In explaining how Apple keeps products secret, Gizmodo compares Apple to Nazi Germany

500x_apple-gestapo

Gizmodo’s Jesus Diaz wouldn’t recognize an understated argument if it politely coughed, tapped him on the shoulder, and then promptly blew his face off with a bazooka, so it’s no surprise that his latest post about the so-called “Apple Gestapo” Godwin’s itself from the start. It’s a hysterical and stupid overreaction to the practices Cupertino employs to maintain secrecy about upcoming products.

But even so, it’s worth a gander, because while Diaz’s interpretations of Apple’s procedures are utterly facile, it’s still a rare and unique look at exactly how Apple manages to keep some of the most widely anticipated products in the consumer electronic market quiet, year after year.

According to Gizmodo’s tipster, when Apple suspects a department of leaking new developments, they deploy the “Worldwide Loyalty Team” to investigate. Once deployed, the Worldwide Loyalty Walks into a department and informs the manager, who instructs all employees to stay at their desks. All cell phones are then confiscated department wide; if it’s an iPhone, its data is quickly backed up to a laptop, while if it’s another brand of phone, it is manually inspected. Employees are not allowed to use their computers during this time, or place any outgoing calls. If the Worldwide Loyalty Team confirms that an employee is leaking product details, they are asked to stay until the end of the day, then quietly escorted from the building by security.

Okay, we’ll admit it: this sounds a bit Draconian. But let’s keep something in mind. Apple employees almost certainly give Apple explicit permission to do all of this when they sign their employee contracts. You sign your privacy away during work hours when you get a job at Apple. If you don’t want to give up your cell phone privacy when you step through Apple’s doors, you go work for another company.

This doesn’t even sound that out-of-line with what I’ve heard happens at other big tech companies working on secret projects when internal leaks are suspected. Keeping news about upcoming products from leaking early — thus giving competitors time to react — is serious business, after all.

Do I think this is the way an office should work? I don’t. It’s why I would never work for a company that wanted me to sign a contract giving them the right to search my cell phone. I think it’s reprehensible… and if Diaz had said just that, I would have agreed with him.

DON'T MISS
Survey: iPhone Owners Are Most Loyal Smartphone Users

Predictably, though, Diaz takes it way too far: “[This feels] like a description of the Gestapo, without the torture and killing part,” he writes.

LOL. What? Let me rephrase that just to make the absurdity crystal clear. In other words, Diaz is saying that Apple is exactly like Nazi Germany, except without all the genocide or persecution or attempt at world domination or political adherence to national socialism or any of the other things that anyone thinks about when they talk about the Third Reich. No, he’s just talking the part where Nazi Germany sometimes wanted to take a look at your text message history.

What the heck was your point again, Jesus?

About the author

John BrownleeJohn Brownlee is news editor here at Cult of Mac, and has also written about a lot of things for a lot of different places, including Wired, Playboy, Boing Boing, Popular Mechanics, Gizmodo, Kotaku, Lifehacker, AMC, Geek and the Consumerist. He lives in Cambridge with his charming inamorata and a tiny budgerigar punningly christened after Nabokov's most famous pervert. You can follow him here on Twitter.

(sorry, you need Javascript to see this e-mail address)| Read more posts by .

Posted in Apple, iPhone, News |

  • Camillo

    No, he’s just talking the part where Nazi Germany sometimes wanted to take a look at your text message history.

    ahahahahahahahahahahahahahah

  • http://www.mackozer.pl MacKozer

    not mentioning corporate practices to prevent information leaking, the whole article of Jesus Diaz is an insult to the all victims of Nazi German secret police – GESTAPO and it is a clear example of blurring the history.

    GESTAPO operated in Germany and all occupied countries, including my own – Poland, killed millions of people and it was in charge of concentration camps.

    I’m writing it from the heart of the former Litzmannstadt ghetto (city of Lodz), where Jack Tramiel (founder of Commodore) spent 5 years. The Gestapo headquarters in the ghetto was the regular killing place.

    The comparison done by Diaz is disgusting. No body could walk free from the conentration camp, ghetto or occupied country. No body applied to get in either (as one does to get a job).

