And The Winner Is… Best Music On-Demand Streaming Service

rsz_1best-music

In 2001, Apple changed the way music was distributed with the arrival of iTunes, its online digital media store. Since that time, the digital age has evolved rapidly into an era where cassette mix tapes and compact discs are no more. As we enter an era in which the internet serves our every need, alongside digital distribution and the iTunes Store are an increasing number of on-demand music streaming services have become today’s most popular and possibly cost-effective means of accessing the equivalent of walking into your local music store and buying everything.

Unlike Pandora and iTunes Radio (which we’ll cover shortly in another column), on-demand streaming radio allows you to listen to any music in the service library as often as you like.

The competition between the unlimited all-you-can-stream music services is fiercer than ever before, and with the launch of Beats Music this past month, it has become even more difficult to pinpoint the most suitable music subscription for our needs.

However, after hours of research, a comparison of the seven on-demand services on offer (including Beats Music, Spotify, Rdio, Xbox Music, Rhapsody, Sony Music Unlimited, and Google Play Music–see our table below), and some hands-on testing, we’ve managed to narrow down the overwhelming choice to a select few that offer the best overall features and usability. So let’s crack on with the results, shall we?

Comparing all on-demand streaming radio options.

Comparing all on-demand streaming music options.

THE WINNER – SPOTIFY

Best all-around user experience

It wasn’t too long ago when Spotify unlocked the ability to stream for free from mobile devices without paying for a subscription. Though you won’t get the full shebang, and it’s ad-supported with commercials, users can create playlists for free and play through them on a shuffle basis. The major drawback is the limit of only six skips per hour, which can be pretty restricting if you’re picky like myself. That said, it still means that if you’re a free subscriber you don’t have to commit to paying a single cent and can still enjoy the music you love on the go. Alternatively, if you’re an iPad user, the free ad-based version is flexible in that it allows you to play any song as much as you like. This could be a worthwhile compromise if you have an iPad and aren’t particularly fond of the shuffle mode aspect of the mobile version.

For $10 a month though, the Premium subscription of the Spotify service is absolutely worth it, especially if you enjoy music on the go with no limitations. Not only are there no ads or commercials to contend with, but the audio quality is considerably higher, there’s the option to download tracks to your device for offline playback (handy if you’re on the subway a lot), and there are no skip limits as well as full access to the mobile apps. Overall, the premium version is far more superior than the free one.

rsz_1rsz_1screenshot_2014-02-09_155505

Also worth noting is Spotify’s huge catalog of music, which boasts a whopping 24 million tracks. Included within that number are Spotify exclusives, such as the recent addition of a whole backlog of Led Zeppelin albums, unavailable anywhere else as of yet. Furthermore, even if you’re not a mobile or tablet user, the desktop app is still available to listen to as much music as you like for free.

Spotify has the highest amount of five star reviews currently on the App Store. Says iOS user Reacharounds of the premium subscription, “All your songs from when you were growing up, and all the current stuff. Loads of extra albums and live performance albums on here for all your favorite artists. Worth the [premium subscription.]”

Likewise, Spotify is very much a popular choice with Android’s Google Play users; the four and five star rated reviews collectively amounting to a higher total overall than the one to three star reviews combined. Most of the negative reviews relate to some of the stability issues, but this is mostly an Android-focused perspective, not of the service itself.

Reddit is one of the most popular sites for online debate and social discussion these days, and in a thread regarding on-demand music services, user SiriusCyberneticCorp states, “With Spotify, I feel like I get so much more than the music itself. Everything’s beautifully organized, the quality is universally high, the sharing facilities are actually well implemented rather than annoying – and it’s so simple to discover new music that matches one’s tastes.”

