Top stories

iPhone App Magnets To Appify Your Fridge

20100312-iphonemagnets.jpg

If – like me – your fridge is black, then these shiny iPhone app fridge magnets from Jailbreak Collective will look very smart indeed displayed on the door.
Just 13 bucks gets you a set of these icon almost-replicas. I say almost because if you look carefully, you’ll see they’re not identical to the Apple originals. [...]

Which iPad To Buy? Get the 32GB iPad With Wi-Fi + 3G. Here’s Why.

If you’re in the market for an iPad — and you know you are, because it’s killer — you’re probably wondering which model to buy.
Naturally, you’re looking at the cheapest $499 iPad, which has Wi-Fi only, but you’re thinking you might also want 3G. After all, you can pay-as-you-go for data, and who knows when you [...]

Is Apple Selling 20K iPads an Hour?

Did you buy an iPad when Apple began pre-sales this morning? If so, you weren’t alone. Indeed, Apple may have sold 20,000 iPads per hour, leading one commentator to suggest the Cupertino, Calif. company was earning $10 million per hour on its new tablet device.
The estimate comes from Andrew Erlichson, CEO of Phanfare, a photo [...]

Reader Poll: Will You Pre-Order an iPad?

As we predicted, the iPad went on pre-order in the US this morning in the Apple store after a nail-biting world blackout.
Are you going to reserve yours today or wait? Which one are you getting? Buying your customer limit (2) at once?
Let us know the whys and wherefores of your purchasing decisions in the comments.

Apple’s Fairplay Takes A Drubbing in the Press Today

There’s a lot of criticism of Apple’s copy-protection scheme, Fairplay, in the news today.

Tidbits Adam Engst describes the headaches he encountered trying to make an audio book, which had been split into four chunks, into one easy-to-use file — a perfectly legal and reasonable thing to do.

Newsweek columnist Steven Levy chastises Apple for refusing to license Fairplay and allow consumers to play iTunes songs on other devices.

Ex-Wired News columnist Adam Penenberg, now writing for Slate, wraps it up with a cogent explanantion of why we, the consumers, have to put up with limiting copy-protection schemes. It has little to do with protecting content, and everything to do with protecting business models:

While Apple stands alone and Sony self-destructs, Microsoft is practically giving away its digital-rights-management tool in an effort to pick up market share against Apple (so far with little success). We may even see a replay of the Apple-Microsoft battle over the desktop, which ended with Apple holding on to a tiny sliver of the computer market. There is, however, a big difference between then and now. Steve Jobs has a hefty market share and a massive content library made up of millions of songs at a price that people like. As long as the record companies license their content to Apple and consumers flock to the iPod, Apple is in a powerful — some might say Gatesian — position.

What’s hardest for the consumer to swallow, then, is that anti-piracy schemes like DRM look like the subtle tactic of the monopolist. Neither Apple nor Microsoft is hurt by music piracy. Instead, they use it as a marketing ploy to force people to use their products. It doesn’t have to be this way. The companies could agree on one standard that allows people to play the music they lawfully purchase on whichever player they choose. The music industry is supposed to sell music, not the medium it comes in, right?

If you enjoyed this article:
Subscribe via RSS or email, or follow us on Facebook and Twitter

About the author

lkahney

Email the author | Read more posts by lkahney.

2 comments

    They’re not selling a drill bit, they are selling a method to make a hole.

    I thought it was the content providers (music companies, hollywood, etc) who were insistent on DRM….

Buy Inside Steve's Brain Buy from Amazon.com Buy from Barnes & Noble