NY Times Blames iPhone for AT&T Woes, Courtesy of AT&T Consultants

NY Times Blames iPhone for AT&T Woes, Courtesy of AT&T Consultants

Everyone knows that the one thing holding the iPhone back in the U.S. is AT&T’s poor 3G coverage, right? With a dropped signal, it can transform from one of the world’s most capable mobile computers to a video iPod that plays a pretty mean version of Doom. Everyone knows the problem lies with the network’s inability to handle iPhone data traffic, as iPhones have no such problems in the European market, Japan, and other regions where it has a major foothold — places where the network load is so much not a problem that they enable data tethering from laptops.

Well, everyone knows but the New York Times and the mobile industry analysts — some of whom work for AT&T — they interviewed about the matter. In a dreadful column titled “AT&T Takes the Blame, Even for iPhone’s Faults“, one of the paper’s correspondents in Silicon Valley, Randall Stross, goes so far as to definitively declare that the iPhone’s design “is contributing to performance problems” and that with regard to Verizon, “AT&T has the superior network nationwide.” Oh, for crying out loud.

The article has brought down the Apple blogosphere’s derision, most notably John Gruber, who trashes Stross with, you know, facts, such as the fact that the chief source of the story is a paid network consultant of AT&T’s or that one of the other sources tests network strength and individual phone performance with software that won’t run on iPhones. Their hypothesis, that the iPhone has secret phone networking problems, are excellent, so long as you don’t consider that they aren’t grounded on supporting data from unbiased sources.

What’s most remarkable to me about all of this is how obviously manipulated the statistics are to make AT&T look better than Verizon. In one instance, Paul Carter of Global Wireless Solutions (which works for AT&T) notes that AT&T’s network throughput is “40 to 50 percent higher than the competition, including Verizon.” Sure, but no one denies that the maximum speed of AT&T 3G isn’t faster than CDMA. They complain that AT&T often lacks coverage of any kind, drops calls, and slips into EDGE for no apparent reason. Also, “the competition, including Verizon,” in no way shows what is being compared. Is that relative to just Verizon, or is “the competition” an average of Sprint, T-Mobile, and Verizon? The fact that T-Mobile didn’t have 3G of any kind until a year ago would certainly drag that average down.

So some of the data from Root Wireless (though not measuring iPhone performance) sounds more convincing until you consider the phrasing: “In every market, AT&T had faster average download speeds and had signal strength of 75 percent or better more frequently than did Verizon.” Again, average download speeds are irrelevant. The second piece of data sounds significant, until you realize that what really matters is which network has no signal at all more frequently. And I’m quite confident AT&T would win that race.

Finally, it cracks me up that the only person willing to come out and claim that there is a problem with the iPhone’s air interface, the part that talks with cell phone towers, is Roger Entner, an SVP of Nielsen, who doesn’t have a technical background. According to his blog, he has an MBA and a BA. So, unless you think that a marketing analyst knows more about phone engineering than, well, actual engineers, this is hardly a credible comment.

DON'T MISS

Finally, just take a step back. Has AT&T’s network ever been good? My wife has had both a BlackBerry and a Centro on AT&T, and coverage has been worse for her than it has been for my iPhone 3GS. If anything, the iPhone usually makes it better. Either way, I cannot see any evidence that, as Stross recommends, “AT&T, send some engineers to redesign the iPhone to make better use of the country’s fastest wireless network.”

Do any of you think Apple is somehow secretly to blame? Really?

About the author

Petemortensen

Pete Mortensen is a design strategist for consulting firm Jump Associates and the co-author of Wired to Care: How Companies Prosper When They Create Widespread Empathy, a book and blog that are significantly more interesting than you might initially think. Pete's particular Apple avocations are both around design--interface and industrial. Follow him on Twitter!

(sorry, you need Javascript to see this e-mail address)| Read more posts by .

Posted in iPhone, Opinions, Top stories |

  • Garfield

    The only thing you can blame apple for in this case is the exclusive deal with AT&T. In most other markets outside of the US the iPhone is available through more than one carrier. This obviously helps distribute the load on the network resulting in better customer experience & service. If Apple wants to make things better for it’s customers then they need to end the AT&T exclusivity and fast. We all know that AT&T is not going to get off their mammoth behind and do something about their network anytime soon.