Spotify doesn’t come without issues, however, but most of these grievances are linked to the free version more than anything else. The lack of a repeat button can be somewhat frustrating for those who like to listen to a track more than once but this is only a small inconvenience. If you have a paid subscription, there’s nothing stopping you from searching for the track again. The free version is fairly restrictive with its mandatory shuffle system and limitations on skipping, but it’s also one of the only services which allows free users to sync their favorite tracks and listen to their music offline for as long as they like. It’s worth mentioning that if you’re not a regular Spotify listener, (and this accounts for the Premium subscribers too), the playlists or songs that have been synced to play offline can from time to time need to be synced again, even if you’re not in offline mode. There’s no explanation for this bug, which continues in the updated version of the app, but it’s not a huge issue and is easily worked around.

rsz_spotify_screenshot_2014-02-09_160652

Another more apparent downside is the recent confirmation that Chromecast users will indeed be able to access more music services by way of Rdio and Beats Music, who have both announced they are working with Google to enable support. Unfortunately, there’s still no word on whether Spotify will be joining this bandwagon, which is a slight disappointment for those who favor Spotify over the other music services.

It’s also recently just been announced that registered Last.fm users will be able to sync their profiles with their Spotify account, and vice-versa, if they are subscribed to both services. Last.fm’s recent partnership with Spotify gives Last.fm users access to its 20 million song library, but beneficial to Spotify subscribers is access to Last.fm’s 700 million streamable tracks, which boosts Spotify’s already growing library considerably. In a statement, Last.fm managing director Simon Moran said, “This collaboration with Spotify brings the together the best qualities of both services, creating a stronger listening and discovery experience for music lovers across the globe.”

More recently, within the last month, Spotify opened up a merchandizing feature to all artists across the UK and US, as well as in Ireland, Aus, NZ, Denmark, Sweden, Norway and Iceland. With plans to roll out this service elsewhere in the future, this could be yet another successful move for Spotify. With the ability for fans to buy any merchandise they wish from t-shirts and posters, to deluxe box-sets and vinyl, it remains without a doubt that Spotify will keep growing in popularity.

In relation to other similar apps and music streaming services, it may be a close call, but Spotify still reigns. Pandora remains a popular streaming app in the US, but it differs in a huge way from any on-demand music service. When comparing Spotify to Pandora and iTunes, creator Daniel Ek stated in an interview with Billboard that despite Pandora’s 76 million large user-base in the US, Spotify is not competing. “We want to be the place where you store and collect, where you build your playlist for your dinner party or your workout,” he said. “That is very different from Pandora.” iTunes on the other hand, was more of a rival since it allows users access to their own music. However, “the benefit of being on Spotify as opposed to iTunes is huge … it is so obvious that Spotify is much better because you can put more than 20 million songs in your pocket and access at any moment.”

Though the recent release of Beats Music caused some divergency in regards to opinion, there are many reasons to still make Spotify your number one service for on-demand music. Ellis Hamburger of The Verge says of Beats Music, “Downloading tracks for offline mode is speedy, but picking and playing tracks is noticeably slower than in an app like Spotify, which makes playback speed its top priority.”

For the perfect go-to app for all your listening music needs, Spotify still remains the number one choice.

Catalog: More than 20 million songs available globally.
Free streaming option: Yes! Unlimited with ads, in fact. Mobile platform offers shuffle option only.
Cost for unlimited use: $9.99 per month for all-device access without ads.
Number of subscribers: Paying: over 6 million; Active: over 24 million 

HONORABLE MENTIONS

RDIO

Spotify’s younger rival cuts it pretty close in terms of purpose and functionality, especially considering it hasn’t been around as long as its older, more superior cousin. Rdio’s smaller music library is just one reason that Spotify remains the popular choice, coming in at just over 20 million tracks compared to Spotify’s 24 million and counting. Catalog wise, there may be a couple of significant differences that give Rdio a slight edge; namely the broader range of diverse artists which in turn means Rdio may well be slightly more advanced in terms of music discovery. Rdio also has the advantage of being able to add music to a “collection,” rather than relying on a series of playlists. However, it’s heavy reliance on its integration with social media can be slightly off-putting, as it uses this method to be consistent with its recommendations.

