Apple’s China Supplier Foxconn Roughs Up Reporter

Apple’s China Supplier Foxconn Roughs Up Reporter

A dormitory at Foxconn's factory city in Shenzhen.

Apple’s love of keeping a lid on product details before officially unveiled is not a secret. Now comes word that demand for secrecy has spread throughout Apple’s supply-chain, including its most prominent, China’s Foxconn. The supplier went so far as to rough-up a reporter investigating the company’s Guanlan, China factory.

After a Reuters reporter began taking photos outside the factory, Foxconn guards grabbed him and tried to drag him into the factory. Police later told the reporter: “This is Foxconn and they have a special status here. Please understand.”

In 2009, a Foxconn worker committed suicide, jumping off a dormitory at the Taiwa-based company’s Shenzhen, China factory following reportedly being interrogated by Foxconn security. The worker, Sun Danyong, 25, was being blamed for allegedly stealing an iPhone prototype. The worker’s family was later given $44,000 and a MacBook in compensation.

Three year before the suicide, Foxconn sued two Chinese reporters, asking for $4.4 million, after the duo revealed substandard working conditions.

Although Apple has said its requires suppliers to “treat all workers with dignity and respect,” a 2009 report by Apple found more than half of its partner factories in China did not fairly pay workers and 23 of 83 factories checked failed to even pay China’s minimum wage.

Foxconn’s behavior may be an extreme example of the lengths companies will go to retain lucrative contracts with Apple. Such contracts are laced with confidentiality requirements, including fines for companies believed to have leaked product information. Apple will often pick a supplier just weeks before a new product is unveiled, provide fake products and divide the work among multiple companies to lessen the chance of leaks.

For workers, Apple’s insistence on tight security sometimes means passing through metal detectors and frustration over the Cupertino, Calif. firm asking for unique designs that after being manufactured cannot be used elsewhere.

DON'T MISS
Suicides and Poisonings at Apple’s Chinese Manufacturers Provoke Calls for Investigation

[Via AppleInsider, Fortune and Reuters]

About the author

Ed Sutherland

Ed Sutherland is a veteran technology journalist who first heard of Apple when they grew on trees, Yahoo was run out of a Stanford dorm and Google was an unknown upstart. Since then, Sutherland has covered the whole technology landscape, concentrating on tracking the trends and figuring out the finances of large (and small) technology companies.

(sorry, you need Javascript to see this e-mail address)| Read more posts by .

Posted in News |

  • http://www.nabeelakhtar.net Reader

    So black diamonds are bad… but Mac is good… right?

  • Alfred

    >> a 2009 report by Apple found more than half of its partner factories in China did not fairly pay workers and 23 of 83 factories checked failed to even pay China’s minimum wage.

    WOW.

    Why isn’t there more outcry against this?

  • MacRat

    I bet Walmart pays less.

    Also keep in mind that large factories are like a college campus. In addition to that salary, you are also getting a free room, free meals and free health care.

    The press constantly focusing on just the “salary” is deceptive.

  • shaunathan

    MacRat has a VERY valid point. But they should at least be paying the people’s wage.

  • Drew Caster

    Foxconn also manufactures for HP, Dell, Microsoft and just about everyone else. Why are they always referred to as if they were an Apple subsidiary? It can’t be just for the sensationalism? Can it? Oh….

  • Elias

    does the manufactured product in foxconn has less in quality then the U.S made product ?? (mainely for apple products)

  • http://www.chinesefactorysourcing.com China Factory

    It’s time for these companies to take responsibility for their wrongdoings! Sadly one cannot blame Apple, or should we? If they do not purchase from these factories.. Less workers would be treated badly, but would their lives be better unemployed?

    Daniel
    -CFS