Apple to remove screen protectors and films from online store

Apple to remove screen protectors and films from online store

If you need a screen protector for your iPhone, prepare to go to Best Buy to pick one up: Apple will no longer be selling screen protectors — including protective cases and screen films — in either its online store or retail outlets starting in May

Both MacWorld and iLounge are saying that Apple is likely pulling screens in order to emphasize the durability of the forthcoming iPad… not exactly the sort of working theory that makes a lot of sense to anyone paying attention to the dozens of spiderweb cracked iPhone displays you might see in random strangers’ hands on any given day wandering around a big city.

An iLounge comment coming from an Apple Retail employee makes more sense: “I’m an Apple Retail employee who has applied roughly a million of these films. A couple months ago, it became our policy not to help apply them, because they’re so difficult to get perfect and it became a liability issue (“There’s a speck of dust, give me a new one free.”). Unless you’re in a vacuum, there’s a chance of picking up dust between opening the package and putting the film down”

That makes sense, but Apple’s banning more than just film here. John Gruber’s theory is that this is just a move to emphasize that Apple’s touchscreen devices are meant to be used as is. I think that’s the most compelling theory, but it’s also a joke: while Apple’s screens are about as durable as you can expect glass to be, they still crack pretty easily, and if you ever want to resell your device for a good price, a protective case is pretty much a must.

This isn’t likely to affect many people: iPhone cases are available pretty much at every big box retailer, and I doubt Apple declining to sell them through their various retail outlets is going to make much of a dent on the market. Still, it’s a rather bold and pig-headed move for Apple to take: while I don’t think anyone out there is denying they’d rather not have to use a case or film with their iPhone, the bottom line is that they are still a necessity, barring Apple’s perfection of force field technology.

Update: One of our commenters, an Apple store employee, has some interesting thoughts on the possible reasons behind the removal:

As an Apple store employee myself, I can confirm the ban on putting on the films. When we screw up the customers yell at us that we ruined the film and demand we return it and give them a new one. And half the time demand we put that one on also (even though we screwed up the last one). Also people coming in for repairs yell about the films on their old phones when they are replaced. Plus we typically have 5 shoplifted for every one that we sell…

This comes down to one of several possibles.

DON'T MISS
Apple To Sell Distribute Film Exclusively Through iTunes

1. the next iphone and touch will use screens that don’t need the films and/or negate the film attachment

2. this is just bitter pills from smaller companies that were rejected for space in the stores

3. my vote for most likely: Lower selling items are being cut from the stores due to a need for display and stock room space for ipad accessories most of which will hit later in April. These films and cases are part of that lower selling collection.

About the author

John BrownleeJohn Brownlee is news editor here at Cult of Mac, and has also written about a lot of things for a lot of different places, including Wired, Playboy, Boing Boing, Popular Mechanics, Gizmodo, Kotaku, Lifehacker, AMC, Geek and the Consumerist. He lives in Cambridge with his charming inamorata and a tiny budgerigar punningly christened after Nabokov's most famous pervert. You can follow him here on Twitter.

(sorry, you need Javascript to see this e-mail address)| Read more posts by .

Posted in News |

  • http://twitter.com/vanmacguy Vanmacguy

    I’m still trying to figure out what “This isn’t unlikely to affect many people:” actually means?

    Seriously, I’ve always worn my iPhones au natural, had a screen skin once and didn’t like it. So it doesn’t bother me. I think it’s petty of Apple though, if people want them – which they clearly do – they should sell them.

    Isn’t that what a store is supposed to be?

  • http://ihbs.co.uk Ben

    the last case i had on my iphone actually damaged it, so i dont bother with any kind of protective casing anymore, and just put that little bit more extra care into my iphone!

    I used to use an inCase case, featured in the apple store at the time, and it fits so snuggly, that it actually scratched the back of the iphone. So after months of using it, there were several train track like scratches, that were actually quite deep!

  • http://web.me.com/giosaccone GioSaccone

    There is no need for this type of protector. The glass is hugely resilient and can be cleaned with glasses cleaner.

  • http://www.metrokids.ca Conrad

    John, the more I read your stuff, the more I think you should be writing for Engadget or Gizmodo.

  • lizardliquer

    Undoubtedly brought to you by some lawsuit because the “protector” didn’t save someones iPod from the crush of a D8 Cat. Self protections are the armor of big corps.

  • JR

    those films don’t do crap against cracking. if you drop the phone and the screen cracks you just have a cracked screen with a film on it. the only plus is that it acts as a bandaid.

    As an Apple store employee myself, I can confirm the ban on putting on the films. When we screw up the customers yell at us that we ruined the film and demand we return it and give them a new one. And half the time demand we put that one on also (even though we screwed up the last one). Also people coming in for repairs yell about the films on their old phones when they are replaced. Plus we typically have 5 shoplifted for every one that we sell.

    Also the headline is wrong. it implies that the items are gone. they are not. go to the online store and search for Power Support (the company that provides 95% of the films we sell). it’s all still there.

    This comes down to one of several possibles.

    1. the next iphone and touch will use screens that don’t need the films and/or negate the film attachment
    2. this is just bitter pills from smaller companies that were rejected for space in the stores
    3. my vote for most likely: Lower selling items are being cut from the stores due to a need for display and stock room space for ipad accessories most of which will hit later in April. These films and cases are part of that lower selling collection.

  • Don Pope

    Those screen protectors are worthless. They don’t prevent cracks. They might prevent a scratch, but I’ve never seen a scratched iPod screen anyway. They also make the screen look dull.

  • Kyle

    ive never bought a case or screen protector from apple anyway.

    i tend to get my cases from the manufacture of the case (have an incipio feather now) and I don’t use a screen protector so this doesn’t matter to me

  • jakethasnake919

    I have never bought or plan to buy a case or screen protector for my iPod Touch 1st gen, but I will say that just carrying it around in my pocket has really scratched the screen up. This may have been protected by a screen protector but I don’t know. I think JR has it right in saying that they are trying to make more room. The Apple stores in North Carolina at least are relatively small and are already pushed for display space and I doubt that they have a ton of space in the back either.

  • Nathan

    I know I might be one of the only ones saying this but.. I am sad to see them leaving. I ONLY buy my cases at the apple store I HATE the cheap cases other retailers carry else where. I always keep a case and screen protector on my iPhone. I am sad to see them go… Now apple I have to break the news to my lil iPhone…. No more case shopping at apple…. :(

  • Proto732

    Personally I really like the anti-glare protector on mine. Helps a lot with outside use.

    Anyone think this might be because iPhone 4 will have a different screen size and to eliminate confusion they are just doing away with them altogether?