Another factor that plays its part is audio quality. Many music lovers will expect a certain quality when paying for a music streaming service, and Rdio’s measly 192kbps is a slight disappointment compared to the more acceptable 320kbps offered by other music streaming services.

Desktop applications are also important when it comes to narrowing a decision down, and Rdio’s desktop app is a little diluted compared to the faster, more responsive desktop app offered by Spotify. Disappointingly, it doesn’t offer more than basic functionality, so there’s no definitive reason  just yet to use this over the web player in your browser.

rsz_screenshot_2014-02-09_152905

Rdio may well be the lesser-known service, but its competitive prices can certainly overshadow most alternatives, which is also a reason that it comes in a close runner up. If you’re based in the US, there’s a huge 50% discount for those who sign up as a student or to the family plan. The discount also applies to web only listeners, who can stream from their computers at a reasonable price of $4.99.

Catalog: 20 million songs.
Free streaming option: Free and unlimited with ads.
Cost for unlimited use: $9.99per month for all-device access without ads.
Subscription base: Undisclosed, but Rdio says that 90 Percent of its subscribers are on its $9.99 unlimited streaming plan.

BEATS MUSIC

The recently launched Beats Music has a lot of heart, but with so many other alternative and popular music subscription services, it’s hard to pinpoint exactly what it has to offer that the others don’t already.

It’s unique user experience, playful interface and interesting approach to music discovery definitely offer something different, but at the same time is altogether a little too random in some respects. Upon launching the app, you’ll go through a get-to-know you sequence in which you’re able to pick a few genres and artists that are to your liking. It’s a great idea, but the choices are fairly lacking, and since it uses this information to recommend albums “Just For You” then it may not be as tailored to your tastes as you want. Another section for recommendations, “The Sentence”, presents you with a sentence in which you fill in the blanks selecting from a series of words. Although a playful and fun take on discovering new music, it can be a little hit-or-miss in terms of the outcomes it suggests.

rsz_beats-music-ios-app-screenshots

If you’re looking for personalization and curation, Beats Music certainly triumphs above all of the others in this respect, and its vibrant, sleek interface stands out beautifully amongst the crowd. That said, the lack of a desktop version and a limited number of platforms to experience Beats Music upon means it falls quite far behind in terms of usability. Add to this the fact that Beats Music hasn’t been around all that long, the lack of a free version, and that it’s currently only available in the US, and it’s obvious that Beats Music is the inferior choice as it stands currently.

That’s not to say it doesn’t have its benefits though, and for those who love a truly personalized experience with its own series of characteristics, it’s definitely worth checking it out.

Catalog: More than 20 million songs.
Free streaming option: Seven-day trial.
Cost for unlimited use: $9.99 per month or a five-person family plan through AT&T for $14.99 a month.
Subscription base: Too early to tell. Beats are hoping MOG subscribers will transfer to their service when the MOG service closes down (April 15th).

 ROUND UP

  • Spotify: International availability, all round best user experience, best audio quality, biggest song catalog.
  • Rdio: More exclusive rights with certain artists, sound quality isn’t the best.
  • Beats Music:  Best for playlist and music discovery, great sound quality.

Ultimately the final decision is down to personal choice and circumstance, but each of the above music services all have their own free trials (though Beats Music limits its trial to seven days). For usability and the biggest music catalog, Spotify is your best bet, but if you’re personally not fussed about audio quality and like discovering a whole range of artists, Rdio may well be the one for you. Unfortunately it’s early to say whether Beats Music is in line for the throne considering how new a service it is but it definitely wins in terms of creativity.

Obviously the best plan of action is to trial each one for a significant amount of time and see if it manages to meet your needs, but if the services above don’t tickle your fancy, then there are a couple of alternatives that just about made it into our top five.

