Report: Google Suffering Microsoft-Like Headaches With Fragmented Android Platform
2:16 pm, November 17th, 2009, Leander Kahney
Uh, oh. Looks like there’s trouble in Android land. The rapid growth of Google’s smartphone OS is causing developers conniptions as they struggle to support multiple versions of the OS and different hardware configurations. With more than a dozen Android phones on the market, all the different configurations are leading to serious platform fragmentation, Wired.com reports:
“A slew of problems have made managing Android apps a “nightmare,” they say, including three versions of the OS (Android 1.5, 1.6 and 2.0), custom firmware on many phones, and hardware differences between different models.”
For users, it means buggy apps that sometimes won’t work on their hardware at all. One developer tells Wired.com that instead of concentrating on adding new features, he spends all his time making sure his apps work on all the different hardware and software configurations.
Looks like Google might be wandering into Microsoft territory. Microsoft had exactly the same problem with it’s now-discontinued “Plays For Sure” music-player platform, which became known as “Plays For Shit” because of the difficulty supporting multiple hardware and software configurations.
Just goes to show that there’s distinct advantages over owning both the hardware and the software, like Apple. Apple has released just three different hardware versions of the iPhone, and does a pretty good job of making sure most iPhone owners are running the latest software. In addition, the tightly-controlled App Store ensures a high-level of software compatibility. Even Android developers say its a good idea, according to Wired.com:
For developers, Apple’s autocratic ways may be frustrating, but they can pay off.
“Apple maintains an iron grip on what they do and there’s an advantage to that,” says Kelly Schrock, owner of Fognl, which has three apps on the Android market. “IPhone developers don’t have to worry about fragmentation and creating apps for the iPhone is much easier.”
Posted by Leander Kahney in News, iPhone | Comment on this article
Sort of similar to the articles on android vs iPhone from RoughlyDrafted Magazine.
Obama Pacman, on November 17th, 2009 at 2:54 pm
The exact reason why the OS-X desktop is so rock solid, total control has a good side for consumers.
Sadly the exact reason why Linux is taking so long to make any impact, fragmentation. You open the platform and people start forking it. Only when companies like RedHat, Novell and Oracle got hold of a version of a version of Linux and fixed it down that it started getting into server rooms. Linux will never make any serious dekstop penetration, too much fragmentation. Ubuntu is starting to some impact because they have started to follow a similar idea to iPhone Apps, Canonical have their own fixed and confirmed software repositories, which is starting to pay dividends.
Total control may seem draconian to some but Apple proves time and again, draconian control works to assure the consumers that the platform is safe and can be trusted.
Fuzzypig, on November 17th, 2009 at 4:00 pm
What Fuzzypig said.
CaryMG, on November 17th, 2009 at 4:20 pm
Suck it, haters!
MrCrispy, on November 17th, 2009 at 5:31 pm
Awwhhhh.., what’s a matter MrCrispy? YOu buy yourself a brick did ya?
Droidfail, on November 17th, 2009 at 7:10 pm
Apple is sending out talking points …. In the last few days I’ve seen this story in several forms … I like Apple , I own multiple Apple products but in general I have a dislike for PR weenies & bloggers trying to spin me.
Alex, on November 17th, 2009 at 8:40 pm
Uh.., I don’t think so Alex.
Ronni, on November 17th, 2009 at 9:37 pm
Droid = Broken (fragmented) Robot?
It didn’t take long at all.
Alexander, on November 18th, 2009 at 12:29 am
Now you see…this is why Apple is so strict about its app approval process for iPod/iPhone. All these developers are whining about the approval process taking too long…they’ll really be whining when nobody wants to buy their buggy apps for droid. Maybe droid needs an approval process like apple and these developers need to shut up and be happy for what they get!
Cody, on November 18th, 2009 at 1:29 am
>Now you see…this is why Apple is so strict about its app approval process
>for iPod/iPhone. All these developers are whining about the approval process
>taking too long…they’ll really be whining when nobody wants to buy their
>buggy apps for droid.
The double-edged sword goes two ways. Yes, the droid developers will be in HELL because of the app fragmentation, and the stupidity of developing for an infinite combination of discordant devices, some have physical keyboards, some don’t have physical keyboards, whatever. But what the droid developers hate (fragmentation due to choice) is exactly what their consumers crave (freedom of choice). So it’s not really a Lose-Lose situation. It’s more like a Lose-Win situation for Droid.
The reverse is true for Apple and iPhone’s tight integration. It’s a Win-Lose situation here. The developers “win” because they will appreciate the tight integration of hardware software. But the customers “lose” a little bit because they don’t have as much freedom of choice to choose a boatload of hardware.
Neither side is perfect. Neither side will ever be a Win-Win situation. Both have their pros and cons. I am Matilda the Fair. I call it like it is, bubba!
Matilda the Fair, on November 18th, 2009 at 4:08 am
“does a pretty good job of making sure most iPhone owners are running the latest software”
Didn’t a statistic come out a few months ago saying that only about 30% of people had updated to 3.0???
George, on November 18th, 2009 at 4:28 am
now you see why windoz is such an amazing accomplishment
ged, on November 18th, 2009 at 8:03 am
I predicted long ago that success would ruin android. No control of hardware equals pain.
tim rosencrans, on November 18th, 2009 at 4:34 pm
Man, I love iPhone and everything, but android seemed so promising! No slowdowns for app approval, etc… Google will figure this out some how, that’s why they live in the cloud! But it does show that Apple may have been smart to keep their hardware and software under their complete control.
Willie, on November 18th, 2009 at 5:31 pm