New iPod nano: More than Just a Pretty Wristwatch

New iPod nano: More than Just a Pretty Wristwatch

Steve Jobs launched an insta-meme today by suggesting in his keynote that Apple’s new multi-touch iPod nano could be worn as a wristwatch.

The meme becomes a fad next week when the nano arrives in stores and people start actually wearing them on wrists. It’s going to happen, especially when third-party companies begin offering special-purpose wristwatch straps for it. I know it’s going to happen because I’m going to do it.

Talk is cheap, but a Huffington Post poll at post time was running over 67% in favor of wearing the iPod nano as a wristwatch.

But serving as Apple’s first-ever foray into the wristwatch racket isn’t what’s ground-breaking about the device.

What’s important to note is that the new nano is by far the smallest ever gadget with real MPG (multi-touch physics and gestures). It’s the first significant consumer MPG device that’s not a so-called “computer” or cell phone or multi-purpose device. As such, it represents the future of mobile gadgets in general.

During the past 20 years, we’ve seen a lot of analog “stuff” replaced by digital equivalents. Brick-and-mortar bookstores are being upended by online eBook stores, for example. Since the iPhone mainstreamed the MPG interface three years ago, a new era emerged whereby real, physical buttons are being replaced by touch screen controls.

All Apple’s previous MPG devices were in the same “family.” There was the iPhone, then the “iPhone without the phone” iPod Touch, then the “giant iPhone” iPad. But the iPod nano is an entirely different device in function, purpose, scale and kind. It’s the first Apple multi-touch product, for example, that does not run iOS. It’s the first without apps. It’s entirely different, yet feels exactly the same.

You swipe your finger across the screen to see icons on the next screen. You use two fingers and twist to change the orientation. Touch to play. It’s just like an iPhone. It will easily pass the “two-year-old test.” where toddlers use it successfully without instruction.

And it puts to shame tablet and phone efforts by other companies that cluelessly unveiled touch devices without MPG.

DON'T MISS
September iPod Event: Apple Unveils New Multitouch iPod Nano

In addition to being ground-breaking, the new nano is just generally cool — and useful. Jobs said in his keynote today that it’s 46% smaller and 42% lighter than the old version. It has a built-in pedometer and an FM radio with TiVo-like “pausing” of live radio. The device gets 24-hour battery life and comes in silver, graphite, blue, green, orange and pink for $149 for 8GB and $179 for 16GB of storage. A red nano will be available exclusively in the Apple store.

Ultimately, the “importance” of a device depends on how strongly it influences other companies and other products. Of course, Apple products get copied. But I believe the new iPod nano will trigger a tsunami of tiny appliance devices, from TV remote controls to fitness gadgets to digital cameras that mimic or copy of the iPod nano user interface.

If the iPhone ushered in the consumer MPG computing era, then iPod nano has ushered in the MPG consumer appliance era.

And it just might save the wristwatch concept. Time will tell.

About the author

mikelgan

Mike Elgan is a Silicon Valley-based columnist who writes about technology and culture. His work appears in a variety of publications, including Computerworld, Datamation, PC World, InfoWorld, MacWorld, ITWorld, CIO, the San Francisco Chronicle. Subscribe to Mike's e-mail newsletter, Mike's List, and follow him on Twitter, Facebook, Digg and elsewhere by visiting http://elgan.com.

(sorry, you need Javascript to see this e-mail address)| Read more posts by .

Posted in iPod, Top stories | Tagged: , |

  • AJ Main

    Actually the first gen iPod touch did not have Bluetooth Support

  • boloboi

    YES!!

  • http://elgan.com Mike Elgan

    Right you are, AJ. I’ve made the correction. : )

  • http://www.Plai.tv Fernando

    Do you think your concept will be cooler than ours: http://www.plai.tv/blog.php?id=20&p=&search=

  • Xeph

    Nice idea, but the headphone cable for this thing is gonna have to be damn long if your on walkabout (or otherwise you gonna have to walk around with your wrist in the air?).

  • weeraanmelden

    @Xeph
    Never hold an iOs device in your hand?
    Thats even a longer distance than your wrist ;)

  • http://elgan.com Mike Elgan

    I don’t think it would make sense to wear it on your wrist while listening to music. You wear it on your wrist to tell the time, show people pictures of your kids and use the stopwatch.

    For example, most of us don’t listen to iPods while at work in the office, and so we don’t bring them to work. But if your iPod is your wristwatch, you would want to have it on while at work.

    When you want to listen to music, you’d probably want to clip it on your shirt or something.

  • Brian

    Dick Tracy at last.. well almost. The technology is there, aka the new iPod touch. How long before FaceTime and front camera hits this?

