January protest outside the factory.

The rash of suicides at Foxconn are not due to harsh working conditions but the plight of China’s migrant workforce, says an open letter signed by a dozen Chinese sociologists.

The letter blames the string of Foxconn suicides on the social problems faced by China’s vast class of migrant workers.

Originating from poor rural areas, Chinese migrant workers are often rootless and isolated, cut off from friends and family. Instead of finding good jobs in urban factories, they are often too poorly paid to settle in their new cities, and have limited access to education and healthcare. With no prospects at home, they are stuck. The sociologists call it the “path of no return.”

We have made them live a migrancy life that is rootless and helpless, where families are separated, parents have no one to support them, and children are not taken care of. In short, this is a life without dignity.

The sociologists note that at the end of 2008, the population of Shenzhen exceeded 12 million, but only 2.28 million were registered as permanent residents. The giant Foxconn plant, which employs upwards of 600,000 workers, is located in Shenzhen.

The sociologists call on Foxconn and the Chinese central government to boost wages, and improve access to housing, eduction and healthcare. They also say demand workers be given a “voice,” which presumably means unions.

We call on every enterprise, to make a conscientious effort to increase migrant workers‘ pay and rights, and allow migrant workers to become true “citizens of the enterprise”.

Here’s the full text of the open letter:

Appeal by Sociologists:
Address to the Problems of New Generations of Chinese Migrant Workers,
End to Foxconn Tragedy Now
社會學者的呼籲︰解決新生代農民工問題,杜絕富士康悲劇重演
18th May 2010
(original text in Chinese is posted online at http://tech.sina.com.cn/it/2010-05-19/13214206671.shtml; see also the blog at http://t.sina.com.cn/1743939945?retcode=0)

Since January of this year at the Foxconn Group, nine workers have already attempted suicide by jumping from buildings, resulting in the tragic death of seven, with two injured. Why would these young people, roughly all in their twenties, choose to leave this world in life’s most beautiful time? This loss of life is so distressing, and makes us think deeply about the new problems of the second generation of migrant workers and the status of China as the “world’s factory.”

Over the last thirty years, China has depended on huge numbers of cheap laborers, mainly from rural areas, who have forged an export-oriented style “world factory”, and fueled the rapid growth of China’s economy. But at the same time, the basic survival rights of the work force have been overlooked; we have denied migrant workers’ dignity, paid them at wage levels below the average for third world countries, made it impossible for them to settle and live in the cities, while leaving them to drift back and forth between cities and the countryside. We have made them live a migrancy life that is rootless and helpless, where families are separated, parents have no one to support them, and children are not taken care of. In short, this is a life without dignity. From the tragedies at Foxconn, we can hear the loud cries for life from the second generation of migrant workers, warning society to reconsider this development model that has sacrificed people’s fundamental dignity.

We call on the central government to immediately end the model of development that has sacrificed people’s basic dignity.

Some of our country’s industrial production now occupies a bigger and bigger market share in the low-end global production chains. We have noticed that, with the increase in GDP, there is also an expanding wealth gap and a drop in the price of labour, following the pressure to find jobs. We have also seen that laborers’ right to express their opinion has been constantly ignored.

The use of cheap labour to develop an export-oriented economy may have been a strategic choice for China in the first period of its reforms, given restrictions and capital deficiencies due to historical conditions. But this kind of development strategy has shown many shortcomings. Low wage growth of workers has depressed internal consumer demand and weakened the sustainable growth of China’s economy. The tragedies at Foxconn have further illustrated the difficulty, as far as labour is concerned, of continuing this kind of development model. Many second generation migrant workers, unlike their parents’ generation, have no thought of returning home to become peasants again. In this respect, they have started out on a road to the city from which they won’t return. When there is no possibility of finding work by which they can settle in the city, the meaning comes crashing down: the road ahead is blocked, the road back is already closed. The second generation of migrant workers are trapped. As far as dignity and identity are concerned, there is a grave crisis, from which has come a series of psychological and emotional problems. These are the deeper social and structural reasons we see behind the Foxconn workers who walk on the “path of no return”.

We think that development based on a strategy of “poor-human-rights competitiveness” is unsustainable. Today China’s capital is sufficient, the country’s national strength is powerful, and conditions and capacity exist to transform its development model. By relying on the common effort of the country, business, and workers, to conscientiously solve the problem of the second generation of migrant workers, surely it can effectively prevent this kind of tragedy from recurring.

DON'T MISS
Report: Foxconn Relocating Non-iPhone Workers

We call on every enterprise, to make a conscientious effort to increase migrant workers‘ pay and rights, and allow migrant workers to become true “citizens of the enterprise”.

