Foxconn Prepares For Life After Apple

iphone-5-foxconn

Foxconn has been forced to make preparations for life after Apple following reduced demand for the iPhone and other iOS devices which has caused the company’s revenue to nosedive, The New York Times reports.

The manufacturer has been doing well off the back of Apple’s hugely successful devices in recent years, which have been contributing at least 40% of its revenue, according to analyst estimates. But after suffering a 19.2% drop in revenue during the first quarter of the year, thanks to declining iPhone and iPad orders, Foxconn is now looking at ways in which it can be less reliant on Apple.

Foxconn also manufactures products for Amazon, Dell, HP, Nokia, Sony, and a whole host of other electronics companies. But Apple’s success with the iPhone and the iPad has led to the Cupertino company becoming Foxconn’s biggest customer, and Foxconn has become reliant on all that revenue.

But it’s now looking at new ways in which it can grow in an effort to reduce the affects of decreasing demand for Apple’s products.

“Foxconn senses that the Apple aura isn’t as invincible as before,” Jamie Wang, an analyst at the research firm Gartner, told NYT. “So they are worried that they need something besides Apple’s business that will allow them to grow.”

One of Foxconn’s moves has been to manufacture its own products. The company have begun designing its own televisions, which it has been selling under the RadioShack brand in Canada, and the Vizio brand in the U.S. Foxconn even invested a whopping $840 million on a 37.6% stake in Sharp to secure its large LCD panels.

However, as companies like Samsung, Sony, and LG know too well, it’s hard to make money from TVs. Worldwide demand for LCD TVs declined 1% in 2012 compared with the previous year, and demand for all TVs fell 6%, according to NPD DisplaySearch.

Foxconn has only sold around 20,000 sets in Taiwan so far, according to a company spokesman. But the company is working with cable and Internet TV operators in Taiwan and China to offer subsidized TV sets that cost a lot less upfront when bought with a subscription.

For example, customers can buy a 60-inch TV for as little as 33,800 Taiwan dollars ($1.150), as long as they agree to also pay 1,158 Taiwan dollars a month for a two-year TV service contract. It’s just like buying a subsidized smartphone.

The problem with manufacturing TVs is that Foxconn ends up competing with its own customers. Some analysts say that the company has two contradictory goals. On one hand, it doesn’t want to compete with the likes of Sony, Sharp, and Toshiba, because it has TV assembly orders from them. On the other hand, it has excess LCD panels produced by Sharp that need to be used up.

“So what do you do in the meantime after spending about $840 million buying a plant?” said Thompson Wu, an analyst at Credit Suisse. “You just say, I have to decide whether I’m better off making TVs at a discount and make less money incrementally or having manufacturing not doing anything.”

Taiwanese companies do the all the time, according to Kirk Yang, managing director of Barclays’ Asia Technology Research. They sell products at a loss just to get started, but once they are selling large volumes, they eventually make a small profit.

But will there come a time when Sharp won’t have excess panels that need to be used up? Some analysts believe that Foxconn purchased its stake in Sharp in anticipation for Apple’s television set, which will almost certainly be manufactured by Foxconn — if it ever gets manufactured at all.

“Their gamble now is if Apple will put out a TV, and they should know better than anyone else in the world,” said Mr. Wu, the Credit Suisse analyst. “They’re making a bet that it’ll work.”

So, has Foxconn really prepared for life after Apple? Or has it simply prepared itself for Apple’s next big thing?

Related
  • scatteredthings

    What a bizarre article, Killian. Who is your editor?

    “Foxconn has been forced to make preparations for life after Apple following reduced demand for the iPhone and other iOS devices which has caused the company’s revenue to nosedive, The New York Times reports.”

    This is the most biased opening ever! Foxconn, like any sensible company, is looking to diversify it’s income. It hasn’t “been forced to make preparations for life after Apple” – they will presumably continue to manufacture for Apple. Instead of regurgitating the NYT article, why not critically analyse it. Who says iPhone demand is down? Compared to last year? Or compared to the ‘predictions’ of ‘analysts’? Apple itself says this: “Sales rose 18 percent to $54.5 billion in the fiscal quarter ended Dec. 29 from $46.3 billion a year ago.” (http://www.forbes.com/sites/connieguglielmo/2013/01/23/apples-holiday-sales-q2-forecast-miss-estimates-shares-fall-live/). They missed ESTIMATES… but their sales were still UP! So, I call bullsh*t on your opening premise (well, not yours, it’s the NYT’s, you’re just parroting it).

