Review: Sony Walkman S540 Series Video MP3 Player

20091119-home.JPG

Press releases, you will hardly be surprised to hear, are rarely very interesting. But one arrived in my inbox a couple of weeks ago that made me double-take.

“Sony’s S Series Walkman,” it chattered, “is a serious challenger to the iPod Nano.” Gosh, really? Perhaps the Cult had better have a look at one, then, despite it hitting the shops a couple of months ago.

20091119-backview.JPG

20091119-sideview.jpg

Sony claims the Walkman is better than a Nano because: it has a bigger screen (2.4 inches compared to the Nano’s puny 2.2 inches), better speakers, radio recording, better batter life, and unlimited TV shows.

The bigger screen is, yes, bigger. But so minutely fractionally so that boasting about it is almost embarrassing. For the rest of us. It’s bright enough, and saturated enough, but ultimately it’s as much of a muchness as makes no odds.

20091119-video.jpg

Also: the “video” they’re talking about is video you watch, not video you record. The Sony isn’t a camera, like the Nano is.

Anyway, says Sony. Who wants to record their own videos? We have other features.

The speakers, now, yes, those speakers. It’s true that the Walkman has stereo speakers. In fact, most of it seems to be speaker. Every part of the front facia that isn’t screen or button is speaker; a couple more speakers are included on the back too. This thing is festooned with speakers.

20091119-iphonetop.JPG

20091119-iphoneside.JPG

But the end result isn’t great sound. Having lots of tiny, tinny speakers on a device like this doesn’t change the fact that the sound is tiny and tinny. The upshot is something that sounds just as tinny as its rivals, only a bit louder. Tinny sound that goes up to 11.

That’s not supposed to be a criticism of Sony, either. I’m sure the result would be the same if Apple covered an iPod with speakers on all sides. The difference is that Apple knows the result wouldn’t be worth the effort.

20091119-playing.JPG

20091119-recordradio.JPG

DON'T MISS
CES: Zoom’s Q3 Serves Up Meaty Sound With A Side Of Video

The next two features are easy to deal with, because they’re both quite nice: yes, you can record radio and it’s jolly handy. And yes, the battery lasts ages and that’s just great.

The device is well sized, nice and small. It’s very light, but feels solid. You get the sense that it’ll survive a fair amount of knocking about in your pocket or bag. It’s also a decent price for your 8GB or 16GB worth of space. If you want to listen to stuff as you walk around, it’s a fine piece of kit.

Rating: ★★★★☆


Company: Sony
Model: S Series Walkman
List Price: $129 (16GB)
Buy Now: The Sony S Series Walkman is available from Amazon for $116 with free shipping.

You know what, I’ll give this one to Sony: they’re right. It is a challenger to the Nano. But if I were to make the choice, I’d still pick the Nano, and here’s why: the features Sony is trumpeting don’t seem that compelling to me, and don’t compensate for the lack of a video camera. I’m one of those people who’d rather have the camera, and can live without all those speakers.

About the author

gilest

Giles Turnbull is a freelance writer in England. He writes for the Press Association and The Morning News. He has a website you can ignore and a Twitter account you needn't follow.

(sorry, you need Javascript to see this e-mail address)| Read more posts by .

Posted in Hardware, Reviews, Top stories |

  • chano

    Good article, but some training in photography seems in order, don’t you think Mr.T? Focused in your writing but not …….

  • http://gilest.org Giles Turnbull

    I am the *last* person to claim to have any skill at product photography, as I commented on Twitter about 10 minutes after taking these shots.

    That said, the sixth picture (the *really* blurry one) was *meant* to be that way.

    Related fact: I need to get a tripod.

  • firesign3000

    unlimited tv shows? what the hell does that mean?

  • nabil2199

    ‘If you want to listen to stuff as you walk around, it’s a fine piece of kit.’ isn’t that the purpose of a portable music player?
    Also it is well known that the walkman’s sound quality is a lot better than the nano’s.
    killer feature: UMS

  • lameplanet

    Agree with nabil2199 on the sound quality. I stopped using my nano and gave it to my brother after i heard the Sony. It’s in a league of its own in terms of sound.

    Unfortunately the software is terrible. It doesn’t play well at all with OS X and in general it’s a lot less user friendly than the ipod.

    So it depends on your priorities I guess.

  • chris

    one thing, and the most important thing, that you forgot to look at was the sony s540′s sound quality, which is superb compared to the ipod nano. the tactile controls are also superb and easy to use, and the speakers do come in handy sometimes. if you want the best sound quality out of an mp3 player, buy a sony walkman. if you want a video camera(which i find completely irrelevant to anything you’d desire from an mp3 player) and something compatible with a mac, get an ipod nano.