  • http://www.technovia.co.uk Ian Betteridge

    You’re right. Draconian, yes. Gestapo – is he on crack?

  • Matt

    Maybe Mr. Diaz needs to take a walk through the Holocaust Museum in Washington DC (or any other) before he casually compares anything to Nazi’s.

  • Sean

    You fail to realize though this private company is violating the constitution. IF you have ever read the document you would understand. Instead of ripping down the people at gizmodo you should look into he was not saying apple is nazi germany, but there policies in regards to employees draw similarties to the gestapo

  • Nico

    haha getting so worked up about apple bashing I see? (oh i forgot this is an apple cult blog). Every writer has some sort of exaggeration but yea comparing apple to nazi may be crossing the line. BUT if you read gizmodo daily, they always make comparison or gestures or whatever to grab readers attention. But o well, just my opinion. That doesn’t offend me.

  • Ray Steinbeck

    Diaz should be reported to the Jewish Anti-Defamation League. Using the Holocaust comparison is insulting to millions of Jewish people.

  • Highway

    Wayyyyyyyyy to Fail !!!, that guy is a complete a utter retard.

  • Don Pope

    Yes, the comparison is quite an overstatement, but getting offended by it is going a bit too far.

  • John

    What the hell is wrong with you people? Let Jesus have HIS FREEDOM OF SPEECH. If you don’t like it, get off the website!

    People have nothing better to do than nitpick all of the time! I had to get that out!

  • delphinus87

    jesus christ guys, he wasn’t saying “HAHA Apple’s exactly like Nazi Germany and LOL at the Holocaust!”. he was comparing how the Apple “Loyalty Team” are all powerful against Apple employees, comparable to how the Gestapo had powers over all citizens of germany. It’s a valid comparison, which is being blown out of proportion by this article.

    It’s also not mentioned how Jesus Diaz never made the comparison himself.
    “They call themselves the Worldwide Loyalty Team. Among some employees, they are known as the Apple Gestapo…”

    granted he also admits he agrees with the comparison
    “I read what he had to say. It felt like a description of the Gestapo, without the torture and killing part.”
    You too say you agree with the comparison, John

    BTW, it’s an 1100 word article, and if there’s any form of vague reference to the Nazi’s, it’s in the first 11 sentences. As far as being controversial, this is light for Jesus’s usual articles.

    and no brashing me for pro-nazi semantics either. I’m just speaking my mind

  • delphinus87

    I’m just restating a fact that people seem to want to ignore

    JESUS DID NOT MAKE THE COMPARISON HIMSELF!

    Calling then the “Apple Gestapo” was coined by Apple employees, not Jesus. He only agreed with the comparison, which you did as well, John.

    rtfa

  • Stephen R. Stapleton

    I am not entirely convinced one could sign an employment contract that permitted this kind of behavior. I think most courts would find the clause unconscionable. While the merchant exception would allow Apple to hold an employee for about 15 minutes while the conducted a search, I don’t think the courts have looked pleasantly upon holding large groups of people for hours without specific suspicion against each and every one of them (suspicion against the department as a whole would unlikely be sufficient). If Apple were to behave this way and given its deep pockets, I believe they’d have at least one lawsuit against them for false imprisonment. Threatening someone with the loss of their job to keep them in a bounded area against their will for any length of time would qualify as the tort of false imprisonment, IMHO.

    Thus, I suspect the account of the Worldwide Loyalty Team to uncredible.

  • Sadie Morrison

    I find it funny that one of the above commenters apparently doesn’t know the difference between rightfully criticizing something that’s in incredibly poor taste and violating someone’s freedom of speech. By that commenter’s logic, he’s just violated John Brownlee’s freedom of speech.

    And yes, Diaz’ comparison was disgusting and in need of condemnation.

  • Whatever

    Hush emo bloggers.
    Also
    “If you don’t want to give up your cell phone privacy when you step through Apple’s doors, you go work for another company.”
    Well believe it or not, Ripley, but some countries have laws against that. Contracts are not above the laws nor are private companies, it’s not a matter of liking the wallpaper of your cubicle, moron.