ALTERNATIVE SERVICES

RHAPSODY
Catalog: 16 million songs
Free streaming option: No (30 day trial)
Cost for unlimited use: $9.99 a month Premier Plan, $14.99 a month Premier Plus
Subscription base: 1 million

XBOX MUSIC
Catalog:
30 million songs
Free streaming option: Yes, web-based, with ads
Cost for unlimited use: $9.99 Premium ad-free service
Subscription base: Undisclosed

  • http://www.sk1wbw.wordpress.com/ Wayne Williams

    I’ll stick with iTunes Radio and Radium. I just can’t see spending a monthly fee to listen to music. We have Sirius in the truck which is well worth it.

    • David Marshall

      Sirius is turning into a waste of money because of its repetitive song play on every station.

      • Littlefoot Longstroke

        Agreed. Sirius is dying a slow death. The only reason it’s still alive is because data is more expensive and not everyone has a smartphone. Once these streaming music services become more integrated in automobiles, there will be no use for satellite or terrestrial radio. Upping your cell phone data plan will make more sense.

  • Joshua D.

    this is dumb, I had spotify its selection is limited and you can’t listen to your own purchased music in addition to what is offered, now I am a Android user and when I did have a iphone 5 spotify was the best choice, but if your going to include every platform Google Play Music All Access beats the pants off of all of these

    I switched from Spotify to Google Play Music All Access, its 10x better than itunes or spotify combined, it had a way bigger selection than spotify. Also this article is wrong about google play Music All Access, you can download a desktop app for both Mac OSX and Windows for your desktop as well as sync all your itunes music wirelessly to any android device strait into the play music app.

    • Mahdeen Vakhshoor

      Very true.

      Another point that this article fails to consider is the number of connected devices to the service which is important in my opinion. I’ve tried both Deezer and Spotify but now with G play music which permits 10 devices, all phones of family, tablets, Desktops and HTPC use the service.

  • Jarret Pesola

    Why wasn’t Slacker Radio included in this?

  • Brandon

    There is *no* audible difference between 192kbps and 320kbps. If you think there may be, put yourself to a double blind ABX test!

    [edit] I’m tired of reading authors who claim there’s a quality issue here without any attempt to substantiate the claim. There is none. The average listener in the average environment will not hear any difference above 96kbps for AAC, at the highest. Even trained ears listening on the best equipment (how much did you pay for those headphones?) are unlikely to hear a difference above 192kbps, on most material, based on my own testing and the reports of others I’ve read.

    • Mark Langston

      THANK YOU!!! I can tell you from practical experience that between Spotify, Rdio and Beats Music that there is absolutely no difference in quality.

      I know this because I subscribed to all 3 services for a month just to test them all out and found that they all sounded great. Actually Beats Music let me down more often than the other two.

      I consume most of my streaming music in the car which means driving randomly through 4G and LTE zones. For whatever reason Beats Music would decrease in volume by what feels/sounds like a 30% reduction. The quality was still there, it just sounded muted or like I turned my down volume.

      With Rdio or Spotify the volume level was always the same. Whether I could connect if I passed into a Edge network zone is a different matter but that’s to be expected.

    • mathieulefrancois

      Depends on how you listen. If you use high end headphones you will notice the difference. (but to be fair someone with high end headphones probably won’t be streaming anyway)

    • Guest

      If you listen with mediocre, if your gear sucks, you will hear no difference…and I took that challenge 3 years ago. I can hear the difference between flac and 320. Please don’t speak on matters you know nothing about.

    • Brian Lewis

      If your gear is crap to mediocre quality, then no, you will not hear a difference. I took the challenge 3 years ago and scored 10/10 a/bing flac and 320 files. Please know what the hell you are talking about before typing. It makes you look like an idiot.

  • http://pixelworxfactory.com KevinH

    I think if you considered Spotify’s user interface design (which matters to me since I am a UI designer) in this comparison, it would lose. It’s just a mess and outdated. That’s why I use Rdio. Rdio’s mobile app rocks as well.

  • http://twitter.com/gettysburg11s gettysburg11s

    I agree, Spotify is the best if you want total control over your streaming music, and you don’t mind the ten dollar a month fee. However, if that’s too much, I’d recommend Pandora One, which I use. Its a more random way to listen to artists you like, but the cost is much less too, at $3.99 a month (with no Ads).

