Apple Boots a Shady Operator, Still Gets Kicked in the Teeth
6:07 am, August 4th, 2009, Lonnie Lazar
Apple has revoked the iPhone developer’s license of one prolific mobile app developer, according to a report at MobileCrunch, but the company is still taking heat for inconsistencies in its App Store approval policies.
Kahlid Shaikh and his team of 26 engineers working under the name Perfect Acumen had over 900 apps approved and selling in the iTunes App Store until July 24, when Apple terminated Shaikh’s iPhone Developer Program License due to concerns over “numerous third party intellectual property complaints concerning over 100 of [his] Applications.”
The majority of Shaikh’s apps merely aggregated content found on the web and delivered it to iPhone users under titles such as “US Army News”, “Skin Care Updates” and “Economical Crisis Updates”, as well as other questionable content under titles such as “Top Sexy Ladies” and “Top Sexy Men”.
Shaikh admitted he is not concerned about creating particularly valuable apps, according to the MobileCrunch report. Instead, he said, he’s going for “less product value” and “more monetization.” Many of his apps had been sold for $4.99, generating revenue in the range of thousands of dollars per day for Perfect Acumen, according to the report.
Despite having finally grown exasperated with fielding copyright and intellectual property claims against Shaikh, and having acted to remove what some believe was a raft of useless apps from the App Store, Apple is taken to task by the author of the MobileCrunch report for inconsistencies in its App Store review process. The entire brouhaha here is seen as evidence that “Clearly, Apple doesn’t know what the hell it’s doing.”
It appears, in the eyes of some, Apple cannot win for losing, no matter what the company does with the App Store. Either its review process is too open or it’s too restrictive; the store has too many useless apps, bans products users want, or acts to cull sketchy apps — and the end result is “Apple Sucks” no matter what they do.
Apple’s is a difficult position for a company to be in. The company created an entirely new distribution model for an industry that didn’t even exist two years ago. It created opportunity and economic activity that has amounted to one of the few glimmering beacons of hope in what has been roundly described as one of the worst economic downturns in nearly a century. And yet some people seem unable to accept the fact that every single decision made at every step of the way has not resulted in clear skies, smooth sailing and endless joy for one and all.
Make no mistake: Apple is a huge company that can and will act with caprice to get and maintain whatever economic advantage it can in a ruthless marketplace. The FCC appears increasingly interested in the operational nuances among Apple, Google and AT&T, as the formerly moribund antitrust watchdogs of the federal government are starting to prick up their ears under the Obama administration.
However, when Apple acts to shed the likes of Shaikh and his questionable work product from the App Store the company ought to be praised for finally — if belatedly — doing the right thing.
Posted by Lonnie Lazar in Apple, News, Opinions, iPhone, iTunes | Comment on this article
If you enjoyed this article:
Subscribe via RSS or email, or follow us on Facebook and Twitter
Hey, woah..
I know the app store ain’t perfect, but.. if you’ve been checking the daily app updaters like I have you would be well and truly sick of Kahlid Shaikhs incredibly craptasticly lacklustre apps. His apps were so bad, and so numerous, that I actually noticed his name on this story when it popped into my RSS feed and said “about bloody time” out loud.
Apple are imperfect, but I think they did a really good thing here. Kahlid, you annoy me and all decent App store folk, find a new platform.
Zac, on August 4th, 2009 at 6:55 am
Good riddance to all those junk krapps.
Alfred, on August 4th, 2009 at 7:20 am
Ah, the irony of Google quietly egging the DOJ to start anti-trust litigation against Apple and ATT…
jetfuellatte, on August 4th, 2009 at 7:31 am
The problem isn’t that their review process is too open or too restrictive it’s in the actual quality of the reviews.
It is inconsistent and of poor quality. That is why you can have a 1000 fart apps and apps that have no business being in the app store being allowed in. It is also why legitimate apps routinely get blocked from approval or take an unreasonably long time to get approved.
Also, not telling developers why apps get disapproved doesn’t help the situation. The hardware and software is great so Apple was able to create a great user base.
I guess that is why Apple is getting away with crap like this.
Olternaut, on August 4th, 2009 at 7:42 am
well Apple is damned no matter what. folks forget that the apps store is a baby, just as the phone is a toddler. there will be hiccups and stumbles, there will be features that ‘every other smart phone [that has existed for 3-5 years at least] have’ that the iphone doesn’t yet because Apple is adding features slowly to hopefully catch and prevent problems. rather than tossing even the kitchen sink in and having chaos when they can’t figure out what killed things.
as for why it takes so long to get approved. maybe dealing with the complaints about mr 900 apps was bogging things down. that and tracking the guys that were buying their own apps to increase their rankings.
Lucas, on August 4th, 2009 at 8:32 am
moribund – you keep using that word. it does not mean what you think it means
anon@work, on August 4th, 2009 at 9:59 am
@anon: Moribund means precisely what I intended to convey regarding the state of the federal government’s attitude toward enforcement of antitrust law until quite recently.
And to be clear, again, it’s not a matter of opinion, it is a matter of verifiable fact.
Lonnie Lazar, on August 4th, 2009 at 4:47 pm