    “The manufacturer has been doing well off the back of Apple’s hugely successful devices in recent years, which have been contributing at least 40% of its revenue, according to analyst estimates.”

    That’s odd. The last article you had on this (http://www.cultofmac.com/222859/foxconn-sales-down-in-q1-2013-following-disappointing-iphone-demand/) said 60-70% of revenue… so which is it?

    “But after suffering a 19.2% drop in revenue during the first quarter of the year, thanks to declining iPhone and iPad orders, Foxconn is now looking at ways in which it can be less reliant on Apple.”

    That’s bizarre, because TechCrunch reports “Apple’s Q1 2013 Breaks iPhone And iPad Sales Records With 47.8M, 22.9M Units Sold Respectively” (http://techcrunch.com/2013/01/23/apple13q1-iphone-ipad-ipod/). So… why are iPhone and iPad orders declining?

    “But it’s now looking at new ways in which it can grow in an effort to reduce the affects of decreasing demand for Apple’s products.”

    No, there is not decreasing demand… there is still growing demand. The growth is just not at the insane pace that it was because the market is becoming saturated. PS. it’s effects.

    “Foxconn has only sold around 20,000 sets in Taiwan so far, according to a company spokesman.”

    OK, but I thought we were talking about the RadioShack and Vizio brands? How many have they sold in the USA or Europe? The Taiwan sales figures are hardly representative of the size of their TV business…

    “The problem with manufacturing TVs is that Foxconn ends up competing with its own customers. Some analysts say that the company has two contradictory goals. On one hand, it doesn’t want to compete with the likes of Sony, Sharp, and Toshiba, because it has TV assembly orders from them. On the other hand, it has excess LCD panels produced by Sharp that need to be used up.”

    If you’re going to plagiarise articles, at least plagiarise accurately. The NYT makes the point much better… you should have just quoted (their entire article): “But it needs to absorb excess LCD panels produced by the Sakai factory to take advantage of the lower manufacturing cost per unit.” (http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/07/business/global/foxconn-tries-to-move-beyond-apples-shadow.html?_r=3&adxnnl=1&partner=yahoofinance&pagewanted=2&adxnnlx=1367936805-Ok0boDsolicPJP3qOG8+HA). So the important point is that the excess panels allow them to keep the cost of manufacturing per panel down. From your article, the reader is left wondering why there are excess panels…

    “So what do you do in the meantime after spending about $840 million buying a plant?” said Thompson Wu, an analyst at Credit Suisse. “You just say, I have to decide whether I’m better off making TVs at a discount and make less money incrementally or having manufacturing not doing anything.”

    This is plagiarism… this is EXACTLY what the NYT wrote and you do not reference the quote (apart from the pathetic ‘source’ link at the END of the article).

    “So, has Foxconn really prepared for life after Apple? Or has it simply prepared itself for Apple’s next big thing?”

    So basically, your entire article was a pointless, plagiarised SEO grab/filler?

  • lwdesign1

    Killian, it looks like you’ve jumped on the “demand for Apple products is falling” bandwagon without doing any checking. The mainstream media has already decided that Apple is somehow losing money and as usual, is “DOOMED”, even though they’re still making money hand over fist. Yes, their overall sales were not as great as the first quarter last year by a small amount, but they’re still insanely profitable. If you’ve fallen for the completely artificial valuation of their stock price, let me point out that the per share price dropped from $700 to $400 just after they turned in one of their best years ever, and now that they’ve announced their first down quarter in years, their stock price is now UP to $460/share. I’m quite shocked and surprised that you seem to be parroting the doom and gloom scenario as mainstream analysts and media.

  • Steven Quan

    I think the drop in demand from Dell and HP probably hurt just as much, if not more than the drop in shipments for iPhones and iPads. The PC industry is reeling, but Apple products still have a demand.

About the author

Killian BellKillian Bell is a staff writer based in the U.K. He has an interest in all things tech and also covers Android over at CultofAndroid.com. You can follow him on Twitter via @killianbell.

(sorry, you need Javascript to see this e-mail address)| Read more posts by .

Posted in News, Top stories | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |