Top stories

Apple Devotes Entire Home Page To Jerome York Obituary

20100318-york.jpg

If ever you needed a sign that Apple was a different kind of technology company, this is it.
What other computer manufacturer would remove its top-selling, hype-inducing, industry-altering new product from the prime spot on its website home page, and replace it with an obituary to an investor?
This is one of those “Here’s to the [...]

Coming Soon: Steve Jobs, the Sitcom

Fake Steve creator Dan Lyons just signed a deal to bring Steve Jobs to another small screen near you.
The half-hour series called “iCon” is billed by the presser as “a savage satire centering on a fictional Silicon Valley CEO whose ego is a study in power and greed.”
Making sure the barbs prick will be the [...]

What’s Next For the iPad? A Tabletop iPad, According to Xerox PARC Circa 1991

Way back in 1991, just as Apple was transitioning from 68k to PowerPC chips, the braniacs at Xerox PARC were predicting it’s entire iPod, iPhone and iPad strategy. And next up for the iPad is a blackboard-sized device.
Nearly 20 years ago, just as personal desktop computers were taking off, researchers at Xerox started thinking about [...]

iPhone App Arms Users With Silent Panic Button

A new app called Silent Bodyguard features a panic button that sends an SOS distress signal with GPS coordinates to potential rescuers without alerting onlookers.
While the $3.99 app, available on iTunes, isn’t the first ICE (in case of emergency) app, this one is backed by Dr. Clint Van Zandt, former FBI chief hostage negotiator and criminal [...]

Another Logo Sets Apple’s Lawyers Off

Picture 5

The latest corporate apple to be taken to court by Apple is Woolworths, an Australian supermarket chain.

They 80-year-old company restyled their “W” to look like an apple, meant to symbolize fresh produce.

Apple’s lawyers are seeing red, just as they did with the Canadian school, and hope to convince IP Australia, the federal agency that governs trademarks down under, to repeal Woolworths’ application, made last August, to trademark its new logo, according to The Age.

Picture 2

The man who designed it, Hans Hulsbosch, said Apple was taking trademark protection ”to the extreme”. ”Based on this logic, they would have to take action against every fruit-seller.”

Apple has so far declined to comment.

The speculation? That the Aussie retailer has requested a blanket trademark, leaving open the possibility that it could slap that apple on “fresh” computer products and home electronics. It already sells own-brand credit cards and mobile phone plans.

The retailer is expected to fight, since the rebranding took it from being  “seen as a dowdy brand for the uninspired older woman, it was a sensible and unexciting choice… Since it has reinvented itself…it has positioned itself as a brand that understands what people want,” according to brandchannel.

Via The Age

If you enjoyed this article:
Subscribe via RSS or email, or follow us on Facebook and Twitter

About the author

nicole_martinelli

Nicole Martinelli was born in San Francisco and has lived in Milan and Florence, Italy. Cultish tendencies and love for DIY increased while living on the Old Continent, where tech came late and cost more in Big Mac index terms. She's written for Wired.com, The New York Times and Newsweek. Since 1999, she's been tapping away at zoomata. You can also find her on Facebook, Linked in and Twitter.

Email the author | Read more posts by Nicole Martinelli.

14 comments

    Wow, this is indeed extreme on the part of Apple. The Woolworth’s logo is very unique, not resembling Apple’s at all. It has a distinct W and it is GREEN, too! C’mon APPLE!

    Come on… really?

    The way these things are decided is by determining whether or not the Woolworth logo is ‘confusingly similar’ to the Apple logo. My judgement tells me that you can’t mistake one for the other, so I bet Apple gets slapped down here.

    In New Zealand they use this logo for the supermarket chain Countdown. with a bit of creativity you can see the c& d in it.

    this sounds just a bit familiar…didn’t apple records and apple computers have this debate?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Corps_v._Apple_Computer

    I agree with protecting your trademark IF there is the risk of confusion between brands in a specific market place. Such as two companies selling mobile phone devices.

    But, it is very unlikely that Woolworths will ever brand any electronic consumer device with this logo. Woolworths create sub-brands for all their product lines for FMCGs, credit cards, phone plans, etc…

    For example, their mobile plans do not use the ‘apple’ logo, nor do their credit cards. The overarching brand name of Woolworths is text only, no logo, and is secondary to the stylised product line name which is ‘everyday’, ie: Mobile plan is ‘everyday mobile’ and credit card is ‘everyday money’.

    See: http://www.woolworths.com.au/

    So, prepare to see Apple slapped down in this case. As trademark protection and law is localised per country and does not give Apple the same rights and privileges they might receive in say, the US, I expect the Australian courts to tell Apple to give it up. This will set a tidy precedent too.

    what about this use of a Apple in the bible.
    http://sharonxx.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/eve_apple.jpg
    why don’t Jobs sue God, oh I forgot Jobs is God…

    I think Apple’s In-House Attorneys may be short of work this month, and looking for something to fill their day. Perhaps the Woolworth logo is one of those op-art designs that if you stare at it long enough, is spells out “Buy a PC”.

    The morale of this story is: “Turn your leaf on you apple-logo to the other side and Apple will not have a problem with it.”

    Applebee’s and Gwyneth Paltrow, you’re next!

    This is probably because of the difficulty in protecting your trademark if you don’t challenge any and all similar designs. It’s just too important to chance a judge saying, “but you didn’t challenge this other one…” So you go after everybody to make sure you don’t lose the big one for a possible minor oversight.

    Price Chopper (owned by Sobeys) food stores in Canada have a logo that Apple lawyers may find interesting.
    http://tatteredflag.ca/temporary/pricechopper.png

    Seriously, so Apple have now trademarked fruits? What if I decide to bite into an apple and post it on Facebook? Or Flickr? Will Apple come along and say
    “Oh no Mr. SnazzyMax, I’m sorry but we have trademarked the apple and all other fruit which look like apples.”
    Yeah, well that’s what it looks like.
    And why haven’t the sued these companies?:
    Apple Rush
    Apple Federal Credit Union Bank
    Big Apple Motorcycle School
    FNEP
    Hmmmmm….

Add your comment

Name(Required)

Mail (required, but not published)

Website

Comment

Buy Inside Steve's Brain Buy from Amazon.com Buy from Barnes & Noble