  • http://www.Plai.tv Fernando

    Bluetooth headphones would solve the problem :]

  • drumstyx

    This is a great first step, but we will truly be “there” when we’ve got connectivity in that wristwatch. We need FaceTime and email. How futuristic eh!?

  • http://elgan.com Mike Elgan

    Ha! FaceTime on your wrist. Wouldn’t that be cool.

  • JW.

    I, for the first time, am excited by the iPod nano. Nice work Apple.

  • alexis

    it’s a really cool device…can’t wait to see all the new accessories that come out of the woodwork for the new nano

  • alexis

    oh not to mention all the people that will bitch cuz it doesn’t have a video camera any more and doesn’t have a wide screen display

  • zholy

    I would have absolutely no use for this whatsoever.
    I need one now.I found a free ipod video converter for Aneesoft.waiting for new ipod….lol!

  • William Carr

    Heh, heh, heh.

    Apple’s next product, the iCom. The iPhone shrunk down to wristwatch size plus included Bluetooth earpiece.

    Makes Facetime calls too.

    I’ve been predicting that for months. Surprising that Steve would tip his hand though. Maybe he decided to test the waters first.

    It may be about a year before the iCom is really ready to ship.

    Meanwhile people get used to the idea of the Dick Tracy iPod Watch.

  • J

    How do you know it doesn’t run iOS ?

  • john q public

    Are other companies clueless? Or do they avoid MPG to avoid licensing the IP? Is the licensing prohibitively and purposely costly?

  • Jeremy

    It sure looks like iOS to me… and why *wouldn’t* they use iOS?

  • Matthew

    I think the point isn’t that it doesn’t use iOS at all but it doesn’t use it in the traditional sense. You can’t put iPhone or iPod touch apps on it, or rather iOS apps.

    I’m sure the interface was derived from and is still largely iOS but by saying it doesn’t run on iOS you prevent confusion from people who will assume that if it is iOS it will run apps the same way too.

  • Steve

    If I can’t wear it when it’s raining/snowing, or when it’s really cold outside, then I don’t want one.

  • Bill D

    I’m not impressed with the new design. OK, so it’s pretty slick looking. But I use my previous generation Nano when I exercise. To change a song, I reach down to my waste clip, find the click wheel with my fingers, and push the Next button. I never have to even look at the thing.

    With the new Nano, since there’s no way to know where you are by touching the smooth glass display, I know that I’d have to always be looking at the device to use it. Putting it on your wrist solves that problem to a degree, I guess, but now the headphone wire are getting wrapped around your forearm or your hands while you’re trying to use them.

    I played around with one at an Apple store this past weekend. In addition to my Nano, I also have an iPhone 3GS, so I’m quite familiar with how Apples’ touch screen devices work. Yet I had difficulty getting the Nano to respond to my gestures and found it difficult and unimpressive to use. The screen just seeemd too small to be useful. Plus, as I noted, I could never do anything with it without having to look at it.

    I think the new Nano leaves a hole in Apples’ iPod lineup. They need a flash drive-based device with a click wheel, a screen, and decent amounts of storage. Either the shuffle will get a screen next go-around, or the Nano will see a return of the click wheel. Either way, I agree that MPG-based devices are great. I love my iPhone more than any device I’ve ever owned, but MPG isn’t the solution for every problem and there’s still plenty of good uses for devices with click-wheels.

  • Rob

    Mike,

    I see what you are saying about the MPG devices and things moving that way and, honestly, it saddens me.

    You see, I can’t use those devices. Especially if they have a capacitive touch screen instead of a resistive. I burned my hands badly when I was younger and, well, my finger tips are really just large calluses. The iPhone touch screens everyone marvels at… Worthless to me, unless I want to live my life working my phone with my pinky finger. And, Capacitive screens don’t respond well to styluses. I’m probably the single reason there is a market for the 3 packs of the old, cheap, plastic “Palm pilot” type styluses. I have to keep one in my pocket for touch screen ATM’s and debit card machines.

    I don’t think everything will every completely go touch screen. I pray it doesn’t for my sake. But, also, what about blind users? They can’t see the screen and depend on the brail on the buttons.

    This (Along with Apple’s insistence on tying the iPhone to the iTunes store and controlling what you can put on your own phone) is why I will sick with my BlackBerry. My physical keyboard works far better for me than any touch screen device. And, I don’t have to HACK (Jailbreak) it to install any program I want on it without getting Steve “App God” Jobs blessing.

    Rob

  • http://yesyes.yonkly.com/brennababineaux254 candidates for 2010 election

    Actually the first gen iPod touch did not have Bluetooth Support

  • Julie Rothberg

    Nice but I got a Nanotch. It at least protects my $150 toy.