NYT: Apple Tablet to require “complex new vocabulary” of gestures, include iWork

NYT: Apple Tablet to require “complex new vocabulary” of gestures, include iWork

In a profile piece on the sudden surge of “slate-like” tablet computers that took CES by storm (which, with few exceptions, already managed to seem like also-rans compared to Apple’s still unannounced and unreleased tablet), the New York Times claims that Apple has been working on a multi-touch capable version of the iWork suite for the last few years.

That’s interesting, no doubt, but the New York Times goes on. According to the newspaper, “conversations with several former Apple engineers” who claim to have had a role in the creation of the device, the Apple Tablet’s multi-touch interface requires a “somewhat complex new vocabulary of finger gestures to control it, making use of technology it acquired in the 2007
purchase of a company called FingerWorks.” Sound familar?

“The tablet should offer any number of unique multitouch experiences — for example, three fingers down and rotate could mean ‘open an application,’ ” one former Apple engineer reportedly said.

DON'T MISS
Fingerworks.com shuttered by Apple before Tablet announcement

The New York Times jumps to the conclusion that the combination of a steep interface learning curve and a multi-touch iWork suite means that Apple’s tablet is meant to be a “fully functional computer, rather than a more passive device for reading books and watching movies.” Possibly, but that’s the tack that the PC world has taken with tablets for years, and they’ve never caught on. Apple’s got to have a lot more up its sleeve than just a gesture-controlled tablet.

About the author

John BrownleeJohn Brownlee is news editor here at Cult of Mac, and has also written about a lot of things for a lot of different places, including Wired, Playboy, Boing Boing, Popular Mechanics, Gizmodo, Kotaku, Lifehacker, AMC, Geek and the Consumerist. He lives in Cambridge with his charming inamorata and a tiny budgerigar punningly christened after Nabokov's most famous pervert. You can follow him here on Twitter.

(sorry, you need Javascript to see this e-mail address)| Read more posts by .

Posted in Apple Tablet, News, Top stories |

  • Mike

    Is there a link to the original NYT post?

  • CaryMG

    I’m getting more & more excited by the day ….

    The podcast better be up tout suite.

  • Mike

    I found the original article:
    http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/09/technology/personaltech/09reader.html

    In the future you should post a link when you are reporting on another article.

  • Michael

    “Possibly, but that’s the tack that the PC world has taken with tablets for years, and they’ve never caught on.”

    That’s because they offered very little more than what a regular laptop offered. If Microsoft wasn’t tied to pushing Windows, they would’ve attempted to design something that actually made a difference. They couldn’t do that though, they’re more interested in increasing and holding onto their monopoly. Creating a new platform that was within reach of the casual consumer, could potentially break their Windows monopoly allowing major market fragmentation and others to enter and compete. Which is exactly what they set out to destroy a decade earlier.

  • http://www.mr2.org.nz John

    It may be amazing, and expensive as heell, or pretty average and cheap. Knowing Apple, they dont care about it being cheap, they play in the top 10%.

    Most expensive desktop PC – iMac27″
    Most expensive mini computer, Mac Mini
    Most expensive 17″ Laptop, Macbook Pro
    Most expensive Netbook – Macbook Air

    If you look at the un subsidised price of an iPhone3GS, it is still a pretty expensive phone NZ$1200 here, but only $500 on a moderate $100 a month plan (meaning you pay $2900 for it overall)

  • Mattzook

    I just hope they change the name back to ClarisWorks. Hehe those were the good old days.

    Moof!

  • Camperton

    @ Mike

    Way to do Brownlee’s job for him.