Etymotic’s Hf2s Get It Right On Every. Single. Count. [Review]

Etymotic’s Hf2s Get It Right On Every. Single. Count. [Review]

Maybe it’s my (only somewhat) jaded inner journalist, but bubbly marketing language almost never rouses me. So naturally, I dismissed the phrases “rediscover your music” and “stunning mobile music fidelity,” printed on the box of Etymotic’s microphone-equipped hf2 earphones, as standard advertising blather.

After a few hours of listening to music through the hf2s I went back and read the box again, this time with wider eyes — because damned if for once some outfit’s marketing department hadn’t made a claim that was actually spot-on accurate. In fact, the thought crossing my mind as I gleefully ripped through my music collection, trying to see how many tracks would give me goosebumps, was that maybe those marketing peeps had even been too subtle about the hf2’s performance — that maybe the box should have just been plastered in wild neon stickers bearing candid phrases like “THESE ARE *&@#$ AWESOME!!” (and that’s why I wouldn’t last long in marketing).

The first half of key to the $180 hf2’s astonishing sonic performance is in how each ear’s single armature transmits sound: accurate, measured, with no fuzziness, buzzing or harshness evident with any type of music I listened to. Bass takes on a warm, enveloping quality, and  the ‘phones seem to transmit the low frequency stuff extremely well; highs are crystal clear and vibrant. Also impressive was that, for the most part (with one small exception, see below), music seemed superbly balanced and smooth, as if every frequency was somehow in perfect focus and brought to the fore.

The second half of the equation are the hf2’s set of eartips. Standard with most of Etymotic’s offerings, the set consists of four pairs of tips that look as if they were ripped straight from a Dr. Seuss book: industrial-sized foam tips; “glider” foam tips, which resemble something launched from the barrel of a Nerf weapon; and two differently sized pairs of truly evil-looking flanged cones. But boy are they effective.

Etymotic’s Hf2s Get It Right On Every. Single. Count. [Review]

The hf2's eartips look scary, work like magic.

The much longer-lasting flanged tips reduce sound by about 35 decibels. The gargantuan foam tips kill up to 42 dB worth, but degrade with time, eventually needing replacement. All are highly effective to extremely effective at creating a practically airtight seal and preventing sound from leaking in or out. They’re certainly the most effective tips I’ve ever tried — in fact, noise-isolation surprised by equalling or even exceeding that of a good set of active noise-cancelling cans. Which is good, because a tight seal is absolutely critical to the performance of the hf2s, as bass will leak out almost completely with a compromised seal — a characteristic common with many canalphones, but apparently more acute in the hf2.

While all three types (I picked the large flanged tips over the small) seal exceptionally well, I found the big foam tips the most comfortable; the flanged tips took a little more work to insert into my ears (my canals apparently have freakishly sharp bends) but not much, and were almost as comfy. Since the tips seem to need placement deeper into the canal even than most other canalphones, there was a somewhat uncomfortable sense of intrusion in the beginning before I was used to them; but it faded quickly.

The other big thing about the hf2 is, of course, the high-sensitivity microphone, which seems to transmit speech more clearly and with less effort on my part compared to other inline mics I’ve tested. Phone-call test subjects were pleased, and even random Voice Control errors dropped noticeably. However, wind noise seems more problematic than usual, likely due to the high sensitivity of the mic.

As with many microphone-equipped headphones, a single button controls music, calls and Voice Control; volume is absent (though that’s been added for the iPhone 3Gs and 4 on Etymotic’s new hf3, which excluding the new volume control is identical to the hf2).

Etymotic’s Hf2s Get It Right On Every. Single. Count. [Review]

Finally, the hf2s scream quality and attention to detail absolutely everywhere. The J-bend jack is at an optimal angle that protects the cord where it ends at the gold-plated jack, yet makes it easy to swivel; the Kevlar-reinforced cord itself seems impossible to tangle; the massive clip is ugly, but rugged and more useful than the smaller clips standard on other ‘phones; and the long, satin-finished earphone bud bodies are easily gripped when inserting or removing from ears — a design element that doesn’t seem important until you’ve tried the hf2s and realize how difficult it is to get other buds stuffed into your ears.

Also included is a natty zippered case with storage area for extra tips, and an extra set of filters and replacement tool. At about $6 per pair, the filters are an extra expense; but Etymotic says they’re necessary to protect the armatures from wax and should last anywhere from three months to a year-and-a-half, depending on how waxy the user’s ears are.

Sonically, the hf2s outperform canalphones in their class, and even best well-respected earphones priced higher. Throw in their longevity, ergonomics and the excellent mic, and those wild yellow stickers maybe start to make sense.

Rating: ★★★★★

DON'T MISS
Etymotic’s Custom Eartips Comfy, But Suffer From Sibling Rivalry [Review]

Apps you might like

  • trospero

    How do these compare to higher priced IEMs like the Shure SE530s, I wonder?