Since 1988, when Foxconn founded a factory in Shenzhen, China, it has rapidly developed and expanded, with factories extending to the Pearl River Delta, Yangtze River Delta, the Bohai Sea region and the midwestern region. It employs more than 600,000 workers. Foxconn has become one of the world’s largest electronics manufacturers, a global final assembling-supplier which occupies the position of 109th in the world’s top 500 businesses. For 7 consecutive years it has ranked as the number one export corporation on China’s mainland. Foxconn’s situation today is inextricably linked to the blood and sweat of migrant workers. To serve as a business leader which stresses Corporate Social Responsibility, which claims to contribute to society, and value workers, Foxconn ought to pay laborers a dignified wage, provide basic material conditions for a normal, dignified life, and allow migrant workers to become true “citizens of the enterprise”.
We call for local government to protect migrant workers’ housing, education, medical care and other such social needs, to allow migrant workers to become true “citizens”.

Migrant workers’ pay and dignity are not limited to one enterprise, but are rather a universal problem in China. When migrant workers settle and live in cities, the biggest barriers they encounter are housing, their children’s education and healthcare and other such problems. We call on national and local government to take realistic measures which help migrant workers take root in cities, allow them to become true urban workers, and to share the fruits of the economic development they have personally created. Serving as an experimental zone for economic reforms, Shenzhen’s rise to prominence could not have occurred without the painstaking efforts of tens of millions of migrant workers. At the end of 2008, the actual population of Shenzhen city exceeded 12 million, but only 2.28 million were registered as permanent residents. It is migrant workers who made the major contribution to create the rich, strong and prosperous Shenzhen as it is today. As the beneficiaries of the reforms, the Shenzhen city government should improve migrant workers’ living conditions, and take concrete plans to solve migrant workers’ needs for housing, education, healthcare and so on. Shenzhen served as a leader since the 1980s in economic development, and should once again strive to serve as an example of social development and social fairness in the new century.

Finally, we call for the new generation of migrant workers to value their own lives, to value one another’s lives, to use positive methods to respond to the difficult position of laborers today, to strive for basic labour rights and interests, to protect themselves and their families’ rights to a decent life. Like brothers and sisters, unite and help each other, increase your ability to help yourselves when in danger, increase your self-preservation and self-management capability. And we call on all circles of society to work hard together, to participate in and promote the great endeavor of social progress, to build together a harmonious society that lets every laborer live with dignity.

Signed:
Shen Yuan, Professor – Tsinghua University, Sociology Department
Guo Yuhua, Professor – Tsinghua University, Sociology Department
Lu Huilin, Associate Professor – Beijing University, Sociology Department
Pun Ngai, Associate Professor – Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Applied Social Science Department
Dai Jianzhong, Research Fellow – Beijing Academy of Social Sciences
Tan Shen, Research Fellow – Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Sociology Department
Shen Hong, Research Fellow – Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Sociology Department
Ren Yan, Associate Professor – Sun Yat-sen University, Sociology Department
Zhang Dunfu, Professor – Shanghai University, Sociology Department

=======================
Translated by Kate Alexander
Edited by Ellen David Friedman

About the author

Leander Kahney

is the editor and publisher of Cult of Mac, and author of three books about technology culture: Inside Steve’s Brain, the New York Times bestseller about Steve Jobs; Cult of Mac; and Cult of iPod. Leander has written for Wired, MacWeek, Scientific American, and The Guardian in London. Follow Leander on Twitter @lkahney and Facebook.

(sorry, you need Javascript to see this e-mail address)| Read more posts by .

Posted in Apple, News, Top stories |

  • Macman

    ThAT is right, the migrant life is w/o dignity, therefore stop the f*** hell all multi-culturalism, and get back to basics( mainly in Europe), at all, utill is too late.

    (EU)

  • Paul

    People will migrate to where the work is. This is a fact of life!

    The whole point in manufacturing in China has been the cheap labor. Pay raises and unionization will lead to higher prices. At that point you might as well make the stuff here in the USA. Or how about building these factories in Mexico to alleviate the need for the sad and necessary migration of millions into this country.

    We’ve had our politicians and corporations sell out our jobs and factories to China for years now. All for a few dollars payoffs. We’re now paying the price. 10% unemployment is now the norm.

  • http://deoclicianocgiportfolio.wordpress.com Deocliciano Okssipin Vieira

    China would be a paradise for the Tea Party.
    The central government, the communist party close eyes as long there is profit.
    People are displaced in the name of development, Foxconn is just a tiny embarrassment for China.