  • dd0723

    I think this article might be a bit biased. Is this the author’s personal experience? How did he arrive at the fact that Spotify is the winner? (far from it). Is this perhaps a paid advertising article? There’s no way in hell Spotify is the winner when there’s clearly many easier to use applications out there than Spotify. I’ve tried to give it a chance multiple times but the ease of use and the GUI is a clusterfuck of insanity. I just want to turn on and go. Not have to mess around with settings or importing or this or that. Pandora and iTunes radio for me is the perfect way to go.
    Rdio is great but where’s slacker radio?. I’ll take this review with a grain of salt.

    • Rob LeFebvre

      Check the comparison chart – the “winning” features are highlighted in red. Also read the quotes from other reviewers. This is not a paid post.

  • mepex

    The fact that you can’t listen to your own mp3s using Rdio is a killer for me. Many major bands are still not available on the streaming services (Zeppelin, Beatles, Tool, AC/DC, etc), and not being able to supplement the streams with your own files is a terrible oversight in my opinion.

  • http://www.pro-tools-expert.com/ Russ Hughes

    This story runs on the day that the idea of a Spotify IPO is mooted… coincidence?

  • Falafelhead

    Long time Rdio fanatic who recently switched to Spotify.
    Everything in this article is right on.
    But I always contend with people who say Rdio has the “social media integration”
    Rdio has a solid community, but it’s not YOUR social one.
    Whereas Spotify reminded me of an Instagram. When you connect it to Facebook, you realize EVERYONE is already here. It really makes listening/finding new music more fun…thus my switch.

    Just my two cents. Otherwise again, great comparison.

    • Joseph Seboek

      I was on Spotify for about a year, then moved to Rdio. Since the redesign of Spotify it is faster and more reliable than Rdio. I also like the social aspect as you mentioned and again the speed. Streaming is like INSTANT!

  • Kevin Burton

    These music streaming service comparison articles are a dime a dozen. *yawn* The bias towards Spotify and whatever new service just came on-board is unbelievable. Dinging a service for having 192 kbps bitrate instead of 320 kbps is pointless. Calling Spotify an “older, more superior cousin” to Rdio is bulls**t. I was using Rdio for a good year or more before Spotify hit the US. Do more homework, author. You clearly didn’t actually trial all of the services in your article. You regurgitated what others have already said.

  • Mark Langston

    Actually Beats Music is losing music. I’ve been testing out the service for the past few weeks against Rdio (I had Spotify but the interface’s on the iPhone, iPad and desktop player are disparate and butt ugly) and found that several albums and tracks had suddenly become unplayable.

    Not the popular stuff like Rihanna or Imagine Dragons but niche songs and albums that have become personal anthems for me — J.Rawls Presents The Liquid Crystal Project 2 come to mind — were suddenly gone. I’m also a fan of Tori Kelly but discovered that one of her EP’s was grayed out. There was also a few obscure electronic/downtempo tracks that I really enjoy that are gone too (a couple of Eddy Meets Yannah tracks and albums).

    This review didn’t touch on Rdio’s apps and the synergy between them. Playing a song through the web interface is controllable through the iPhone or iPad app and vice versa. The interface also keeps track of what you were listening to so if you started a song on your smartphone you could it pick up on the desktop (again, vice versa).

    As for the interface itself it towers over them all. My only criticism, now that Beats is on the scene, is that the controls and sidebar text is way, WAY too small. My hope is that at some point they’ll address that but as of today I think Rdio offers the best value.