  • Andrew

    I really enjoy my AT&T service. I get good 3G coverage and good data speeds. I’m sorry that there are people who aren’t as fortunate, but they need to stop acting like they are representative of AT&T’s entire user base. You only hear the complaints because people with great service don’t need to say anything! Complainers just love to blow this all out of proportion; they do not speak for the rest of us.

  • Bruce

    I’ve had AT&T for two years now and currently own a 3gs. I had verison prior to AT&T and can tell you that I am happier with AT&T service and quality. billing was terrible with verizon, costumer service horrid and signal was no better then AT&T. I’ve had cases where a verizon user has no signal but I do. how does one explain that?

  • Glenn

    I live in an area of Oklahoma not covered by either Verizon or AT&T. Both hold licenses but neither has ever built towers of their own to cover this area. Two other GSM carriers (CellularOne and T-Mobile) have plenty of towers (8 within 7 miles of here) but AT&T cannot roam on any of them. One CDMA carrier (Pioneer Cellular) has lots of towers (7 in the county) as well, but neither Verizon nor Sprint is allowed to sell or roam in this Oklahoma Market Area, RSA-5. Seems to me a good part of this whole problem is related to FCC regulations in the end.

  • Um no

    Andrew, I receive lousy service in San Francisco, with calls generally dropping when I crest a hill, or any time AT&T’s crappy network decides to drop them. Your comment indicates that AT&T certainly has good coverage somewhere– how fortunate for you!– but you need to stop acting like YOU are representative of AT&T’s entire user base. Satisfied people like you just love to accuse people of blowing this all out of proportion; they do not speak for the rest of us!!

  • Clown

    I read the AT&T traffic increased by 5000% since the release of the iPhone. If that’s true, then technically, the iPhone may be responsible in an indirect way. Let’s see how Verizon handles that kind of traffic.

  • k-one

    i never understand the AT&T bashing. I drive from CT to Maine and everywhere in between pretty often and in the 2.5 years i’ve had the iphone, then the 3GS with AT&T, I have never had any issues. i get really confused when i read such things.

  • MitchNYC

    AT&T/Cingular’s network was never a thing of beauty. Before the iPhone, I owned a Sony Ericsson and a Nokia – known for their connectivity – and both of them had connection issues not unlike what I experience with my iPhone. In fact, I thought the 1G iPhone had a BETTER connection than my previous phones. It’s certainly gone downhill from there.

    I live in NY where the dead zones have improved slightly but are still far too prevalent. I drop every other call and sometimes have difficulty making calls during ‘rush hour,’ which is basically when kids get out of school at 3pm through 7pm. I arrived in San Francisco last week Thursday to find that the network was down on Friday and sketchy the rest of the weekend. I’m about to head to Phoenix where my phone only works in half of my Mom’s house in the middle of the city. Again, this is no different than my Nokia and happens to everyone I know.

    I would say 75% of my friends have iPhones and we all have the same problems. So Andrew, I think you are part of the silent minority, not the silent majority. I think the people who are complaining are actually more fed up, not more demanding.

  • Michael

    AT&T’s coverage holding the iPhone back….. ROTFLOL

    iPhone is holding AT&T back…

    a shitty device, that fucks the 3G network, everytime it goes in compress mode

    This have been documented by several operators

  • Michael

    and is it me or does the rainbow from the book

    Inside Steve’s Brain http://www.cultofmac.com/ads/20091114-stevesbrainadfinal.png

    look very similar to the Gay pride flag http://www.crwflags.com/fotw/images/s/sex-rb.gif

  • Jimmy

    Perfectly great, “full bars” 3G coverage here in the entire Birmingham, Al area. Same for when I travel to Ft. Myers, Fl and Las Vegas, Nv. No dropped calls, nada…

  • Neil

    My Job as an electronic security consultant requires my travel in all parts of the country as well as travel abroad. Over the years my company has been with Nextel, Sprint, Verizon and now AT&T for last 2.5 years. Honestly I have found no discernible difference in any of the networks. Obviously there are going to be areas where on network is better represented than others but it varies by the myriad combination’s of geographic location and carrier.

