Review: Apple, Rolling Stone and the Unsatisfying State of Digital Publishing

kurt.jpg

Rolling Stone‘s Special Issue of the 500 Greatest Songs of All Time made its debut Tuesday on Zinio, a digital publishing platform that could spell the difference between “survive” and “thrive” for old-school media publications looking to keep the doors open in coming years.

With a stable of top-tier periodicals such as National Geographic, Esquire, American Photo, Car & Driver and many more, Zinio definitely leads the way in showing how paper publications might remain not only relevant but vital and attractive to a new generation of “readers” weaned on the sizzle and flash of gaming and 3D entertainment.

Publication is morphing into something beyond simple words and pictures, evolving into an immersive medium that both pushes ideas and information out to consumers — and draws them in with interactive features and activities that take one beyond the superficial layers of what an article or essay might seem to offer.

Thus, with such crucial stakes at hand, did Zinio, Apple and Rolling Stone produce something of a mixed scorecard with the 500 Greatest issue.

Zinio is available as a free app in the iTunes App Store (link) and supports all three of Apple’s mobile hardware devices, the iPad, iPhone and iPod Touch, in addition to offering cloud-based services accessible through a web browser on any computer connected to the internet.

Most magazines in the catalog can be purchased in-app by the single issue or by subscription — and these transactional nuts and bolts Zinio has down cold.

Not surprisingly, some of the more ephemeral aspects of this digital publishing game, such as delivering the content and handling the fancy interactive bells and whistles on offer, work best — and look best — on the iPad.

To begin with, the larger screen is far more suited to showcasing the visual media of traditional magazines, and the iPad’s core processor seems to deliver a faster, smoother user experience than either Zinio on the web or using the app on the smaller iPhone and iPod Touch. While the iPhone 4’s Retina Display enhances the visual experience on that device, downloading magazines on an older device is an opportunity to cultivate patience, at best.

With respect to the Rolling Stone 500 Greatest issue itself, Apple missed a great opportunity to promote its own assets as well as the future of interactive publishing.

What a great idea, to offer embedded tracks of the music being written about in a magazine devoted to the 500 Greatest Songs of All Time. Right? What better way to showcase the multidimensional nature of publishing that lies just over the horizon?

The missed opportunity here lies in the 30 second samples embedded in the magazine. Couldn’t Apple have used the technology it purchased with the once-promising LaLa to offer whole cuts of each song that could be played all the way through once — for free — as LaLa offered its customers and as other music services such as iLike and Rhapsody offer now?

DON'T MISS
Digital Americana: A Magazine For iPad, And A Sign Of Things To Come

Is Apple further away from being able to stream iTunes than we think, or was this merely a short-sighted caving to the lure of easy money and the idea that people would just buy the music if the 30 second sample has an iTunes link?

Regardless, what’s been served up is hundreds of annoying 30 second samples that do little but defeat the interactive purpose of the new digital publishing realm and leave readers doing exactly what they did with old paper copies of magazines in the days of yore, flipping pages and looking at the pretty pictures.

Plus, even if someone does want to purchase a copy of Smells Like Teen Spirit, doing so requires leaving the app and the magazine behind and going into iTunes to do that dance. The whole point of Zinio’s approach to digital publication is to immerse readers in the magazine, to take them deeper and deeper into content, into impulse buying opportunities — yes — but not to drive them out of the magazine and into the byzantine realms of something like iTunes.

Which doesn’t even begin to address the complete absence of even samples — or links — to the many Beatles songs that happen to be among the 500 Greatest Songs of All Time.

Of course, that’s a whole ‘nother story.

About the author

Lonnie Lazar

Lonnie Lazar is a writer-musician-web designer-attorney. He writes about Apple for Cult of Mac and Mac|Life, and about VoIP and telecommunications for Voxilla. Follow Lonnie on Twitter @LonnieLazar, join the Cult of Mac on Facebook, and find Lonnie's photos on Flickr.

(sorry, you need Javascript to see this e-mail address)| Read more posts by .

Posted in Apple, Media, Music, News, Reviews |

  • Ping this

    Cheers to a nice write-up on one corner of the digital publishing world. The publishing industry (all media, not just print) and we the consumers are in the early stages of a change so fundamental, we can barely see the small section of woods we’re in, let alone the whole forest.

    As a graphic designer still doing the majority of my work in print, I’m excited about the prospects this new media offers, but lamenting the seeming lack of daring in pursuing the potential opportunities. As usual, money seems to be the driving factor. Licensing content is perhaps the biggest hurdle in offering some of the extras noted in this article. True innovation is also lacking – so far.

    My deepest regret in how this shift is shaping up to date is one of the things we consumers have always taken for granted in the dead tree paradigm: easily sharing content. One of the nicest things about owning a good book or beautifully designed magazine is the ability to loan it to a friend. Until the publishers of all media can work out a way to bring this to the digital realm, it will always be only an echo of what we have enjoyed for hundreds of years.

  • Johnny Rocket

    Many years ago, the print version of Rolling Stone offered a “family tree” of various blues based bands, showing who influenced whom, who later played with another band, etc.

    Even then, I wished that somehow there was a way to actually HEAR those influences. How Robert Johnson’s style led to …; how Chicago Blues differed from Delta Blues… whose style of play shaped ZZ Top or Stevie Ray Vaughan own style. ETC.

    More than a decade later, we actually have the means to deliver this kind of “mixed media publication,” but the Legals prevent it from reality. Now, if you are an individual who creates a simple website with these features, it might sneak under the radar for a while– but odds are it will be quashed quickly.

    Any wonder that file sharing still thrives?

  • BMWTwisty

    “…into the byzantine realms of something like iTunes.” C’mon, gimme a break. Like you can’t figure out how to go from Zinio to iTunes and back – with multi-tasking? This claim is just silly and petty. The charge of not utilizing one-time 30-second tracks in the article is valid, however. The format is nascent and will quickly evolve.

  • http://cultofmac.com Lonnie Lazar

    Everyone has a right to their opinion, Twisty. Personally, I find iTunes to be a bloated mess of way too many things being offered in way too many ways with way too many lists and way too much flashy graphics. My point wasn’t that iTunes is difficult to navigate – and so Byzantine might not have been my best word choice ever – but that taking the reader out of the app and into iTunes could tend to lead him or her down paths that might mean not coming back to the app any time soon. Not an epic fail by any means but, to me (as the headline says), unsatisfying.

  • tbot886

    I think this is the perfect introduction to the scope and depth of digital publishing in creating interactive publications for the future. I completely disagree with you regarding “30 second samples that do little but defeat the interactive purpose of the new digital publishing realm…” If anything, Rolling Stone 500 is a great example of how publishers can utilize video, music, and other rich media content for their publications. Furthermore, rich content increases reader attention and comprehension of the material.You make it seem like going into iTunes to purchase the song completely ruins the overall experience. If a reader is willing to purchase a song right after reading the article and hearing the 30 second clip, doesn’t that mean that they are already completely engaged with the magazine?