    • nobjizzer

      deezer, anybody? If you’ve never used deezer you are all a bunch of fossils! dunno maybe us poms are lucky and its only available here in the u.k.
      seriously though go check out deezer, some mobile phone companies offer it together with part of your phone contract. ;-)

  • Philly Ciz

    This article was beyond biased but what would one expect from a site dedicated to worshiping Apple. Google music has apps for ios and android but it also works on mac and linux and windows in your browser. The only place I have ever seen anyone have issues accessing it is (drumroll please) an iPhone, with its lack of flexibility and flash lol. See it integrates with your gmail, the same way google voice, youtube, etc do. The combination of their digital locker, which I store 20,000 songs of my own from my itunes and their all-access which includes specialized reviews, suggestions etc is right up there with Spotify. My only issue is the ability to share what you play with people on social networks other than G plus. Spotify may be the best streaming service by a small bit, but Google has achieved what Spotify has and beaten out Amazon and their digital locker service. You didn’t even mention Google Music after the chart. Beats Music looks cool but it tries to sell you AT&T and the music it supposedly chooses for you from the word choices are often far from what I was looking for. Great idea but at this point it is unproven. I mean come on Lucy. did you type this on your macbook while listening to your itunes on your iphone while doodling on your ipad while watching Apple TV? Thank god Apple’s attempt at a streaming service has failed thus far. If anyone wants the best experience. Spotify and Google Music are it. Let’s be honest, you ignored Google Music beyond the chart on purpose even though the chart clearly shows it being as good or better than every other service. They let anyone right columns these days.

  • Samuel Holliday Nelson

    Everyone keeps ragging on Spotify for having a bad GUI, but this is demonstrably not the case. Take these steps to see why I’m right.

    1. Open Spotify.
    2. Search for a song, then play it.

    Now let’s reflect. Did you have trouble with this? If so, then you’re an incompetent geriatric completely unsuited to life in this millennium. If this isn’t the case, then you may have some serious developmental issues to come to terms with.

    • http://troybetz.com troybetz

      You can’t judge an entire UI based off one action. If I were to use these media services for simply searching songs and playing them, I would use Soundcloud or Youtube.

    • DFW Heathen

      I agree. I don’t see what is so difficult about the Spotify UI. If that is really the best reason for not using it then maybe they need to try a Fisher Price version.

    • Rudy777King

      If something is very popular, like Tesla or Spotify, competing companies start to attack mainly via social media with fake profiles. If spotify is really so bad why it has the most subscribers ? This is the right question we have to ask.

    • Joseph Seboek

      Are we even talking about the new UI for Android that launched in May. It’s awesome! I am sure iOS is good as well. I am doing a trial with Google All Access, yet was surprised to see the lack of depth in their music library. Talking mainstream music where compared to Spotify, albums per artist are like 2:1. Deal breaker. Liked everything else about the service. Again, really surprised Google does not have a bigger library.

    • Warren Lauzon

      Spotify also has an excellent ROKU app – I think it is the only streaming service that has the ROKU app.

  • ejdeleon

    I did a 7-day trail with Beats Music and wasn’t impressed but I have AT&T and would like to know the advantages of having Beats Music with AT&T. I’m doing a 30-day trial with Spotify and very impressed so far. But I’m wondering if or when iTunes will unleash their on-demand service? Anyone have an idea?

  • William

    Sony Music Unlimited!!!!!!! iPhone (4s or 5) 9.99 for every Playstation device you own. (PS3/Ps4/Psvita/iPhone/android) I have an iPhone and my gf had an Android phone we both share my sony entertainment account which I have no problem downloading songs for offline playback as well as streaming songs during gameplay. Xbox …… Lmao. Not competing with Microsoft, Sony offers the ability to post what you’re listening to your Facebook via ps system. (Kicking ex-boxers asses)

    • Nathan Johnson

      The Xbox Music system is great for those of us who have mostly Windows devices… Same price as the Sony offering with access across all your Xbox devices, mobiles (WP8, iOS & Android), offline playback & streaming during whatever else it is you’re doing. Can also be accessed anywhere via web interface.

      Really, all the offerings are comparable, they don’t truly kick each other’s arse. They’re just better suited to each companies’ products and to different users’ needs. Have Apple everything? Get Spotify/Rdio/etc. Have a PS3/4? Get Sony. Similar deal if you have a XB360/One or Windows Phone – get an Xbox Music Pass.