    “Just my 2 cents”

  • Tim

    Stop whining and switch companies. Seriously SHUT UP!! Got ATT here in Seattle and it kicks Verizons ASS UP AND DOWN THE STREET in buildings and everywhere else!! If you don’t like it stop paying for it. Seriously to the responsible people of the world the verizon map ad campaign and all the people that complain on blogs about their ATT coverage sound like a bunch of feminized victims! Go get a s&i**y CDMA phone and get down with your bad self. Verizon has more coverage but they don’t have as much bandwidth. Go live in your dial up era while I smile and live in my broadband world. PS there are places in the world where people don’t have running water so no one is ever going to feel bad that some pu**y can’t get cell service somewhere.

  • Site7000

    Michael: Thank you for your second message. It makes it completely unnecessary for anyone to bother responding to your first message.

  • MacPro

    I have a legal unlocked iPhone 3GS. I use it on T-mobile, At&t, Rogers, Bell, Swisscom, Orange, and Soft bank. I use it because as a Business owner, It provides me access to all that I need. In regards to all that I need, yes it works better in every other country outside the U.S. Are there flaws with the device, of course, all devices have flaws. Are there At&t networks problems? ABSOLUTELY! I love the way the device works when I AM NOT AT HOME!!

  • gq330

    I used to hate AT&T. When I moved to the town I had Verizon and it stunk. I like the iPhone and with a grudge towards AT&T that would make the Spartans smile I went ahead and took the kool-aid. It has been nothing but a pleasant experience. I never drop calls and love the iPhone. My attitude about all the telcos is that they are crooks but in fairness AT&T has gotten better – at least in my case.

  • MSL

    I’m gonna throw up from all this cellular provider whining! Cry babies!

    NO provider is perfect or better than the other. Argue all you want, but you will find people that disagree with you and will slap the facts down on you.

    Also, I don’t buy into the advertisements. Do you? Well, do you??

  • Hildonen

    I have had mobile phones since 1995 and I have only experienced dropped calls while travelling through a tunnel. I have had several brands and models and I have lived in Finland, Portugal, Brazil and Norway during that period. I currently have an iPhone and the reception is excellent and so is the sound quality. And I have never had a dropped call. Of course not. Seems to me that the problem is US-specific. If we move way out in the wilderness, you find areas with poor or no coverage, but they are rare. Inside factories, you might have problems as well. iPhone works well here and so do every other phone. I think that should indicate that it is something wrong with AT&T and not the phones, neither the iPhone nor any other.

  • Michael

    Thanks Tim for your thoughts. You took words from my mouth. But to add. Remember people the iPhone changed the industry. It brought what was considered a business platform to the consumer and made it a HELL OF A LOT BETTER. I have the iPhone in new Orleans and great service, great customer service, and fast network speed ( since I only have 1.5 download at my house, I use the 3G network and usually get around 1.5 to 2 download). Also I have seen speeds as high as 3Mb. Also remember Apple went to Verizon first. They were too stupid to see a GREAT THING!! AT&T saw it and now they getting the benefits. Of course this comes at a price since it draws also negative attention to AT&T also. CDMA is a older “American” technology that even Verizon is about to abandon. GSM is fairly new in the states and will take time to get better. But rest assure it will get better!!! Again to agree with Tim, if you not happy, SWITCH!!! MOVE ON AND KEEP YOUR TROLLING TO YOUSELF BECAUSE YOU DONT SPEEK FOR THE ALL IF US!!!

  • Brian

    @Michael

    It’s just you.

  • Micheal

    Sorry for some of my typos, but I also wanted to add. AT&T is doing a lot to improve it’s network. They have bought new spectrums and are releasing a sort of 3G plus network that will deliver speeds up to 7.2Mb download. The iPhone is a “data hog” for sure and AT&T knows this best! They are living it!! As glad as I am to see AT&T got the iPhone, I would love to know just how verizon would have done with it!! Oh wait I am sure Verizon would have crippled it like they do all their phones. Maybe verizon will learn a little from AT&T and Apple by not trying to have so much control.