  • Eli Milchman

    Trospero, interesting question. At more than double the price, the se535s (which have supplanted the discontinued 530s) and their ilk are in a different class, making for a tricky comparison.

  • Cooper

    @Eli When you say the Shure is in another class, do you mean a higher class or lower class?

  • trospero

    Hi Eli,
    Thanks for commenting back. So, is it your opinion, then, that it isn’t fair to make a comparison between these two, since the SE530s and SE535s are in an entirely different class of IEM? If that is your belief, then I’ll withdraw the question. (and rightly so :-))

    Thanks!

  • DAvid

    I purchased a pair of these shortly after purchasing my iPhone. While I’d used other earphones before, these were totally different. With previous headphones I listened to the music; with these I EXPERIENCED the music. It was as if the tunes were inside my head — what a wonderful experience! I’d recommend these to anyone who truly enjoys uninterrupted music.

    DAvid

  • http://hucbald.blogspot.com/ Hucbald

    I’ve used nothing but Etymotic in-ear earphones since shortly after getting my first generation iPod back in Y2K. Why pair an expensive MP3 player with cheap earbuds? The non-mic versions were ER-4′s back then. I’m a musician, so I was turned on to them by a live sound engineer, who used them to block out external noise as he did his mixes. I found out later that LOTS of live sound guys use them.

    One great use for them – illegal in many states – is under a motorcycle helmet. I’ve used them coast to coast with my successive generations of iPods and iPhones while touring on my Beemer.

    Just as soon as these HF-2′s came out, I got them… circa a year ago. They are also awesome on my eight mile walks, but sweat can trigger the voice command feature on the iPhone, so keep the mic housing dry.

  • imajoebob

    Price doesn’t count???

    180 bucks for portable earphones is just STUPID. Spend 50 bucks on a great set of Sennheisers and then go buy 5 or 6 winter coats for the homeless.

  • Porkchop1234

    Sennheiser buds are crap

  • Eli Milchman

    Trospero, no, I think your question is fair enough; it just makes for a tricky (but nevertheless worthwhile) comparison, because the phones are not really created for the same (…and I hate using the word consumer, so…ah, here’s a better one…) listener. The se530/5s use three drivers, the hf2 just one; we haven’t tested the se530s yet, but my guess is that the se530/5s will sound better (but I could be wrong). The real question is, will they sound good enough to justify paying more than double the price of the hf2s? And of course, the answer is subjective: for instance, true audiophiles may rationalize that the extra expense is worth any performance boost; my brother, on the other hand, thinks $50 earbuds are a splurge. The reason the hf2s were awarded the five-star rating is not because they’re the best-sounding IEMs out on the market — but rather that, performance-per-dollar, the hf2s far exceed expectations.

    @Cooper: the reply above should answer your question.

    @imajoebob: ditto, but good point.

  • http://quadesl.com stokessd

    I’ve had the $99 (mailorder) Shure headphones, and the $100 (mailorder) Etymodic Headphones. In my somewhat jaded opinion, the Ety’s are much better. I bought the HF2′s about a year ago and I have to say that they are very very good.

    The Ety’s try to be tonally accurate, so they may sound thin or odd compared to the colored headphones many brands are foisting on the public these days.

    I use Grado headphones, Quad ESL63′s, and my DIY electrostatic speakers as my home references.

    So to me when the above poster said the Shure headphones are in a whole other league, I read that is a much lower league (little league).

    Sheldon

  • http://www.astralcouriers.co.uk Jon

    I had the ER.6 many years ago – perfect, flawless.
    Replaced them (lost) with these HF2s and had the same, if not better, quality brought to my music and speech – with the added bonus of a mic!
    Only downside was that I needed to replace them due to a dodgy connection at the jack end after about 10 months. Could have been me, could have been my kids, could have been in manufacture. We’ll never know, but Apple replaced them no questions asked.

  • Anonymous

    Spot on review, Eli. I have the hf3′s which are identical except for the controls.
    Initially, insertion felt awkward and unsuccessful but persevere and the rewards are stunning!
    Trouble is, I’m now eyeing off the ER-4 series…

About the author

Eli MilchmanWhen he was eight, Eli Milchman came home from frolicking in the Veld one day and was given an Atari 400. Since then, his fascination with technology has made him an intrepid early adopter of whatever charming new contraption crosses his path — which explains why he's Cult of Mac's test editor-at-large. He calls San Francisco home, where he works as a journalist and photographer. Eli has contributed to the pages of Wired.com and BIKE Magazine, among others. Hang with him on Twitter.

(sorry, you need Javascript to see this e-mail address)| Read more posts by .

Posted in Hardware, iPhone, iPhone & iPod Accessories, iPod, Music, Reviews, Top stories | Tagged: , , , , , , , , |