Top stories

Journalists Cover Microsoft, Using Macs

It’s not an easy time for Microsoft — with Steve Ballmer having to field questions about being “buffoons” and an “evil empire”  at the shareholder’s meeting (.doc) — so when they get together “the world’s most influential technology pundits and online writers” (nb: we weren’t invited) for Mobius to discuss super-secret mobile tech you’d think [...]

Guide To Black Friday Apple Bargains: Cheap MacBooks, iPods and Accessories Galore

Here’s a guide for finding the best bargains on Apple-related gear during the infamous Black Friday sales on November 27. We’ve compiled a comprehensive list of gear from leaked photos of sales flyers and descriptions of sales.
The bargains include a 2.26 GHz MacBook + $150 gift card at Best Buy for $999.99 ; a 32GB [...]

Review: Voices Is Today’s Best Thing Ever, Grab It Now While It’s Cheap

New on the App Store is Voices from the clever folk at Tap Tap Tap. You can guess what it does.

Open it up, pick a silly voice. Helium is pretty silly. A microphone appears and the app even clears your throat for you (try it, you’ll see what I mean). Now speak your brains, and [...]

Review: Sony Walkman S540 Series Video MP3 Player

Press releases, you will hardly be surprised to hear, are rarely very interesting. But one arrived in my inbox a couple of weeks ago that made me double-take.
“Sony’s S Series Walkman,” it chattered, “is a serious challenger to the iPod Nano.” Gosh, really? Perhaps the Cult had better have a look at one, then, despite [...]

Psystar Tells Court, “We bought the software!”

Psystar has raised another desperate, if novel claim in its ongoing legal battle with Apple, arguing before a federal judge that since the Mac clone-maker legally purchased its copies of Mac OS X from Apple and resellers, it has the right to do basically whatever it wants with that software under the first-sale doctrine.

In court filings described by Computerworld, Psystar told the court: “Once a copyright owner consents to the sale of particular copies of a work, the owner may not thereafter exercise distribution rights with respect to those copies. See, e.g., Bobbs-Merrill Co. v. Straus, 210 U.S. 339, 350-51 (1908) (recognizing more than 100 years ago the concept of first sale and the limitations imposed upon a copyright owner in light thereof). Psystar acquired lawful copies of the Mac OS from Apple; those copies were lawfully acquired from authorized distributors including some directly from Apple; Psystar paid good and valuable consideration for those copies; Psystar disposed of those lawfully acquired copies to third-parties.”

Unfortunately for Psystar, courts have rarely held the first sale doctrine applies to software, considering it a product that is licensed, not sold, and can therefore be distributed with restrictions on further distribution. Psystar’s thin hopes likely hang on the precedent of a case involving Adobe, in which a court upheld the first sale doctrine’s application to software.

Via Cnet

About the author

Lonnie Lazar

Lonnie Lazar is a writer, musician, web designer attorney. He writes about Apple for Cult of Mac and Mac|Life, and about VoIP and telecommunications for Voxilla. Follow Lonnie on Twitter @LonnieLazar, join the Cult of Mac on Facebook, and find Lonnie's photos on Flickr.

Email the author | Read more posts by Lonnie Lazar.

7 comments

    trouble here is that Psystar hacked the software to make it work on their machines, in violation of Apple’s court confirmed rights to tie hardware and software together. doing this they basically created a new software, which plagarizes on the non open source portions of Apple’s Mac OS.

    and that’s not excused by the right of first sale.

    It’s brilliant, but…

    If the trick works this time for Pystar, Apple simply stops selling the software — DVDs in stores.

    Then it only comes on Apple machines, or downloaded updates from Apple. Like on the iPhone.

    Also as I understand it, box copies of OSX are all technically UPGRADE licenses so Psystar isn’t really compensating Apple for the FULL license price (which is theoretically bundled with the purchase of every Mac). The other posts make good points as well.

    I want to know who’s funding their lawyers to keep up this fight. It’s obviously pointless and senseless, and they’re wasting time trying to find a legal loophole that will allow them to continue to exist.

    Its like they are just throwing crap at the wall and hoping that something will stick.

    My guess is that these guys are either trust fund babies on a rather pointless mission or they are being funded by someone big who has a vested interest in cracking open Apple’s licensing agreements. I guarantee if its the later it will eventually come out and Apple will unleash the hounds.

    [...] Via: You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Related Posts: Mac world 2009: New Mac book Pro After a rather boring lecture about hardware is concerned, Phil finished with a classic “and one mo [...]

Buy Inside Steve's Brain Buy from Amazon.com Buy from Barnes & Noble