  • Micheal

    @Brian. Just me? Please all my family and friends have AT&T iPhone and some not the iPhone and all are very happy. Some live here in New Orleans, some in Houston and Dallas, some in Atlanta and some in Florida. Of those others have had Verizon and Sprint and all they say is that the service or customer service was no better or worst. Many long AT&T users have said they have noticed better service on both. Look the carriers all have there pros and cons. It’s just I get tired of reading all the negative press about AT&T and the iPhone. It’s like the rest of the industry has this jealously about them. I just thought maybe it would make since for those of us that are happy with AT&T and the iPhone to speak up. And for those of you who switch to AT&T and the iPhone and hate your experiece, my question to you is: Did you do your homework before you bought? Before I buy anything I research it. I am sure most of you do the sane before you buy that new receiver or whatever. This should have been no different.

  • http://ottodestruct.com Otto

    It is different in different areas. In Memphis for example, AT&T is so much better than the other guys that it’s not even really a competition. 3G coverage is solid and ubiquitous in town (not as great inside some older buildings, however), and speeds are phenomenal. It’s solid as heck.

    However, I went to Atlanta a while back, and noticed the crap quality of the signal and speeds there.

    So it really does depend on the market. AT&T has good coverage, but the problem is that they don’t seem to design for reasonable population density.

    The thing about Verizon’s map that bugs me the most is that large amount of red in all the farm country. While I imaging they care about that up there, I certainly do not. I’m never in Montana, why should I give a shit about their level of service? Coverage maps are a losers game. I’m interested in quality, not coverage.

  • Tyromind

    I used to have Verizon, but switched for the iPhone. I never liked Verizon as a company, but I always had better reception with them. Also I didn’t have an iPhone immediatly when I switched, so it’s not just the iPhone causig problems. Had same issues with a samsung.

  • http://www.fort90.com/journal/ fort90

    First off, to the original author: dude, it’s fucking New York Times. They kinda don’t know what they’re talking about 95% of the time.

    As for some of the rest of you, as much I hate whiny Apple/iPhone fanboys, I just wish people who have excellent AT&T service would just shut up. It’s akin to going to a hospital waiting room and proclaiming how great it is to not have a cold/suffer from a broken bone.

    You have no problems. Well isn’t that special. Not sure what reaction you’re all looking for. Are we supposed to be jealous or something.

    People who gripe have good reason to, and it’s not just as simple as switching carriers. We’re pissed because we’re getting ripped off and the options are unfortunately few and far between.

    That being said, if the iPhone was on another network, the same problems might exist, it’s hard to say (then again, every single of my hardcore BlackBerry using friends are on Verizon and not once have I heard a complaint… anecdotal to say the least, I know).

    Also, to the guy who tries to point out that there’s starving children in Africa: seriously, is that how you act in every argument? Cuz that’s pretty grade-A douchey. Just saying.

  • Adam

    Disappointing. Mr. Mortenson complains about AT&T offering no facts or data in an article where he presents no facts or data.

  • JM

    Pot. Kettle. Black. Regardless of how you feel about Verizon/AT&T/Apple, this post is sensational trash.

    I agree with Adam. Pete complains about the NY Times piece and how they can’t get data from AT&T, yet has none to offer himself. The Times shares data from 3 independent sources and discloses that *ONE* of them does business with AT&T. Mr. Mortenson glosses this over and irresponsibly implies that all of the sources are AT&T vendors. He makes a lot of emotional rants, ad hominems, and calls to emotion but offers on evidence. He even has the audacity to rip a Nielsen analyst as “not being an engineer”. And what are Pete’s creds? Degrees in English Literature and Journalism from Northwestern.

    Pete Mortenson, you’re a hack and a hypocrite.

  • Stephen

    I live in the UK, and while I can’t comment on the quality of the AT&T network in the US, I can say that my iPhone 3G is significantly worse at recieving weak signals than my backup handset (LG GB102), which I am forced to use instead. Whilst the LG gets a moderate signal strength around the area that I live and work, the iPhone gets no signal at all. This is true of two networks (O2 and Vodaphone) that I have tested it on.

    I believe that reception problems vary from handset to handset, since there are people around me in the office who do get reception on iPhones on the same network. However, there are enough reprots of the same problem on the internet that it has to be a significant problem, even if only for a vocal minority.

    Although my methods are not especially scientific, two handsets side by side with the same SIM on the same network, one with a two bar signal and one with no signal, is pretty damning.

    Whilst AT&T may well be a weak US network, it’s problems will be exacerbated by design or manufacturing faults in a significant proportion of Apple handsets.