Psystar releases new Mac clone

Psystar releases new Mac clone
Psystar Corp., the Florida company fighting with Apple in federal court over selling computers that run Mac OS X, launched a new, slimmer clone.

The $600 Open(3) computer, sold exclusively on the company’s website,  has an Intel 2.8-GHz Core 2 Duo processor, 2GB of memory, a 500GB hard drive and an Nvidia GeForce 8400GS graphics card with 256MB of RAM in its standard configuration.

FireWire, Bluetooth and wireless hardware cost extra, however, as does a keyboard, mouse and monitor, none of which is bundled with the box, putting it up for competition with the base model Mac Mini, which also retails for $599, without monitor, keyboard or mouse.

Psystar started selling Intel-based computers with Mac OS X preinstalled last April.  In July 2008,  Apple filed a lawsuit accusing the company of copyright and software licensing violations.

A month later, Psystar filed a countersuit, which was tossed out in November 2008.

Psystar, however, refused to back down.  In February it won a round after a judge ruled that it could amend its countersuit to charge Apple with abusing copyright laws by tying Mac OS X to its own hardware.

DON'T MISS
Psystar’s New Lawyers: We May Be David vs. Goliath, but We’re Not Crazy

Via Computer World

About the author

nicole_martinelli

Nicole Martinelli is a San Francisco native who has lived in Milan and Florence, Italy. She's written for Wired.com, The New York Times and Newsweek. You can find her on Twitter , Facebook and Google+.

If you're doing something new/cool that's Apple related, email her about it.

(sorry, you need Javascript to see this e-mail address)| Read more posts by .

Posted in News | Tagged: |

  • Lucas

    they must have a heck of a lot of money to sling around cause you can bet when they lose, and they will, the damages will be based around units sold.

  • Kitty

    Wow, that’s crazy! I can’t believe they would file a countersuit. They’re gonna lose big time.

  • J Deveraux

    If I were them, I would have just contributed towards the OSX86 project and sold PCs that contained some sort of informational blurb that they “might” work with it; than just fully defying Apple publicly.

    I do take a different approach to this argument though; I think Apple really needs to look at opening OS X up to the rest of the PC market and leave driver-development up to the vendors. GO GO Direct competition with windows!