    @Macman
    From a European, you ought to be Mad!
    Europe occupied and pillaged civilizations all over the world in the name of an imported religion, Christ followers.
    China itself is Multicultural and Europe is not a country, ever heard of Belgium or the Balkans ethnic backlashes?

    Is that what you mean with “back to basics”?

  • Mark

    I’ve never heard anyone talk about how China’s policy of one child per couple affects life there. Imagine a place no one has a brother, a sister, an aunt, an uncle, cousins, nephews, nieces. The most basic social unit, the family, has been gutted. No wonder they are prey to such isolation.

  • Dorothy

    I have been teaching in China for nearly four years and I agree whole-heartedly with the comments made in this article. It will be interesting to witness the impact of the current social status on China’s society in the next few years, including the over-indulged one child families. The social fabric is unraveling and I think China will ultimately pay a high price.

  • Ryan Thompson

    When the industrial revolution was occurring in England, this would have been considered a party. If you don’t like what’s going on where you are, you are always free to change it. If 400,00 of those 600,000 workers simply didn’t work next tuesday, things would change.

    However, it’s up to them to change it. People will die along the way, and that’s unfortunate. But people are dying all over the world, much more horribly, and for much less.

  • porkchop1234

    Finally some bloggers who have finally shown some heart and soul. I give full kudos to all of you and Leander for posting this article.

  • Macman

    @Vieira:

    Actually, the country where I come from, never did any kind of “War in the name of God” or so, that is why I don`t want pay the dues I didn`t make.

    I can see every day in every situations why this migrations aren`t good for anybody… Let stay every body at home, lets make a business between each other, and if you need asylum, ok no problem whit it. But at first, imagine all sates as the houses, and you would never lend your house to someone who would harm it or who would harm himself (in anyway) in your house.

    In EU, the states were for centuries separated, it is not like in USA, we have different traditions, different languages…we can be freind, but cannot be the one nation and one will, as well as we cannot forget our culture (unique in every single country) for the “guests that come out of nowhere” just because they want a better job… or better life.
    I know that this is different to discuss it there, but anyway time teaching us (in EU) that we went on a wrong path.

  • Optical

    Not diminishing the very real plight of the rural immigrant that finds him/herself trapped in a work/eat/sleep rut at de-humanizing megalopolises without any social support… but it seems to me a bit curious the publicity these sad incidents have garnered lately. Deplorable work conditions, worker casualties and industrial pollution health problems aren’t exactly a novel factor in China (or any other outsource-based industries all over the Third World), why the ample publicizing of this on the media, specially referring the company as an Apple manufacturer? Or have I answered my own question?

  • charli

    @optical. i think you answered the question yourself. A fair majority of the blogs picked up on this as a tool to Apple bash, basically putting the blame on the one company despite the fact that Foxconn does work for like 20 corporations and Apple might not even be the biggest.

    But to make lemonade at least the whole thing is getting some notice and enough hopefully that Foxconn will do something positive instead of falling back on ‘well it is still well below the national average’

  • http://deoclicianocgiportfolio.wordpress.com Deocliciano Okssipin Vieira

    @charli

    Like this Guardian article: How much do you really want an iPad? The west’s desire for gadgets comes at an inhumane cost in China
    The author wrote:
    … “Like good consumers, we obey too. Not that we should. It would be heartening if people could shake themselves and say that the iPad is just another computer, which we do not need and will not buy unless Apple persuades its suppliers to improve workers’ conditions. Until we do, the hypocrisy of the Chinese communists is our hypocrisy as well.”

  • http://VisionAndPsychosis.Net L K Tucker

    The comments in this thread argue the same point, harsh working conditions. The trouble is that is not what is causing the deaths. The designers of the factory put assembly line workers too close together. Why is that important?

    Forty years ago workers using the first prototypes of close spaced modern workstations began to have mental breaks. The cubicle was designed to deal with the vision startle reflex to stop the problem by 1968.

    Nothing Foxconn management has tried, raising wages, changing hours, or getting workers to sign a no suicide pledge has worked. There are now fourteen suicides.

    Across the Pacific 14 Ontario elementary schools have students experiencing racing hearts, headaches, memory loss and trouble sleeping. Pictures used by news sources to illustrate computer use in the schools show it’s the same problem as in the Foxconn factory, Subliminal Distraction. Children are shown crowded together, using laptops, sitting in each other’s peripheral vision, without Cubicle Level Protection. The students don’t have enough exposure to cause the full mental break.

    Until Foxconn fixes the design problem and explains to workers how to avoid exposure other places the suicides will continue.

    It remains to be seen if the Canadian school authorities will fix their problem before they kill one of the students.