      At least Xbox allows free web based listening with unlimited skips, song changes, etc. This is far more useful than features that allow you to annoy others by telling them that you are listening to a certain song on Facebook… I mean, really, who cares what music you like? If you want to tell everyone that badly, just make a damn status, it’s not that hard!

  • Jimmy James

    Google Play Music has a massive collection and 320kbps music, for those of us who came upon this article and do not have an iPhone or Mac.

    • Joseph Seboek

      Trying out Google All Access. Library is surprising limited compared to Spotify. I was surprised! Talking main stream artists, where Spotify will have a collection of ten albums from an artist and All Access has about half that! What? Liked everything else, but a deal breaker if the library is not up to snuff.

      • Jimmy James

        I found Spotify did not have releases from the past two years from a few artists I like, but Google did. That is the problem with all of theses services. Some have some others don’t. If you want selection, Rhapsody is the King of Kings with 24 million tracks and have been around the longest. The only drawback is they stream/download at 192kbps. They also have writers who suggest music and the best suggested playlist selection of new or old music. For whatever reason, people always want to try new services, instead of sticking with the best and the originators, including myself. “Rhapsody was the first streaming on-demand music subscription service to offer unlimited access to a large library of digital music for a flat monthly fee”, but people laughed at renting music, now everyone thinks it is cool. Yahoo! even had a service before all of these newbies. I will be going back to Rhapsody, after I try Sony’s, which is also supposed to have 20 million tracks and great quality. Rdio is severely lacking in tracks, but a really simple to use interface. I was going to try Beats, but now that Apple owns it, um no.

      • Joseph Seboek

        Jimmy, I found there is the publicized songs list (20+ Million) or whatever, and then in practicality, when I go looking for music and it is either there or not. I was using Rdio prior, but the app is too buggy and slow. For most any given artist I found the number of new and old albums per artist to be about the same with both services. No so with Google All Access. Again very surprised. Have not tried Rhapsody. 192kbps and up, most people won’t even know the difference. Also, tried Beats pre-fruit company. Very limited. Spotify’s new app is pretty good with the ability to view collections by artist, album or play list. Music library seems robust too. They just need to get off the dime when it comes to user requests like being able to organize the songs on a play list on the Android app. This request has been around for like 2 years! Hello? Basic element of a music player. Where, Google Access really shines is the simplicity of design, search, add, download all in one place with the ability to sort music by artist, album or genre! The big plus is the user can upload their own music (say that rare album they have on CD) and have it available just like the streaming or downloaded music. That’s really compelling! Music player is a tad slower than Spotify and as mentioned library depth seems limited to me.

      • Warren Lauzon

        Spotify seems to have a much better foreign language selection than any other service, especially from the Asian region.

    • Warren Lauzon

      And though it may have changed, previously when I used the Apple app it would not work on all devices. Even some of the purchased music was “device bound”.

  • David Marshall

    This article is bullocks! First off Deezer has destroyed Spotify in app design and web use. Rdio has some great layouts in their app but it does have some flaws when making playlists and such making it cumbersome. Google Play isn’t perfect but has become my favorite over all others because it just works and does so every-time no issues. You can upload missing content from artists catalogs it sounds great and the app has a good fairly simple layout. The other top notch feature of Google Music Unlimited is that when you upload your own content it is implemented and looks as if it belongs. You see the album art and it catalogs with the content available from Google Music in the library. When it comes to song choice it’s stocked just as much as the others. Deezer sometimes has something Google is missing but the same is true of Google Music Unlimited.

    If you want the best of all worlds go with Google but don’t leave Deezer out in the cold it is a solid service. Deezer lacks a bit in the layout and usability area. The customer service from both have been excellent. I-Tunes doesn’t compete with either of these services and the “radio” styled services are all a waste of money when you can use Songza for free which is better and more adept at giving the listener what it wants for free.

    • Matthew Wass

      Personally i go the Music Unlimited route, 4.99/month is nothing i piss that much out before i even fully wake up in the morning..

      i can access it from every product i own, ps4,vita,pc, mobile (even tho it says the 9.99 gives mobile/tablet support, im still able to stream to them at the 4.99 version for some reason) yet to find a song i cant find on the service, no issues, no problems, works great.

