App Store Subscription Plan Demolishes the Appeal of iOS

App Store Subscription Plan Demolishes the Appeal of iOS

The broad application of Apple’s new App Store subscription guidelines to everything from magazines (sensible) to Kindle books (questionable) to Readability (delusional) to Tiny Grab and possibly DropBox (downright silly) could end up being the single-worst business decision the Cupertino Colossus has made in the last decade, for one very simple reason: it seeks to maximize App Store revenue at the expense of making iPhones and iPads the most attractive hardware platforms on the market. Getting 30% of Readability’s revenue cannot possibly justify the risk of making the iPad sell a few hundred thousand fewer units.

Think about it. If you’re an average consumer and you’re trying to decide between an iPad and one of the many Android Honeycomb tablets scheduled to ship in the next few months, the ability to put your existing content on that tablet would likely be a key decision in that process. Both can take MP3s, and the iPad can take video content from iTunes. But if the trend continues in the direction is has been thus far, the iPad won’t have Kindle books or possibly even Netflix by the time the full impact of the subscription guidelines plan shakes it self out. It’s a pretty easy choice for consumers under those circumstances.

Apple really needs to take a step back and redo these guidelines.

First, remove the restriction preventing apps from directing users to a web page to make their purchases. It simply is not possible that the lost revenue from those sales is equivalent or better than the value of having the best possible content library available on iOS.

Second, apply the revenue split only to subscription applications intended strictly for iOS. Charge that fee as it applies to magazines and publications designed for the platform and leave things like Kindle, Netflix and Dropbox out of the equation. Since Apple won’t be footing the bandwidth to deliver the content for such subscriptions, there is no possible justification for taking a cut of the revenue from them other than greed.

Third, remember what business you’re in. The entire purpose of the App Store and iTunes is to make Apple’s hardware more attractive to users. It’s not actually to enforce hardware lock-in, it’s to create a platform that is so superior in its capabilities, content, and experience that the costs of switching are too great for people to contemplate. If you drive away the content and tools they use on all sorts of other platforms, you’ll ultimately make Android and Windows Phone 7 actually start to seem like more reasonable choices. To date, Apple has only sold 10 billion songs and change. Of that, Apple cleared no more than $3 billion in revenue, and probably no more than $1 billion in profit. That’s all nice, but it represents seven years of sales so far. Last quarter, the iPad generated well over a billion in profit by itself. Apps are there to increase the latter number, not try to turn app sales into a meaningful business.

I continue to watch in horror as ever-more respected apps announce that they have run afoul of the new guidelines. This is a dumb decision on Apple’s part, and there are no excuses that make it sensible, as the increasingly desperate rationale of John Gruber has shown. Tim Cook should show some leadership here and write an open letter explaining how much more narrowly the rules will be applied from here on out. Anything else hurts the long-term potential of the platform I love. Remember: Just because you could get money from every transaction associated with your platform doesn’t mean that you should. Some charges just make you into a jerk.

  • Charel

    Poor Pete, the only thing Apple is likely to change is the rule of allowing app developers to charge less on their own websites.

    They will not ever be allowed to direct users to their websites in their apps. All the other rules make perfect sense. If publishers wish to access Apples client base they have to defray Appleā€™s expenses by paying the 30%.

  • paulmwatson

    I am Steve Job’s funny bone. Ah ha ha. Ha ha ha. Ha ha ha ha. Ahahahahahahahaha!

    Funny article.

  • Sophlady

    Now, I remember why I stopped reading Cult of the Mac. It is a waste of time.

    The ‘give me a free ride Apple or else’ argument presented in this cretinous entry has no legs and is not about to grow any. Apple will continue to attract plenty of developers and content delivery applications to iOS. Despite all the ‘gonnabes,’ the iPad has 90% of the market, is the only full-size tablet available today, and, is about to beget iPad 2. Other than perhaps explaining why it is necessary to not allow price gouging in the App Store, Apple should maintain its stance. Developers and content providers don’t have the right to rip the company off Mortensen claims.

About the author

Pete Mortensen

Pete Mortensen is a design strategist for consulting firm Jump Associates and the co-author of Wired to Care: How Companies Prosper When They Create Widespread Empathy, a book and blog that are significantly more interesting than you might initially think. Pete's particular Apple avocations are both around design--interface and industrial. Follow him on Twitter!

(sorry, you need Javascript to see this e-mail address)| Read more posts by .

Posted in Opinions, Top stories |