How To: Moving from Aperture to Lightroom
9:36 am, October 25th, 2009, Leigh McMullen

Our recent preview of Lightroom 3 – Beta has generated a lot of buzz about the future of digital processing. One of the questions that keeps coming up is: how do I migrate from Aperture to Lightroom?
Well, it’s not has hard as you think, as long as you’re willing to invest a bit of time up-front to do it right.
Follow us after the jump, and we’ll have you loving Lightroom in the amount of time it takes to get a pizza delivered.
A word on directories and such
Now I intentionally do not store images in different directories. A directory hierarchy is just another kind of metadata IMHO, and I prefer tagging and rating instead. If you use directory structure as some kind of implicit metadata (and that’s what it is folks), and want those preserved, you’re gonna have a lot more work ahead, you’ll need to use the process below on each of your main directories or albums.
Instead, you might consider this move as an opportunity to improve the quality of metadata in your library.
The work around this problem is simple: just go into each album or directory, and tag all those images with the directory or album name, then you’ll be able to recreate that structure once you get to Lightroom.
———
Right up front, our biggest hurdle is that for RAW files your local adjustments (contrast, exposure, etc), aren’t going to survive the move –and we don’t want to loose all that work. Additionally, the process for JPG, TIFF, and RAW files are different.
First we’re gonna create a couple of smart albums in Aperture.
- Gather all your photos in Aperture that have adjustments by creating a smart album with the following settings (You need to press the “+” sign next to the search box to add the ‘Search by Adjustments’ feature):

- Next I gather all the non-raw files together. I only use JPG, but if you also use TIFF or PSD, you’ll need to create an album for each. This is as simple as searching for “JPG” or “TIFF” in the smart album box:

- Lastly, like the above, create a smart album with just your RAW files (for Nikonians, search for ‘NEF’)
Now it’s time to export. RAW files and JPG/TIFF files require a different treatment, make sure you export each smart album to a different directory on the disk.
For your RAW masters, export your photos from Aperture using “Export Masters” and make sure the “IPTC4XMP sidecar file” selected under “Metadata” on the export screen. Per below.

Using your “Made Adjustments” smart album, Use “Export Versions” export these files as either JPGs or TIFF at maximum quality t select “Include IPTC” selected under “Metadata” on the export screen per the above. –DO NOT attempt to use the sidecar file, it won’t work.
For your remaining JPG’s or TIFFs, repeat the process above. Select “Export Versions”, and use “Include IPTC”, under Metadata.
Importing into Lightroom 3 Beta
A word of advice. Don’t. –Really, Lightroom 3 is in beta, and isn’t production ready. I’m using LR3-Beta as part of my “Deep Dive” into the product. If you depend upon your images for some or all of your income, use Lightroom 2 instead, the processes are similar enough that you ought to be able to follow along.
–IMPORTANT NOTE: It is worth noting, for your LR2 users out there, that while moving images into LR3 is as easy as pie, what you get is the current version of the file with all adjustments, I’ve not been able to remove all adjustments. – Such is life in Beta-land.
Down to Brass Tacks
For your RAW files, select “File”, “Import Photos”, select “Copy as DNG”, in the “Apply During Import” section, add some metadata like: “Undeveloped RAW” (because that’s what they will be), select a destination directory, and press “Import”

For each of your other export directories, (JPG’s, Images with Adjustments, etc), follow the same process, adding metadata that makes sense.
And there you are, all your images, ratings and tags are in Lightroom.

You can play around with smart collections to restore any directory or album structure you had in Aperture, also you can create some queries to locate your “Developed” images and their underlying RAW files and stack them together. Use these tasks as an opportunity to get to know your new partner in the digital darkroom a little better.
Now, if Aperture 3 comes out with a built in image editor, we’ll follow this article up with another describing how to move back.
Posted by Leigh McMullen in How tos, How-To, Mac At Work, News | Comment on this article












thank you for doing this writeup. it’ll be a few days till i can sit down and test this out, but consider it bookmarked.
Luke, on October 25th, 2009 at 9:48 am
Why not leave the Aperture stuff in Aperture and move *just the new* stuff to Lr? You can still bring in the final exported JPEGs into Lr (or iPhoto or whatever).
A raw file + the Aperture adjustments in an IPTC is not going to automatically bulk-convert into Lr *exactly* anyway. (If you don’t believe me, grab a representative sampling out of your collection and compare differences between the two in Ps.)
Seems like a lot of work just to make Adobe happy, so @LR_Tom can twitter his charts saying Lr has more users than Aperture. I’d rather these guys got busy on a decent (e.g. not pre-beta) raw converter for the 7D anyway (http://twitter.com/LR_Tom/status/4010132137) vs. creating cheerleading charts, since we already know how good Lr is. More functionality, less fanboi-ism.
John.B (Aperture and Lr user)
John.B, on October 25th, 2009 at 11:59 am
@John B.
On local adjustments. Actually **none** of your local adjustments will survive the move. We said as much in the post, which is why we’re encouraging folks to export their adjusted photos as versions (TIFFs or JPGs).
On the wider question of Why move to Lightroom? The only person who can answer that is the individual in question. We’re here to tell you how, not why. Why I did it?, I liked the develop module in Lightroom better especially being able to easily and non-destructively paint settings (exposure, brightness, etc). If Apple offered this (and more) I’d switch back in a heartbeat.
On Fanboyism we here at the Cult are unapologetically Apple fanboys and girls. We’re not pushing folks to Lightroom save that IMHO it’s the best there is right now for photographic workflow. We’d be delighted if Aperture were to surpass it.
Leigh McMullen, on October 25th, 2009 at 12:58 pm
i might just choose a few random projects to try this out on. i don’t personally shoot enough to wait till the next project and i’m not touching the wife’s stuff, as she’s the actual Pro in the house who makes a living from her photography.
Luke, on October 25th, 2009 at 5:53 pm