      Its all about the ecosystem your in.. itunes ppl will stick with there iphone way, android has there goto choice, its all about preference.. not one service is the best.. they all have faults.

      im in all 3 ecos, Dedicated Playstation, Dedicated to Windows 8.1 phone (easily becoming better then ios/android with monthly updates) and then i have android tablet for the other crap.

      Music unlimited works on everything (so does the others im sure) which is my point.. theres no difference..

  • http://ks2problema.wordpress.com/ KS2 Problema

    Google’s All Access is ALL 320 kbps.

    I suspect it was listed as ‘up to 320′ because the free Google ‘music locker’ component allows users to upload their own lesser bitrate files — but that was INACCURATE — since it ALSO allows users to upload full quality, lossless FLAC files which can then be streamed to logged in desktop browsers or one’s mobile devices.

    After having used SIX paid on demand services over the last ten years, I’ve settled on Google’s All Access add on to the free Google Music — primarily because of its powerful (if quirky) user interface — but also because they are among the services that pay the highest royalties to artists — about six times what Spotify pays. Runner up was Spotify (aside from the royalty thing which is important to me as a musician and songwriter but perhaps less so to others) .

    I also have been on MusicMatch On Demand,* Yahoo Music Unlimited,* Rhapsody, MOG,* and Beats.

    *These three services were ALL dismantled and mothballed under Beats Music’s current head, Ian C. Rogers — he’s a GIANT in the streaming industry.

    At least as far as putting subscription stream services IN THE GROUND.

    • Warren Lauzon

      The Google app has turned out better than I thought it would. The only reason I have not gotten a paid sub is that it does not have a ROKU app – which Spotify does.

  • JS Newton

    The author claims that Spotify has “20 milliion+ songs globally”, this is pure marketing BS, that unfortunately gets repeated without critical consideration.

    The true meaning of this is that if you add together the size of all the music catalogs (number of songs) availabe in each market, it totals 20 million. However, there is much duplication in counting the same or similar catalogs as something to add together, and of course no one user has a choice of 20 million songs.

    It is really an abuse of the language to suggest 20 million songs available, it would be like suggesting that a chain store (Home Depot? Safeway?) has xxx million products available if you add the number of products (SKU’s) for each store together.

    • http://karmamule.wordpress.com Eddie Yasi

      I’ve seen people talk about that number varying *by market*, meaning it is not a summation of the various markets but actual song count per market. For example I remember when Spotify first launched in the US our library selection was several million less than Europe’s. That also doesn’t make sense because rival services that initially started in one market, e.g. Beats, quoted libraries of the same size as Spotify’s. If Spotify were mutliplying by market then their library should have been WAY bigger than these other services, but its not.

      When rdio, whose library is close to the same size as Spotify’s, launched in new markets their library size didn’t suddenly double or triple, it stayed the same, so clearly they also are not doing that practice, and since their numbers are close to Spotify’s it doesn’t seem Spotify is counting multiples like that either.

      So, I don’t think it works how you are saying. Where did you see that the total song selection is counting the same song multiple times? Did you see some source saying that’s how it works?

    • Warren Lauzon

      All the music services are the same in that respect. If the same track appears on 50 albums, it is counted 50 times. And not all songs are licensed in all countries – I read someplace that France is one of the worst for streaming music, so it is probably a lot less in some regions. In the US I have noticed that some Chinese language songs are not available in the US.

About the author

Lucy IngramUK based freelance writer from the South of England, Lucy Ingram contributes to CultofMac by advising iOS users of some of the leading apps on the App Store today. She has contributed to various tech, gaming and iOS sites, including 148apps, TouchArcade and GameSpot. You can contact her directly on Twitter @pixelartjunkie.

(sorry, you need Javascript to see this e-mail address)| Read more posts by .

Posted in News | Tagged: , , , , |