Top stories

Journalists Cover Microsoft, Using Macs

It’s not an easy time for Microsoft — with Steve Ballmer having to field questions about being “buffoons” and an “evil empire”  at the shareholder’s meeting (.doc) — so when they get together “the world’s most influential technology pundits and online writers” (nb: we weren’t invited) for Mobius to discuss super-secret mobile tech you’d think [...]

Guide To Black Friday Apple Bargains: Cheap MacBooks, iPods and Accessories Galore

Here’s a guide for finding the best bargains on Apple-related gear during the infamous Black Friday sales on November 27. We’ve compiled a comprehensive list of gear from leaked photos of sales flyers and descriptions of sales.
The bargains include a 2.26 GHz MacBook + $150 gift card at Best Buy for $999.99 ; a 32GB [...]

Review: Voices Is Today’s Best Thing Ever, Grab It Now While It’s Cheap

New on the App Store is Voices from the clever folk at Tap Tap Tap. You can guess what it does.

Open it up, pick a silly voice. Helium is pretty silly. A microphone appears and the app even clears your throat for you (try it, you’ll see what I mean). Now speak your brains, and [...]

Review: Sony Walkman S540 Series Video MP3 Player

Press releases, you will hardly be surprised to hear, are rarely very interesting. But one arrived in my inbox a couple of weeks ago that made me double-take.
“Sony’s S Series Walkman,” it chattered, “is a serious challenger to the iPod Nano.” Gosh, really? Perhaps the Cult had better have a look at one, then, despite [...]

Psystar Drops Antitrust Claims In Favor Of Copyright Misuse Charge

Psystar, the Florida-based Mac clone maker, now alleges Apple misused its copyright to prevent competition. The new legal theory is part of a modified countersuit the company hopes to file in a California federal court Jan. 15.

The U.S. District Court of Northern California recently dismissed Psystar’s original countersuit, rejecting the company’s claims Apple violated the Clayton Act and Sherman Act antitrust laws.

In a response to the court’s rebuff, Psystar said it “respectfully disagrees” with the ruling by judge William Alsup, who in November granted Apple’s motion to dismiss.

Psystar now alleges Apple violated a “misuse doctrine” disallowing companies to use copyright protections simply to derail competition. In November, Apple alleged Psystar’s Mac clones violated the Digital Millenium Copyright Act.

The alterations by Psystar bypasses the more stringent requirements of proof needed for antitrust claims in favor of simply showing Apple violated the spirit of copyright laws.

As part of its proposed countersuit, which still needs court approval, Psystar alleges Apple’s end-user licensing agreement (EULA) allows the Cupertino, Calif.-based company to exercise excessive control over its hardware. Apple’s lawsuit claims Psystar’s Mac clones violate its EULA.

Additionally, Psystar argues selling computers that behave like Apple machines doesn’t violate copyright laws.

Psystar explained the amended countersuit only simplifies its original response to the Apple lawsuit and that the company may reintroduce antitrust claims when and if it obtains more supporting evidence.

About the author

Ed Sutherland

Ed Sutherland is a veteran technology journalist who first heard of Apple when they grew on trees, Yahoo was run out of a Stanford dorm and Google was an unknown upstart. Since then, Sutherland has covered the whole technology landscape, concentrating on tracking the trends and figuring out the finances of large (and small) technology companies.

Email the author | Read more posts by Ed Sutherland.

2 comments

    what a joke. they aren’t making computers that act like apple computers, they are making computers that run with Apple’s software, in violation of Apple’s copyright.
    someone shut these guys down before they expose even more of their moronic attitudes. oh wait, let them keep it up, they will kill themselves.

    Lucas, you’re an idiot. When you buy a Mac from Psystar you pay for a licensed copy of OS X. Apple gets the money — no copyright is violated. Only a highly questionable and probably illegal licence agreement which tries to dictate where you can install it is ‘violated’. This is much better than the antitrust argument — Psystar has a real case.

Buy Inside Steve's Brain Buy from Amazon.com Buy from Barnes & Noble