Spot The Difference: Nottingham Clones Notational Velocity
7:12 am, January 12th, 2010, Giles Turnbull

Left: Notational Velocity, right: Nottingham
Tyler Hall, the developer behind Nottingham is quite clear: he loved Notational Velocity so much, he wanted to make a version of his own.
He makes it very plain right here:
“I didn’t start out to write an app like NV, I started out with the intention of literally copying what they had created and then improving upon it.”
Some of you Notational devotees out there might argue that the original needs no improvement, but wait: Tyler has some good ideas.
He’s changed the look of the notes and the search wrapper, because he thinks Notational Velocity is “ugly” (I disagree). But he’s also added support for synching notes with the Simplenote web service and associated iPhone app. Suddenly, Nottingham looks a lot more interesting.
For those who haven’t seen Simplenote before, it too was partly inspired by the beauty and simplicity of Notational Velocity. It syncs notes between mobile and desktop in a completely hassle-free manner, and is a much better solution to mobile notes than Apple’s own built-in Notes app, despite its own sync-with-Mail feature.
Nottingham (+10 points for the name) might not offer much that Notational doesn’t already; Tyler says he’s added rich text support and a “Date Modified” column, but both of those are already built in to my copy of NV. The web preview is new and can cope with notes written in Markdown, which might come in handy.
But it’s that Simplenote feature that’s the story here, and what makes Tyler’s clone a very tempting purchase at just 15 dollars.
Over to you, notepad fans. Would you stick with NV, switch to Nottingham, or perhaps use both?
Posted by Giles Turnbull in News, Reviews, Software, Top stories | Comment on this article
If you enjoyed this article:
Subscribe via RSS or email, or follow us on Facebook and Twitter













NV syncs to the iPhone already via WriteRoom and SimpleText as I described here…
http://dougist.com/?p=735
Having tried both, I think the WriteRoom – NV combination is certainly equivalent, and may be more elegant than the Simplenote solution. Simplenote is a nice application, but WriteRoom for the iPhone is a minimalists dream
Doug
http://www.dougist.com
Doug, on January 12th, 2010 at 10:07 am
Fortunately Notational Velocity’s features aren’t set in stone — Cloudfactory themselves, makers of Simplenote, already announced that Notational Velocity would soon have Simplenote syncing:
http://simplenoteapp.com/news/2009/11/16/our-new-web-app-and-an-exciting-partnership.html
So it looks like the choice is moot.
Toenails, on January 12th, 2010 at 11:18 am
Nottingham still has a ways to go, but it certainly has some potential. Likewise if NV just modernized the interface and synced with SS it would probably still win out due to it being free and having more intuitive keyboard behaviors. Which is very likely to happen as you well know if you read the link by Toenails up there.
So Nottingham has a great position at the moment, but needs to make it’s next moves carefully while continuing to polish off the rough edges..
Anonymous, on January 13th, 2010 at 11:44 pm
Well, looks like that’s that.
http://scrod.posterous.com/interesting-facts-about-simplenote-support-in
Toenails, on January 31st, 2010 at 5:15 am
The new version of Notational Velocity syncs to iPhone. Its interface looks better than Nottingham and it has a superior icon.
William T, on February 2nd, 2010 at 3:35 am