Analysts: Tablet Could Offer ‘Stunning’ Graphics
12:12 pm, November 16th, 2009, Ed Sutherland
Apple’s much-awaited tablet device may include graphics capable of “stunning resolution” able to outshine the iPod, iPhone and possibly sound a death-knell for Amazon’s Kindle. The device, which many expect to see during the first quarter of 2010, may also offer a Webcam for mobile video conferencing, according to a survey of analyst speculation.
Analyst Laura DiDio of ITIC told CNNMoney.com the device will include a “high-end graphics card” for its 10- to 12-inch screen. “The tablet will change the game, because Apple will throw down the gauntlet at the competitors, and force them to follow along,” DiDio told the Web site.
The tablet, reported to be CEO Steve Jobs’ No. 1 priority since returning from a liver transplant, may arrive in several versions, including a Wi-Fi or 3G version via AT&T, the exclusive U.S. iPhone carrier. DiDio said pricing may be lower than usual for first-time Apple products, an indication that Cupertino understands demand for low-cost netbooks as well as its mistake of reducing the market for its original iPhone priced at $599. Piper Jaffray analyst Gene Munster estimates Apple could sell 2 million tablets in the first year.
Although analysts surveyed believe a tablet could split the market of people looking toward netbooks for computing power and Amazon’s Kindle for purely reading, other insiders question whether an Apple tablet would “kill” single-purpose electronic readers.
“If you want to sit and read a book, the ergonomics of a device that’s specifically designed for reading are going to be better,” Yankee Group analyst Zeus Kerravala told CNNMoney.com. Apple has conducted talks with a number of publishers about offering “hybrid content” when a tablet launches.
In another clue to possible movement on building a tablet, an Apple engineer reportedly has made several trips to China with further jaunts planned over the upcoming holiday period. The trips potentially signal the China-based hardware maker Foxconn is preparing to meet an order of 300,000 tablets per month, according to the New York Times.
While speculation continues to swirl around an Apple tablet, competitors have not stood idle. In October, word leaked the bookseller Barnes & Noble was preparing its own e-reader to compete with both the iPhone and Amazon’s Kindle.
[Via CNN Money and AppleInsider]
Posted by Ed Sutherland in News | Comment on this article
If you enjoyed this article:
Subscribe via RSS or email, or follow us on Facebook and Twitter
Barnes & Noble’s nook & iPad have zero to do with each other.
The only way ereaders survive is > $99 pricing.
If they stay priced the way they are, people will say:
“For an extra few dollars I can get an iPad that does so much more.”
A $99 price gives ebooks I-Can- Buy/Use-This-Just-For-Reading cache.
CaryMG, on November 16th, 2009 at 4:42 pm
It is impossible to believe that the company that introduced the mouse to everyday computing along with little innovations like
1. the Mac and its GUI
2. the ipod
3. the iphone
would do anything so banal (as a bigger iphone).
Why oh why does everyone think this?
Do tell.
ged, on November 16th, 2009 at 7:54 pm
When it happens, the Apple tablet will mark the extinction of the Kindle and similar platforms. I expect my daughters will be reading their textbooks, watching movies and surfing the web on a tablet by this time next year.
Allan, on November 16th, 2009 at 8:00 pm
I’ve been interested in tablet computers ever since MS’s ill-fated foray years ago. I think that we will eventually have low-priced wireless readers/writers scattered around the house like pads of paper.
You would grab your favorite deluxe tablet for the commute to work, and one that’s laying on the couch to catch up on TV and newspapers. Inexpensive ones might be best for the kid’s “finger painting” projects, which could be saved on the home server and displayed anywhere, anytime.
Apple’s ultra-deluxe tablet is a great start. But we need cheap ones to leave them laying around the house or to take to the beach or to throw into a bag for a picnic.
iGenius, on November 17th, 2009 at 7:54 am
ged has a point.
An iPad *is* just a big iPhone.
Not innovative.
BUT — und zees iss a big “but” — the iPhone isn’t “innovative”, per se, either — it is just a vast improvement on an existing item.
So the iPad’ll b a VAST “improvement”, if you will, on an iPhone.
CaryMG, on November 17th, 2009 at 10:34 am